J. Guimarães
et al / Proelium
VII (11)361
(2016)
Proelium
VII (11) (2016)
- 379 361 - 379
Optical Inter-Satellite Links:
Applications in Defense
Jonathan Guimarães a, Maria João Martins a1, António Baptista b1
a
Academia Militar, Rua Gomes Freire, 1169-203, Lisboa, Portugal
b
Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
RESUMO
Nos dias de hoje, o uso de satélites é essencial na vida quotidiana e afeta
quase todos os campos de atividade da sociedade. Na Defesa, as comunicações
por satélite têm um papel preponderante: a possibilidade de obter informação
sobre as atividades do inimigo e sobre o teatro de operações em tempo real, é
vital para o sucesso de qualquer missão. A maioria das ligações intersatélites,
e entre os satélites e a estação de base, usa a banda de radiofrequência (RF).
As comunicações óticas são uma tecnologia emergente que oferece, entre outras
vantagens, maior largura de banda, que é necessária para poder transmitir um
volume crescente de dados. Este facto representa uma mais-valia significativa
para as operações militares. O futuro das comunicações por satélite está pois,
dependente dos desenvolvimentos nos sistemas de comunicação óticos. Neste
artigo, o diagrama de blocos e as principais características destes sistemas serão
apresentadas e analisadas.
Palavras-chave: Comunicações óticas; ligação por satélite; lasers; fotodetetores;
radiofrequência.
1
Contato: Email –
[email protected]
[email protected]
Recebido em 24 de abril de 2016 / Aceite em 30 de maio de 2016
- 361 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
ABSTRACT
Nowadays the use of satellites is essential in everyday life affecting many areas
of our society. In Defense, satellite communications play a key role. On the
military side, the ability to obtain information in time, about the enemy and
the theater of operations, is vital to fulfill the missions. Currently, the majority
of inter-satellites communications and between the satellite and ground stations
uses the radiofrequency (RF) bands. The free space optical communications are
emerging as an alternative, providing, among other advantages, a much larger
bandwidth, which is necessary to deal with increasingly larger amounts of data.
This represents a significant added-value in military operations. The future of
satellite communications will then be strongly dependent on developments in
optical communication systems. In this paper the block diagram and the main
characteristics of these systems will be presented and discussed.
Key-words: Optical communications; satellite links; lasers; photodetectors;
radiofrequency.
1. INTRODUÇÃO
Satellite communication systems have evolved significantly over the last
decade and currently are a key element in modern communication systems.
These systems are in continuous progress, due mainly to the increased use of
Internet. Therefore, substantial investments are being made by industry and
governments to answer the demand in this area (Misra, 2013).
In Defense, satellite communications play a key role. On the military side, the ability
to obtain information in time, about the enemy and the theater of operations, is vital
to fulfill the missions. In this kind of activities, the use of satellites allows navigation
of the military forces through the analysis of satellite images for the reconnaissance of
the territory, as well as meteorological information. It also provides communications,
essential to coordination between forces on the battlefield.
The constant increase of traffic on telecommunications networks requires an
increase in the used bandwidth, so as to ensure good quality in communications.
Thus the development of new optical inter-satellite communication systems, and
between a terrestrial base and the satellites, becomes essential to answer the
increasing demand of bandwidth (Misra, 2013),(Santos, 2008),(Barbosa, 2008).
Compared to radio frequency (RF) links, in use at the present time, optical links
offer numerous advantages (Hemmati, 2014), (Zhoou et al, 2008), (Hammado
and Zghair, 2014):
•
greater bandwidth and the possibility of higher data rates (in the order of
Giga bits per second (Gbps));
- 362 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
•
•
•
•
•
smaller terminal size and weight;
do not require licenses for its implementation (in RF licenses are required
due to the request transmission frequencies);
lower power consumption of the antennas;
greater security and resistance to interference (due to the smaller beam
width and higher directivity), an essential tool for military applications;
higher power at the receiver.
The analysis of this kind of systems is the objective of this paper.
In Fig. 1 a traditional optical communication system, involving LEO 1 and GEO
satellites and a ground station, is shown. The use of LEO and GEO satellites is
important because of their functions (Earth observation, communications, scientific
and military missions). The link between satellites is established by laser, while the
link between GEO satellite and the ground station can be optical or by RF. In this
last case it is necessary to determine if the optical link between satellite and Earth
is possible, due to attenuation in the atmosphere and the pointing problems between
the satellite and the base station. The majority of communication and meteorological
satellites use GEO orbits because they are stationary relative to Earth, which facilitates
the communication between the satellite and the ground station.
