! STUDY OF '36
0AUL -ICHAELS PRESENTS THE RESULTS OF HIS INTERNATIONAL
RESEARCH INTO INTERPRETING FOR THE $EAF GAY COMMUNITY
)S A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF 'AY 3IGN 6ARIATION '36
NECESSARY BEFORE ACCEPTING BOOKINGS IN THIS AREA
)N WHILE UNDERTAKING THE 0OSTGRADUATE
#ERTIlCATE IN !DVANCED "3, AND 2ELATED 3TUDIES
AT $URHAM 5NIVERSITY ) WROTE A DISSERTATION ON
THE LINGUISTICS AND SOCIOLINGUISTICS OF 'AY 3IGN
6ARIATION '36 THE DIALECT USED BY SOME $EAF
GAY PEOPLE 4HE FOLLOWING YEAR ) STUDIED FOR THE
0OSTGRADUATE $IPLOMA IN )NTERPRETING WITH THE
$EAF #OMMUNITY IN WHICH ) CONTINUED THE
THEME AND RESEARCHED THE PROVISION OF
INTERPRETING FOR THE $EAF GAY COMMUNITY 4HIS
TOOK ELEMENTS OF THE PREVIOUS lNDINGS AND
RELATED THEM TO THE INTERPRETING PROCESS
-Y AIM WAS TO lND OUT THE VIEWS OF $EAF
GAY PEOPLE AS TO THE TYPE OF INTERPRETER
PROVIDED AND THEIR USE OF '36 AT ,ESBIAN 'AY
"ISEXUAL OR 4RANSGENDER ,'"4 EVENTS AND
ALSO THE TYPES OF EVENTS THESE MAY BE
!DDITIONALLY THE RESEARCH AIMED TO OBTAIN
INFORMATION FROM SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AS
TO THEIR WORKING INVOLVEMENT WITH THE ,'"4
COMMUNITY AND WHOM THEY FEEL IS MOST
APPROPRIATE TO INTERPRET AT EVENTS TARGETED
TOWARDS THIS COMMUNITY ) ALSO WANTED TO TRY
AND ASCERTAIN THEIR KNOWLEDGE AND OPINION ON
THE USAGE OF '36 AT THESE EVENTS
&ACEBOOK WWWFACEBOOKCOM WAS USED
TO lND GROUPS WORLDWIDE THAT RELATED TO
INTERPRETING WITH THE $EAF COMMUNITY AND ALSO
SPECIlC DEAF GAY GROUPS GROUPS WERE
SELECTED WHICH TARGETED $EAF GAY PEOPLE AND
SEVEN GROUPS SPECIlCALLY TARGETING INTERPRETERS
! FEW 9AHOO GROUPS AND ASSOCIATIONS
INCLUDING !3,) AND 3!3,) WERE ALSO IDENTIlED
) CREATED A INTERNET BASED QUESTIONNAIRE AS
THIS WAS AS A SOURCE THAT WOULD ENABLE A LARGE
NUMBER OF PEOPLE FROM EACH GROUP TO BE
SURVEYED IN A TIMELY AND COST EFFECTIVE WAY
4HE PURPOSE OF THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WAS TO TRY TO
CONlRM OR REFUTE THE FOLLOWING HYPOTHESES
▲ ! HIGH PROPORTION OF $EAF GAY PEOPLE WILL
HAVE BEEN TO AN EVENT WHICH WAS
INTERPRETED AND THIS IS LIKELY TO BE A FESTIVAL
WHERE THEY WOULD MOST LIKELY WANT TO SEE
THIS INTERPRETATION CARRIED OUT BY AN , ' "
OR 4 INTERPRETER
▲ -OST INTERPRETERS WILL NOT FEEL THAT
INTERPRETATION AT AN ,'"4 EVENT SHOULD BE
DONE BY AN , ' " OR 4 INTERPRETER
▲ $EAF GAY PEOPLE WILL FEEL THAT INTERPRETERS AT
,'"4 EVENTS DO NOT HAVE A GOOD WORKING
KNOWLEDGE OF '36
▲ -OST ,'"4 INTERPRETERS WILL FEEL THEY HAVE
SOME BUT NOT A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF '36
▲ )NTERPRETERS WILL FEEL THEY DONT NEED TO HAVE
A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF '36 BECAUSE THEY
WILL FEEL THAT '36 IS NOT COMMONLY USED
WITHIN THE $EAF GAY COMMUNITY ANYWAY
▲ -OST RESPONDENTS FROM THE INTERPRETER
.EWSLI ISSUE /CTOBER
#/--5.)49
QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE HETEROSEXUAL AND WILL
NOT HAVE UNDERTAKEN BOOKINGS IN THE ,'"4
DOMAIN BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO
2ESPONDENTS TOTALED INTERPRETERS AND
$EAF PEOPLE WORLDWIDE WHICH WAS AN
ENCOURAGING NUMBER OF INTERPRETERS BUT A
DISAPPOINTING NUMBER OF $EAF PEOPLE 4O GAIN
MORE VIEWS FROM THE $EAF GAY COMMUNITY )
WOULD SUGGEST THAT FUTURE CONSULTATION SHOULD
BE CONDUCTED FACE TO FACE
3URVEY RESULTS
4HE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HIGHLIGHTS A SMALL
SELECTION OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY
1 7HAT TYPES OF SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETED
,'"4 EVENTS HAVE YOU ATTENDED
)NTERPRETER
MEETING CONFERENCE OR SEXUAL HEALTH CLINIC !
