Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Enzyme Function Classification

2017, Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Innovations and Trends

https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2229-4.CH008

Abstract

Enzymes are important in our life and it plays a vital role in the most biological processes in the living organisms and such as metabolic pathways. The classification of enzyme functionality from a sequence, structure data or the extracted features remains a challenging task. Traditional experiments consume more time, efforts, and cost. On the other hand, an automated classification of the enzymes saves efforts, money and time. The aim of this chapter is to cover and reviews the different approaches, which developed and conducted to classify and predict the functions of the enzyme proteins in addition to the new trends and challenges that could be considered now and in the future. The chapter addresses the main three approaches which are used in the classification the function of enzymatic proteins and illustrated the mechanism, pros, cons, and examples for each one.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Automated enzyme classification reduces time and costs compared to traditional experimental methods.
  2. The IUBMB enzyme classification system categorizes enzymes into six main classes based on their reactions.
  3. Three primary approaches exist for enzyme function classification: sequence alignment, structural analysis, and feature-based methods.
  4. The EC numbering scheme provides a systematic way to identify enzymes with four hierarchical levels.
  5. Future trends in enzyme classification focus on integrating computational methods for improved accuracy and efficiency.
161 Chapter 8 Enzyme Function Classification: Reviews, Approaches, and Trends Mahir M. Sharif Cairo University, Egypt & Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan & Scientific Research Group in Egypt (SRGE), Egypt Alaa Tharwat Suez Canal University, Egypt & Cairo University, Egypt & Scientific Research Group in Egypt (SRGE), Egypt Aboul Ella Hassanien Cairo University, Egypt & Scientific Research Group in Egypt (SRGE), Egypt Hesham A. Hefny Cairo University, Egypt ABSTRACT Enzymes are important in our life and it plays a vital role in the most biological processes in the living organisms and such as metabolic pathways. The classification of enzyme functionality from a sequence, structure data or the extracted features remains a challenging task. Traditional experiments consume more time, efforts, and cost. On the other hand, an automated classification of the enzymes saves efforts, money and time. The aim of this chapter is to cover and reviews the different approaches, which developed and conducted to classify and predict the functions of the enzyme proteins in addition to the new trends and challenges that could be considered now and in the future. The chapter addresses the main three approaches which are used in the classification the function of enzymatic proteins and illustrated the mechanism, pros, cons, and examples for each one. INTRODUCTION Proteins play important roles in the living organisms. They carry out a majority of the cellular processes and act as structural constituents, catalysis agents, signaling molecules and molecular machines of every biological system. It makes up a large proportion of living cells and they are important (i) as enzymes to carry out all the metabolic reactions (biological catalysts) going on inside the cell; (ii) as structural proteins making up connective tissue, muscle, bones and the cellular division machinery; (iii) as receptors and ion channels to communicate from the outside to the inside of the cell and to allow flow of ions DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2229-4.ch008 Copyright © 2017, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.  Enzyme Function Classification and small molecules across the cell membrane; (iv) as the basis of our immune system in the form of antibodies and (v) being involved in macro-molecular complexes with RNA, DNA and carbohydrate molecules (Eisenberg,2000, Gennis,2013). Enzymes represent basic and the most important types of proteins. The enzyme or protein sequences contained in various organisms are very easy to determine, but to find experimentally the function of a protein remains a tedious and expensive task because it needs a faster and more cost-effective manner. Thus, the biologists are interested to find an automatic approach that can help them to filter among the numerous possibilities, and so with the aid of computational methods for the development of models to classify and predict the functions of various enzymes based on similarities between their sequences and/or their spatial structures (Tharwat, et al.,2015a) The IUBMB enzyme classification system represents the first enzyme classification set by the Enzyme Commission (EC) since five decades ago to classify the enzymes and update with