Fig. 1 – Optical communication system representation (Carlo and Roberto, 2006).
The characteristics of the environment involving satellites are influenced by its
altitude. An aspect that should be considered is the Earth’s atmosphere. The
Earth’s atmosphere can disrupt the light propagation, therefore its effects must
be considered. These effects are shown in particular in Earth-satellite links (or
vise versa) because the optical beam travels through the atmosphere. There
are three most relevant atmospheric effects that affect the propagation of the
2
Types of Orbits: LEO (200-2000 km), MEO (2000-35780 km), GEO (35780 km) and HEO (>35780 km).
- 363 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
optical beam: geometric attenuation, atmospheric attenuation and atmospheric
turbulence. The geometric attenuation consists in the increasing divergence of
the optical beam, during its propagation, due to diffraction. With this divergence
only part of the beam energy is focused and captured in the reception area
of the optical antenna. The atmospheric attenuation is caused by the absorption and dispersion of the beam energy due to its interaction with the various
particles present in the atmosphere, such as molecules (water vapor, carbon
dioxide, ozone, etc), water drops and suspended particles (dusts). Finally, the
atmospheric turbulence is due to the changes in the atmospheric refractive
index that can be induced, for example, by changes in the temperature profile.
These variations cause losses by beam deformation due to random deviations
in the beam propagation trajectory.
However, in inter-satellite links, the links are established above 100 km of altitude,
so the atmospheric effects are not important, and therefore, it can be considered
that the beam propagation channel is free space (Santos, 2008), (Barbosa, 2008).
The distance of this links is typically in the order of thousands of kilometers, the most
common being around 40000 km. However, there are examples for distances greater
than 40000 km. For these distances, only optical links can maintain communications
with bitrates around Gbps. Note that with the increase of the distance, the power
level required at the transmitter is higher and it is harder to point with precision the
optical beam from the transmitter to the receiver.
Then, the implementation of this type of links requires a set of specifications,
which are:
•
•
•
•
•
The laser used for the optical source must have a narrow and coherent
beam to ensure a lower degradation;
The transmitted power generally varies from several hundred milliwatts
(mW), until 10 W, depending on the needs and characteristics of the link;
Minimum power at the receiver: receiver requires a minimal power around
one nanoWatt (nW). This power is related to the sensitivity of the optical
receivers;
PAT (Pointing, Acquisition and Tracking) systems: allows pointing the laser
beam with precision to the receiver, establish communication and follow its
trajectory. It is an essential element to the success of these links;
Reliability of electronic devices in the space environment is mandatory,
since there are high levels of radiation and extreme temperature ranges. The
electronic devices incorporated in the satellites have to ensure reliability,
because maintenance and/or replacement operations are very difficult (if
possible) and have high costs. Therefore, there are mainly three ways to
make an immune system or, at least, increase its robustness to these adverse
conditions: redundant circuits, the use of shields and building electronic
circuits with more resistant materials.
- 364 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
2. THE OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
An optical communication system is composed by a transmitter, a receiver, and
a signal propagation channel, which depends on the type of link: it can be air
or free space. However, in the optical inter-satellite links it is considered that
the propagation channel is free space.
Typically, the function of the optical transmitter is to convert an electrical signal
(which encodes information to be transmitted) in an optical signal, which will
be responsible for transmitting data to the receiver. The receiver converts the
information of optical domain to the electrical domain and also has the function
of processing correctly the electrical signal in order to recover the transmitted
information with minimum error as possible. Fig. 2 presents the standard block
diagram of the optical communication system.
Fig. 2 – Optical communication system block diagram.
2.1 Modulation Techniques
The modulation and demodulation are executed in the electrical domain. The
modulator operates in the signal emitted by the laser, converting the transmitted
data in an established standardized format (Vilela et al, 2014).
This paper analyzes two modulation techniques: On-Off Keying (OOK) and
Pulse Position Modulation (PPM). They are characterized by simple techniques
with high reliability and with low implementation costs.
