The Organized Multilevel Disintegration as an Emerging Order
Krystyna Laycraft…
25 pages
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
The paper explores the concept of multilevel disintegration in the context of personality development, focusing on two key types: spontaneous and organized multilevel disintegration. It describes how emotional and cognitive dynamisms influence personality, especially in gifted individuals, through processes of self-organization and the creation of more complex mental structures. Key themes include the necessity of chaotic phases for personal growth and the role of external support, as illustrated through a narrative interview with a singer reflecting on her experiences.
Key takeawaysAI
AI
- Emotional, intellectual, and imaginational overexcitability drive personality development through dynamic processes.
- Developmental dynamisms can be spontaneous or organized, influencing the transition between order and chaos.
- Spontaneous multilevel disintegration includes critical self-awareness and conscious choices, fostering personal growth.
- The organized disintegration leads to insights into one's identity, enhancing self-understanding and uniqueness.
- Personal narratives, such as journaling, are crucial in navigating emotional development and self-acceptance.
Related papers
Australasian Journal of Psychotherapy, 2016
Although the unconscious processes that comprise identification remain a theoretical cornerstone of personality development and of psychoanalysis, relatively little has been said about the process of dis-identification; whereby we relinquish important identifications, in order to change and to grow. This paper explores the different psychological climates that prompt dis-identification, sometimes in the service of growth, or sometimes as a denial of dependence and an enactment of unconscious envy. It is argued that a disidentification prompted by a move to internalize the combined parental couple will require that identifications with ...
Roeper Review, 2016
Dąbrowski's theory of positive disintegration is an emotion-centered, nonontogenetic, five-level theory of personality development where the experience of all emotions is essential for the process of growth. In this article, we examine the complexities of the three factors of development, which are essential to the notion of development within the theory of positive disintegration. We elaborate on the relationships between these factors, depict the processes and interactions in a new graphical framework, provide associated explanations, and support these by additional references to Dąbrowski's original writings.
ProQuest, 2025
Enduring change is difficult. Many treatments for pathologically canalized experiences and behaviors rely on slow and steady methods focused on structure and narrative. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that slow and steady methods are only weakly effective—the rate of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and other forms of pathological canalization are only increasing, despite our many medical advances. Traditional therapies ameliorate symptoms, but these symptoms invariably return as soon as active treatment ceases. Lasting change requires major neurophysiological and environmental shifts into non-ordinary states. As the mind and world are pulled apart, this opens the door to reconstructing the way you engage with the world. I call this process ‘disintegration-reintegration’. We create critical dynamics to leverage the brain’s ability to learn and relearn. The leading therapies—psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy, focused TMS and ultrasound, EMDR, and emerging solutions like VR-assisted, therapeutic dissociation are demonstrating that creating critical states and breaking patterns is key to fomenting psychological transformation. On the other end of disintegration is the equally necessary practice of reintegration. After pulling the world apart, we must mindfully work to put it back together. Many reintegrative practices have been independently identified and systematized. Meditation, yoga, breathwork, dance, tai chi, group therapy, and other somatic and social practices allow us to reconstruct our mind through the body. I identify the disintegration-reintegration dynamic and propose that it is underexplored. Once we begin to understand the scientific basis for the mechanism, we can and should develop means to exploit this phenomenon. I explore this in a series of experiments designed to pare away the superfluous bits. Beyond this, I build a model to demonstrate the foundational effectiveness of intentionally disintegrating ourselves and our perception of the world around us. This agent-based model creates a simulated world in which an agent trained to minimize its homeostatic deviation has its world suddenly decanalized—broken apart, causing it to take new pathways throughout its world. This results in better performance, demonstrating at a low level that—counter-intuitively—chaotic disruptions can lead to long-term stability. Finally, I propose a broader theory of meaning dynamics. Every experience we have is colored and shaped by meaning, both of the underlying goal-driven purpose that drives us and of the meaningfulness that accompanies the beautiful world in which we find ourselves. The intention is to further inspire an understanding of the scientifically and evolutionarily grounded forces that make the world appear so wondrous to us.