new enzymes which discover. IUBMB puts Enzyme Nomenclature and decided to retain the systematic names as the basis for classification for any reason, e.g. the code number alone is only useful for identification of an enzyme; systematic names stresses the type of reaction; can be formed for new enzymes by the discoverer; and the systematic names are helpful in finding recommended names that are in accordance with the general pattern. According to above recommendations the EC develops a new scheme of enzyme classification and numbering consist of code numbers prefixed by EC which is now widely in use. The EC classification system contains four elements/numbers separated by points, the first number shows to which of the six main divisions (classes) the enzyme belongs, the second number indicates the subclass, the third number gives the sub-subclass, and finally the fourth number is the serial number of the enzyme in its sub-subclass. EC classified the enzymes based on the chemical reactions into six main classes such as (i) Oxidoreductases to this class belong all enzymes catalyzing oxidoreduction reactions, (ii) Transferases are enzymes transferring a group, e.g. a methyl group or a glycosyl group, (iii) Hydrolases these enzymes catalyze the hydrolytic cleavage of C−O, C−N, C−C and some other bonds enzyme, (iv) Lyases are enzymes cleaving C−C, C−O, C−N, and other bonds by elimination, leaving double bonds or rings, or conversely adding groups to double bonds, (v) Isomerases these enzymes catalyze geometric or structural changes within one molecule, (vi) Ligases catalyzing the joining together of two molecules coupled with the hydrolysis of a pyrophosphate bond in ATP or a similar triphosphate (Sharif et al.,2015a, Tipton,1994). The rest of the book chapter is organized as follows: Section 2 presents some of the state-of-the-art methods. Section 3 introduces a detailed explanation of enzyme function classification using sequence alignment. In this section, sequence alignment methods and the similarity score calculations are explained. Section 3 presents details about enzyme function classification using enzymes’ structures. Enzyme function classification using features is introduced in Section 4. Finally, conclusions and future work are presented in Section 5. BACKGROUND There are three famous approaches widely used for enzyme prediction and classification based on sequence alignment, protein’s features, and the protein’s structure. There are many studies which conducted and a group of models which developed based on sequence alignment to classify and predict the enzymes/proteins. Cai et al., developed a method based on Support 162 24 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/chapter/enzyme-functionclassification/180944?camid=4v1 This title is available in Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, e-Book Collection, Computer Science and Information Technology e-Book Collection, Science, Engineering, and Information Technology e-Book Collection, Media and Communications e-Book Collection, Communications, Social Science, and Healthcare e-Book Collection, e-Book Collection Select, e-Book Collection Select, e-Book Collection Select, Computer Science eBook Collection, e-Book Collection Select, e-Book Collection Select, e-Book Collection Select, Computer Science and IT Knowledge Solutions e-Book Collection, Social Sciences Knowledge Solutions e-Book Collection, e-Book Collection Select, e-Book Collection. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/library-recommendation/?id=77 Related Content Hierarchies of Architectures of Collaborative Computational Intelligence Witold Pedrycz (2009). International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (pp. 1831). www.igi-global.com/article/hierarchies-architectures-collaborative-computationalintelligence/2783?camid=4v1a Seamless Implementation of a Telephone Switching System Based on Formal Specifications in RTPA Yingxu Wang and Yousheng Tian (2012). International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (pp. 81-104). www.igi-global.com/article/seamless-implementation-telephone-switchingsystem/72881?camid=4v1a Parallel Defect Detection Model on Uncertain Data for GPUs Computing by a Novel Ensemble Learning Sivakumar S., Sreedevi E., PremaLatha V. and Haritha D. (2021). Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Smart Technology (pp. 146-163). www.igi-global.com/chapter/parallel-defect-detection-model-on-uncertain-data-for-gpuscomputing-by-a-novel-ensemble-learning/265583?camid=4v1a A Camera-Based System for Determining Hand Range of Movement Measurements in Rheumatoid Arthritis Aaron Bond and Kevin Curran (2015). Recent Advances in Ambient Intelligence and Context-Aware Computing (pp. 39-59). www.igi-global.com/chapter/a-camera-based-system-for-determining-hand-range-of-movementmeasurements-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/121766?camid=4v1a
About the author
Papers
30
Followers
1
View all papers from D,alaa Tharwatarrow_forward