2.1.1 On-Off Keying (OOK)
The OOK modulation may be considered as a special case of amplitude modulation. As can be seen in Fig. 4, it consists in a binary technique where each
time slot, , corresponds to one bit. The bit “1” is indicated by the presence
of a laser pulse, while the bit “0” is indicated by the absence of signal. The
pulses are necessarily unipolar, the NRZ type (Non-Return-to-Zero), that is,
the pulse duration has the duration of a bit period, or RZ (Return-to-Zero) in
which the pulse duration is a fraction of the bit period. The NRZ pulses are
- 365 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
more used than the RZ pulses, because they are simpler and require a smaller
bandwidth at the photodetector (Coelho, 2009). For this reason, in this work,
we will consider NRZ pulses.
In the demodulation process it is the receiver that checks if at every seconds
is reached a signal “0” or “1”(Vilela et al, 2014).
Fig. 3 – OOK signal for NRZ pulses.
The time slot, Ts , can be calculated by the following equation:
where Db is the bitrate (bps).
In Fig. 5 the power levels of the laser signal are defined. Note that the “0” bit
power ( Pmin ), does not correspond to a null power.
Fig. 4 – Laser signal power levels [2].
The ratio between maximum power, Pmax, and the minimum power, Pmin, is
called the extinction ratio and is given by (Agrawal, 2002)
where Pmin < Pmax , varying the extinction ratio between 0 < r < 1.
At the same time, the maximum and minimum power can be also obtained
from the average power, Pmed , and the extinction ratio, r (Cartaxo, 2005):
- 366 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
2.1.2 Pulse Position Modulation (PPM)
The PPM modulation consists in dividing the allocated time for the transmission
of a symbol in m equal time slots ( m is the modulation order). To represent
a certain symbol, a pulse is sent only in one the m slots, as shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5 – 4-PPM Signal.
The number of time slots, m , depends on the number of bits sent per symbol, k :
The symbol duration, Tsimb , depends on the bit rate Db , and is given by:
And the duration of the slot, Ts:
2.2 Optical Source: The Laser
The main component of the optical transmitter is the optical source which generates
the light radiation. There are different types of light sources which can be used for
optical communications, such as LED’s (Light Emitting Diodes) or lasers. Currently,
there are the RCLED (resonant-cavity LEDs), which are based on conventional LED’s,
but due to some changes in its structure, improvements have been made in emitted
light beam, which ensure greater directionality and intensity (Tsai and Xu, 2013).
- 367 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
In the majority of long distance satellite intercommunication systems the laser is
used as the light source. These cases are associated with high levels of attenuation,
and only lasers have the capacity to establish efficient links, due to its specific
characteristics: the emission of monochromatic radiation (wavelength well defined)
and narrow and highly directive light beams. These characteristics are essential to
ensure a small degradation of the beam, as well as reduce its temporal dispersion,
allowing the modulation at higher data rates (Vilela et al, 2014), (Keiser, 1991).
The lasers are classified according the active medium used in them. Currently,
solid-state lasers are the most used in optical space communications, which
results from their characteristics: smaller dimensions, making possible a more
compact design, and greater energy efficiency in converting the electric power
supplied into light energy, enabling to establish links at distances greater than
40000 km with light power less than 10W. The most widely used lasers in this
kind of links are the semiconductor lasers and the crystal lasers.
The type of laser is chosen according to the characteristics of the link that is
implemented, such as distance, altitude, the environmental conditions and the
power level required in the receiver. It also depends on the wavelength chosen for the link and on the implemented modulation format. In Table I some
examples of solid-state lasers used in optical inter-satellite links are presented.
Table I − Solid-State Lasers Examples Used In Optical Inter-Satellites Links.
3
Nd:YAG (Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet) is a crystal that is used for solid-state lasers.
- 368 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
2.3 Optical Antennas
In these communication systems, optical antennas are used to transmit and
receive the laser beam. These antennas are used to collect and focus light,
particularly in visible spectrum.
There are three primary types of antennas: refractors (dioptrics) which use
lenses, and reflectors (catoptrics) which use mirrors and combining lens-mirror
systems (catadioptrics) which use lenses and mirrors in combination. The last
one are most used in optical communication systems.
Typically, an optical antenna has an associated gain. The gain of an optical
antenna is given by the following equation (Aviv, 2006):
where da is the equivalent aperture of optical antenna, ƞ is the efficiency and
λ is the wavelength.