AwareNow Publishing , 2015
2010
To my knowledge Dabrowski never produced a systematic study focusing exclusively on the consequences of personal loss (e.g., of a parent or of a spouse). However throughout his published works there are numerous references to the phenomenon. In this presentation I will make use of these scattered references to articulate a Dabrowskian theory of the developmental function of loss. Briefly the theory is as follows. Those who possess psychic overexcitability (especially of the emotional and imaginational kinds) develop intense attachments to the significant persons in their lives, with the consequence that when they sustain a loss of one of these significant persons, their mourning is correspondingly intense. This intense mourning can result in one or another form of dysfunctional behaviour, the production of creative works, or personality development. In some cases, e.g., Michelangelo, all three are found in the same person. Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Dabr...
Erik Erikson, known as an ego-psychologist, asserts that his psychosocial principle of human development is genetically inevitable and accurately shapes the developmental process for all people. His primary theoretical and experiential focus is how personality and behavioral development is primarily influenced after birth (not before, i.e. genetically), and is so influenced most notably during childhood experiences and resolution of conflicts therein, followed in succession by influences during adulthood. Erikson achieved recognition and success for his expansion and refinement of Freud's theory of psychosexual stages (oral, anal, phallic, latency, genital) to his own, more comprehensive model of psychosocial development, determining that human development functions by the 'epigenetic principle'. According to this principle, humans develop in eight distinct stage's through a predetermined, progressive unraveling of what eventually constitutes as our individual personalities. The quality and speed of an individual's progression through each stage is partially, yet significantly, attributed to the success, or lack thereof, in each of the previous stages. Each stage consists of two opposing emotional forces known as contrary dispositions or crises. This essay, in reference to a one-on-one lifespan interview with now sixty-seven year old, Mary Moore Crowley, will identify and depict the manifestation of these stages and crises in her life and how they serve to illustrate Erikson's psychosocial theory of development. Firstly, it will introduce the basic principles of Erikson's eight stage life cycle model, followed by an analysis correlating Mary's relative key life events to each appropriate stage. In conclusion, it will present the most notable findings regarding Mary's management of each stage's optimal time period-resulting in the development of either a) certain psychosocial strengths (virtues) or b) various maladaptation's (too much positive/too little negative) or malignancies (too little positive/too much negative). Although Erikson stated that the concept for his developmental model is a work in progress and is constantly evolving, the following broad introduction of the model will highlight and summarize the main points of each of the eight 'syntonic vs dystonic' psychosocial crises before incorporating them with Mary's life. Stage 1, 'Trust vs Mistrust', occurs between the time of birth to around eighteen months (infancy) and where the infant's sole relationship is with the mother. Circumstances regarding feeding, teething, sleeping and being comforted can produce potential positive virtues such as basic trust, hope and drive, or, potential negative outcomes such as sensory distortion or withdrawal. Stage 2, 'Autonomy vs Shame', takes place between eighteen months and three years of age (toddler) as the infant develops a relationship with both parents. Issues pertaining to bodily functions, toilet training, muscular control and walking can be experienced positively, developing will-power and self-control, or negatively, exuding impulsivity and compulsion. Stage 3, 'Initiative vs Guilt', occurs from three to five years of age (preschooler) during which the child's relationships extend to outer family members. This stage of the child's life pertains to exploration, discovery, adventure and play, in which 'purpose/direction vs ruthlessness/inhibition' are the potential 'syntonic vs dystonic' outcomes. Stage 4, 'Industry vs Inferiority', is when the child is five to thirteen years old (elementary) in which his/her relationships expand to classmates, teachers and friends. A positive association with achievement and accomplishment, by which the child learns pleasure when applying themselves to tasks, produces the criteria necessary to healthy competence and strong method; as opposed to negative results which create narrow-mindedness and low virtuosity. Stage 5, 'Identity vs Role Confusion', occurs between thirteen and twenty-one years of age (adolescence) as the individual's relationships now encompass influential peers and larger groups. This final stage before young adulthood is crucial for testing roles that lead to an integrated single identity formation, establishing direction and becoming a 'grown-up'. Successful methods result in fidelity and emotion while unsuccessful experiences fuel fanaticism and repudiation. Stage 6, 'Intimacy vs Isolation', begins at twenty-one years old, carrying on until thirty-nine years of age (young adulthood). As a young adult, his or her influential relationships now include lovers, friends, work associates and any intimate relationship referring to the individual's personal and social life. Positive outcomes are the basis of love and affiliation, contrary to negative ones responsible for promiscuity and exclusivity. Stage 7, 'Generativity vs Stagnation', generally takes place between the ages of forty and sixty-five years of age (middle adulthood). Children are often the individuals core relationships, by which he/she discovers a sense of contribution and 'giving back' to the community. Generativity leads to care and production while stagnation creates a sense of overextension and rejection. Stage 8, 'Integrity vs Despair', arrives at sixty-five years of age (late adulthood) when the individual begins relating to society on a global level, in addition to reflection on their own life, and finding meaning and purpose from personal life achievements. Positive results lead to wisdom and renunciation, as opposed to negative ones fueling presumption, disdain and failure.