LARGER NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS MAY PRODUCE
DIFFERENT lGURES
)NTERPRETERS CLAIMED TO HAVE INTERPRETED AT
A DIVERSE RANGE OF EVENTS -ANY EVENTS WERE
LINKED TO THE ARTS OR SOCIAL EVENTS INCLUDING
COMEDY CHORAL DRAG SHOWS ,EATHER
COMMUNITY CONTESTS COMEDY AND FASHION
SHOWS -ANY POLITICAL EVENTS AND RALLIES AS
WELL AS MEDICAL RELIGIOUS AND EMPLOYMENT
EVENTS WERE ALSO INTERPRETED 4HESE REmECT
MORE OF THE MAINSTREAM EVENTS AT WHICH
INTERPRETERS lND THEMSELVES
1 $O YOU FEEL THAT INTERPRETATION AT
AN ,'"4 EVENT SHOULD BE DONE BY AN
, ' " OR 4 INTERPRETER
)NTERPRETER
$EAF
$EAF
4HERE WAS A FAIRLY EVEN SPLIT BETWEEN THE TYPES
OF DOMAINS THAT INTERPRETERS WERE WORKING IN
WITHIN THE ,'"4 COMMUNITY COMPARED WITH THE
LARGE PERCENTAGE OF $EAF GAY RESPONDENTS WHO
HAD MOSTLY SEEN INTERPRETATION AT 0RIDE EVENTS
4HIS MAY BE A REmECTION IN THE FAIRLY SMALL
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS OF $EAF GAY PEOPLE
WHERE MOST WOULD HAVE BEEN TO A 0RIDE EVENT
BUT MANY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TO A COMMUNITY
4HERE WAS A SIGNIlCANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
INTERPRETER AND $EAF CONSUMER VIEWS REGARDING
INTERPRETATION AT $EAF GAY EVENTS !LMOST OF
THE INTERPRETERS FELT IT WAS NOT NECESSARY
TO HAVE AN INTERPRETER WHO WAS A MEMBER OF
THE ,'"4 COMMUNITY INTERPRETING (OWEVER
ONLY THE $EAF RESPONDENTS FELT THE SAME
WHICH HIGHLIGHTS THAT MORE $EAF GAY PEOPLE
WERE MORE LIKELY TO PREFER AN INTERPRETER WHO
WAS A MEMBER OF THE ,'"4 COMMUNITY
!PPROXIMATELY THE SAME NUMBERS OF
INTERPRETERS AND OF $EAF PEOPLE FELT THEY
DIDNT MIND EITHER WAY IF THE INTERPRETER AT AN
,'"4 EVENT WAS PART OF THE ,'"4 COMMUNITY
-ANY OF THE INTERPRETERS FELT THAT AN INTERPRETER
W W W A S L I O R G U K
#/--5.)49
WHO IS A MEMBER OF THE ,'"4 COMMUNITY
WOULD BE PREFERABLE BUT NOT ESSENTIAL )T WAS
FELT TO BE A SIMILAR SITUATION WHEN AN INTERPRETER
GOES INTO ANY MINORITY OR CULTURAL GROUP AND
HAS SOME AFlNITY WITH THAT GROUP
1 $O YOU THINK THAT INTERPRETERS SHOULD
HAVE A GOOD WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF 'AY
3IGN 6ARIATION AND WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE
'36 USED AT AN ,'"4 EVENT
)NTERPRETER
$EAF
(YPOTHESES RESULTS
)T IS TRUE TO SAY THAT A FAIRLY HIGH PROPORTION OF
THE $EAF GAY PEOPLE HAD BEEN TO AN
EVENT THAT WAS INTERPRETED AND ALSO THAT THIS
WAS A FESTIVAL HAD BEEN TO A 'AY 0RIDE
EVENT BUT INTERESTINGLY A LOWER PERCENTAGE
THAN ANTICIPATED DElNITELY WANTED TO SEE
THIS INTERPRETATION DONE BY AN , ' " OR 4
INTERPRETER n DID NOT MIND EITHER WAY