2.4 PHOTODETECTOR
The photodetector is the element of the optical receiver that converts the optical
signal in an electrical signal through the photoelectric effect.
Despite the diversity of photodetectors (photomultiplier, pyroelectric detectors,
photoconductors, phototransistors and photodiodes), in optical communications
the photodiodes are almost always used in these kind of systems. That is
because they have the best characteristics, that is, small size, high sensitivity
and low cost (Coelho, 2009), (Keiser, 1991)
There are two types of photodiodes used in the optical communication systems:
PIN and APD (Avalanche Photodiode) (Keiser, 1991).
2.4.1 PIN photodiode
The PIN photodiode has the structure of a p-n junction, separated by a lightly
doped intrinsic region. The photodiode is reverse biased so that in the region
with greater resistance, the intrinsic region, there is an intense electric field
and there are almost no mobile carriers, electrons and holes ( Vilela et al,
82014) (Keiser, 1991).
- 369 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
Fig. 6 − Pin photodiode reverse bias representation [3].
As shown in Fig. 6, a photon incident on the depletion region, with an energy
higher than the energy gap between the semiconductor bands, will excite an
electron from the valence band to the conduction band. As a result, a free
electron-hole pair is generated. Due to the intense electric field present in the
depletion region, free electrons move to the region “n” and the holes move to
the region “p” before their recombination. This charge flow causes the appearance of the current, IP called the photocurrent.
A photodiode characteristic parameter is the responsivity, which defines the
performance of the photodiode. The responsivity is the relationship between the
generated current and the optical power incident on the photodiode (Keiser, 1991):
where Pi is the optical power incident on the photodetector.
2.4.2 APD photodetector
The APD photodiode has the capability of amplifying the internal current
generated in the photo detection process. It differs from the PIN photodiode
because it needs higher bias voltages to achieve the desired operation. As can
be seen in Fig. 10, the APD structure includes a very high electric field region,
designated by avalanche region. The avalanche region corresponds to the zone
where the electric field is greater than the minimum required, Em , to cause
breakdown of the n+-p junction and to allow signal amplification (Coelho, 2009).
Fig. 7 – An APD together with the eletric-field distribution
inside various layers under reverse bias (Keiser, 1991).
- 370 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
Such as the pin photodiode, the APD performance is characterized by its responsivity, RAPD, which expresses the relationship between the APD output current and the
optical power incident on the avalanche photodiode. The relationship between the
APD responsivity and responsivity to the primary current is given by (Keiser, 1991):
where M is the avalanche gain.
2.4.3 Photodetection noise
Ideally, the electrical current generated by the photodetector is directly proportional to the incident optical power. However, this current has fluctuations,
even when the incident power is constant. These fluctuations are caused by
several types of noise. The most relevant are the quantum noise and circuit
noise (Keiser, 1991): that will be discussed in the following two sections.
• Quantum noise
An incident optical signal on the photodetector, with a given optical power, corresponds to a certain average number of photons per unit of time. However, the time
slot between photons is a random variable and the photocurrent generated by the
photodiode is not a continuous process. Besides, the photodetector generates a small
current in the absence of any optical signal. This current is called dark current, Id
, and results from thermally generated electron-hole pairs. The contribution of this
current can be included in the quantum noise photodiode.
The photodiode quantum noise current variance is defined by:
where is the electron charge, M is the avalanche gain (in the case of pin photodiode, M=1 ), is a photodiode material parameter, with values between “0”
and “1”, and Be,n is the equivalent noise bandwidth from the optical receiver.
• Circuit noise
The circuit noise comes from the resistive and active elements present in the
optical receiver. So, its value depends on the remaining electrical elements of
the receiver such as the amplifier. For this reason, this type of noise will be
discussed in the next section.
2.5 Electrical Amplifier
Normally, the photodetector output signal is so weak that needs to be amplified before
it can be properly processed by other system devices. The electric amplifiers amplify
the low levels of transmitted electrical current generated by the photodetectors.
- 371 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
An amplifier must have the following characteristics: low noise, high gain and
adequate bandwidth. Since the noise increases with the bandwidth, these two
parameters have to be carefully taken into account to optimize the performance
of the receiver.(Coelho, 2009).