International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2018
Out of death comes life. It is the death of the old that brings birth of the new. This theme occurs countless times and in varying forms throughout mythology, religion, literature, science, psychology, education, and in our daily lives. This article describes how the death and rebirth experiences of the Buddha are reflected in our own spiritual, intellectual, creative, psychological, and emotional growth experiences.
2006
A philosopher – is a human being who constantly experiences, sees, hears, suspects, hopes, and dreams extraordinary things...” (Kaufmann, 2000, p. 420). In this presentation I have shared my perception that, in spite of the unlived years between their lives, the most enlightened psychotherapist Dr. Dabrowski, met the most enlightened philosopher, and they were one. Nietzsche planted the garden, Dr. Dabrowski prepared the menu and, with the assistance of his yet – to be published book On Developmental Psychotherapy, concerned psychotherapists will be able to nurture and help the misunderstood oppressed learn to survive in a world ruled by primitive egos; and, perhaps one day we will have a world in which all significant conflict is with the self. W. Kaufmann, 2000, Basic Writings of Nietzsche. Random House, Inc. New York. The Seventh International Congress of the Institute for Positive Disintegration in Human Development August 3-5, 2006 Calgary, AB, CANADA Dabrowski Proceedings 2006...
References (8)
- • Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
- • Dabrowski, K. (1967). Personality shaping through positive disintegration. Boston: Little , Brown & Company • Dabrowski, K. , Kawczak, A. & Piechowski, M. (1970). Mental growth through positive Disintegration. London: Gryf Publication Ltd.
- • Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London: Gryf Publications Ltd. • Dabrowski, K. (1973). The dynamics of concepts. London: Gryf Publications Ltd.
- • Dabrowski, K. (1996). Multileveness of emotional and instinctive functions. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
- • Kotowska, M. (2009). Juz sie nie boje. Viva!, nr.10, pp.60-68.
- • Laycraft, K. (2006). Positive maladjustment as a transition from chaos to order. Presentation on The Sixth Int. Congress of the Institute for Positive Disintegration in Human Development, Calgary.
- • Laycraft, K. (2009). Positive maladjustment as a transition from chaos to order, Roeper Review Volume -Issue 31, 2, pp. 113-122.
- • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. Toronto, New York, London, Sydney: Bantam Books.
FAQs
AI
What role do emotional and cognitive dynamisms play in personality development?add
The research finds that emotional and cognitive dynamisms significantly shape personality development by instigating complex processes of change, transitioning through states of disintegration and integration.
How does primary integration differ from spontaneous multilevel disintegration?add
Primary integration is characterized by stable self-representation, while spontaneous multilevel disintegration involves emotional and cognitive upheaval, fostering self-awareness and creativity.
What mechanisms contribute to the constructive phases of positive disintegration?add
The mechanisms include critical self-observation, self-awareness, and conscious choices that drive the formation of novel behavioral patterns during periods of instability.
When do individuals typically experience a turning point in self-identity formation?add
Individuals often experience a turning point during phases marked by emotional-intellectual turmoil, leading to profound insights about their identity and motivations.
What feedback loops are identified in the process of disintegration?add
Feedback loops such as feelings of dissatisfaction and guilt create a cycle of disequilibrium that catalyzes the formation of new mental structures.