)T WAS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE THAT MOST
INTERPRETERS FELT THAT INTERPRETATION AT AN ,'"4
EVENT SHOULD BE DONE BY AN , ' " OR 4
INTERPRETER -OST HAD NO VIEW EITHER WAY
WITH A SIGNIlCANT NUMBER SAYING THEY
DISAGREED WITH THE STATEMENT
/RIGINALLY IT WAS THOUGHT THAT $EAF GAY
PEOPLE WOULD FEEL THAT INTERPRETERS AT ,'"4
EVENTS DO NOT HAVE A GOOD WORKING KNOWLEDGE
OF '36 (OWEVER THIS CAN BE QUESTIONED AS A
LARGE PROPORTION OF THIS SMALL SAMPLE FELT
THAT INTERPRETERS DID !PPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE
INTERPRETERS HAD SOME KNOWLEDGE OF '36 BUT
IT WAS SUGGESTED BY MANY IN THE ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS SECTION THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE A
@WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF '36
4HE HYPOTHESIS THAT INTERPRETERS WILL FEEL IT IS
NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR THEM TO HAVE A WORKING
KNOWLEDGE OF '36 WAS REFUTED FELT THEY
SHOULD EVEN THOUGH MANY FELT THEY DID NOT
CURRENTLY HAVE THIS KNOWLEDGE OF '36 3OME
OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS DID SUGGEST THAT
INTERPRETERS FELT THAT '36 WAS NOT COMMONLY
USED WITHIN THE $EAF GAY COMMUNITY
4HE DATA INDICATES THAT MOST RESPONDENTS
FROM THE INTERPRETER QUESTIONNAIRE WERE
HETEROSEXUAL BUT NOT THAT THEY HAD NOT
UNDERTAKEN BOOKINGS IN THE ,'"4 DOMAIN !
SIGNIlCANT HAD UNDERTAKEN SUCH BOOKINGS
)T WAS HOWEVER ACCURATE FROM THE DATA TO SAY
THAT OF THE WHO HAD NOT MOST HAD NOT
HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO n n AND ONLY
CHOOSE NOT TO UNDERTAKE THESE BOOKINGS
#ONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
4HIS RESEARCH IS INITIAL AND ONLY TOUCHES BRIEmY
ON THE SPECIALIST SUBJECT OF INTERPRETING WITHIN
THE $EAF GAY COMMUNITY (OWEVER IT DOES
PROVIDE INTERESTING RESULTS AND THE ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS FROM THE QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES
SHOW THAT THERE ARE CONTRASTING VIEWS RELATED
TO INTERPRETING PROVISION AND ACTIVITY FROM BOTH
INTERPRETERS AND $EAF GAY PEOPLE
7HAT IS EVIDENT IS THAT INTERPRETERS SHOULD
BE AWARE THAT THIS IS A SPECIALIST AREA OF
INTERPRETING SIMILAR TO THAT OF LEGAL MEDICAL
EDUCATION THEATRE AND RELIGION &OR THAT REASON
SPECIALIST PREPARATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF
THE GAY COMMUNITY AND MORE SPECIlCALLY THE
$EAF GAY COMMUNITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
WHEN ACCEPTING BOOKINGS WITHIN THIS AREA
&OR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT
PAULMICHAELS KURTISlNNCOUK
.EWSLI ISSUE /CTOBER