As mentioned above, the electrical components, which constitute the amplification circuit, also contribute to circuit noise. Besides, the amplifier gain also
interferes in the system circuit noise. So, circuit noise current variance, σ 2c ,
is given by (Cartaxo, 2005):
where GA is the amplifier gain, that corresponds to the value of the amplification circuit transfer function for the null frequency, that is, HA (f = 0) and:
where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature (Kelvin), RL
is the load resistance of the photodetector and FN is the amplifier noise factor.
The square root of the power spectrum density of the circuit noise power,√Sc(f),
is measured in units A/√Hz. The typical values are in the order of 1 pA/√Hz [4].
So, the total noise current variance, σ 2n , is obtained from the sum of the
different noise variances mentioned above [4]:
3. SIGNAL POWER BUDGET AND BIT-ERROR RATE (BER)
3.1 Signal Power Budget
The signal power budget has the objective of estimate the optical received
power at the receiver. All the gains and losses involved in the communication
process are considered that is, transmitter, receiver and signal propagation
channel. Thus, in the optical communication system analysis, the following
factors will be considered: optical transmitted power, antenna gains (emission
and reception) and attenuation in free space. For simulation purposes it will be
considered that the emitted laser beam is perfectly coincident with the receiving
surface and therefore the pointing losses will be neglected. The receiver power
in dBm is given by (Oscarsson, 2008), (Alluru, 2010):
- 372 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
where Pt is the average optical power normalized to 1 mW, Gt and Gr the gains of
the transmitting and receiving antennas, respectively, and Ls the free space losses.
The free space losses are given by:
where λ is the wavelength and d is the distance between satellites.
3.2 Bit-Error Rate
The optical receiver performance of a digital transmission system is measured
by the BER (Bit-Error Rate). This parameter is defined as the ratio between
the number of incorrect bits received by the total number of bits transferred
in a given time interval. Typically, in this kind of communication systems
the BER should be below 10-6, and the typical values are between 10-6 e 10-9
(Zaki et al, 2014).
3.2.1 BER – OOK Modulation
For OOK modulation, BER can be calculated by the following equation
(Agarwal, 2002):
where Q parameter is given by:
where V0 and V 1 are the values of the voltages logic levels “0” and “1” and
σ1 and σ2 are the squared root of the noise variances to symbols “0” and
“1”, respectively, obtained individualizing the expression (13) for the optical
power for the symbols “0” and “1”. The erfc function is the complementary
error function, defined as:
- 373 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
3.2.2
BER – PPM Modulation
As already mentioned, this modulation technique is more complex than OOK,
since several bits are sent in a pulse. A rigorous synchronization is necessary
with the start of each symbol by the receiver. Thus, at the receiver, in the
decoding process, he correct time interval must be chosen, which in theory,
will be the highest intensity of the pulse. However, if the receiver decodes the
wrong interval, the number of bit errors will be The average number of wrong
bits by decision errors is given by:
where m is the modulation order.
The receiver probability to choose the correct time interval is represented by
the following expression (Oscarsson, 2008):
Based on the expressions (19) and (20), the BER for PPM modulation is defined
by (Oscarsson, 2008)::
4. TESTS AND RESULTS
In this section several practical examples will be analysed, using the simulator
developed, with the goal of comparing the system performance in different
situations.
4.1 Simulation
of
Increased Distance
This example will be based on data from an optical link held in 2008 between
two LEO satellites: NFIRE e TerraSAR-X (Gagnon, 2012).
The data used in the simulator are:
- 374 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
Table II - Parameters Inserted In The Simulator
With these values, there were several simulations with different distances. The
results are presented in Table III.
Table III - Results Obtained in Function of The Distance Variation.
- 375 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
With the results obtained in the table, it possible to see that there is a
significant increase in the BER with increasing link distance. It should
be noted that the BER requirement is largely accomplished for the initial
distance (5000 km), but from 15000 km, with these parameters, the link
is not viable. The received power and the signal-to-noise ratio follows as
expected, the increase of BER. The circuit noise remained constant, because
the noise parameters of the electrical elements were not changed. However,
quantum noise decreased with increasing distance, since this type of noise
depends on the received power. So, if the received power was decreasing,
the quantum noise followed this decay.
4.2 Simulation With Different Modulation Types
In this example the data are from an optical link held in 2012 between a LEO
satellite and a GEO satellite: AlphaSat and Sentinel 2-A (Gagnon, 2012)
The data used in the simulator were:
Table IV - Parameters Inserted in the Simulator [5].
The receiver parameters remained the same as in the previous example. In Table
V the BER results according to the selected modulation format are shown.
- 376 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
Table V - Ber Depending on the Type of Modulation
The objective of this simulation is to compare system performance with the
different modulation types. From the results obtained, it is concluded that the
OOK modulation has the worst performance. In the other side, it appears that
the greater the PPM modulation order, the better is the BER performance.
However, the performance improvements are not very significant with increases
the modulation order, and the biggest “jump” happens when going from 32 to
64-PPM. Therefore, in most cases, the performance improvement obtained does
not compensate the increase of the system complexity. Traditionally, it is for
this reason that the modulation order used is 2 (2-PPM). In this case, to have
a viable link, the 64-PPM modulation would have exceptionally to be used.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The growing importance of optical communications in the commercial and military
areas, in an optical inter-satellite intercommunication system using lasers was presented in this paper. The study has identified the transmitter and receiver subsystems
and analyzed the main characteristics associated with these communication systems.
A simulator based on Matlab was also developed, which allows the test on the
impact that the variation of the parameters has on the performance of the system.
The development of this kind of links is a new technological development
with very high commercial impact, due to the higher bandwidth requirements
caused by the increase of traffic in telecommunications networks and the Internet. Thus, the need of increasingly larger bandwidths, becomes essential to
the development of optical communication systems, in ground and space.
- 377 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
BYBLIOGRAFIC REFERENCES
AGRAWAL, G. P. (2002). Fiber-Optic Communications, Third Edition, New
York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ALLURU, S.R. (2010). A System Design of an Optical Wireless Communication
System for Cubesats, University of Florida, Florida.
AVIV, D. (2006). Laser Space Communications, Norwood: Artech House, 2006.
MISRA, D.,Tripathi, S.P. (2013) Satellite Communication Advancement, Issues,
Challenges and Aplications, International Journal of Advanced Research in
Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1681-1686.
Oscarsson, P. J. (2008) Simulation of Optical Communication for Formation
Flying Spacecraft,Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala.
SANTOS, L. B. (2008) Análise de sistemas de comunicação utilizando óptica
no espaço livre,Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro.
TSAI, C. l. and Xu, Z.F. (2013) Line-of-Sight Visible Light Communications
With InGaN-Based Resonant Cavity LEDs, IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 1793-1796.
VILELA, D. , Santos, J, Brandão, L. and M. Breda, (2012) Estudo da Viabilidade de Comunicações Óticas no Espaço Aberto, Internet: http://www.
teleco.com.br/tutoriais/tutorialfsoeab1/pagina_3.asp. [Accessed 20 December
2014].
ZAKI, M., Fayed, H., Aziz, A., Aly, M. (2014) The Influence of Varying
the Optical Wavelength on ISL Performance Recognizing High Bit Rates,
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 9, n.º
1, pp. 64-70.
ZHOU, L., Wen, C., Liu, B. (2008) Optical system in laser inter-satellites
communication, in International Conference on Computer Science and
Information Tecnology, Singapore.
- 378 -
J. Guimarães et al / Proelium VII (11) (2016) 361 - 379
JONATHAN GUIMARÃES
Was born in Nice, France, on November 7, 1991. In 2009 he joined the Portuguese Army where he completed the “Licenciatura” in Telecommunications at the
Military Academy, in Lisbon, and the Master Degree in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Master Course at Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon in 2015.
MARIA JOÃO M. MARTINS
Completed the ”Licenciatura” and Doctoral Degree, both at Instituto Superior
Tecnico, Lisbon, where she taught as Professor in the Department of Electrical
and Computer Engineering. She was an invited Professor in the Universities of
Karlsruhe, Germany, (1992) and Rennes I, France (2004), She served as Expert-evaluator for the European Commission, in the 5th and 6th Framework Programs.
She is since 2012 Professor in the Military Academy in Lisbon.
ANTÓNIO C. C. SIMÕES BAPTISTA
Completed the ”Licenciatura”, Master and Doctoral Degree, at Instituto Superior
Tecnico, Lisbon, where he has been teaching as Professor in the Department
of Electrical and Computer Engineering to the present day.
- 379 -