Describe Innovative and Creative Approaches to On-The-Go Learning
2015
…
9 pages
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
As the landscape of technology changes, businesses are seeking the best ways to incorporate on-the-go learning into educating employees. Recognizing this, when using mobile education for knowledge transfer it is beneficial to look at companies successfully implementing such training and what they are doing in terms of utilizing innovation and newest trends of on-the-go learning. The purpose of this article is to offer a snapshot of what is on the forefront of mobile learning and the organizations putting these approaches into practice.
Related papers
A fundamental revolution in higher education is being sparked by the ubiquity of mobile devices used by students, faculty, and administrators. The opportunity is ripe for institutions, instructors, and instructional designers to take advantage of mobile technology to enhance the learning experience. To do this, we need to understand the power on tap, examine fundamental principles, review illustrative examples, and ultimately think through ways to improve the learner experience (Quinn, 2011). In spring 2009, HBS executive education launched a pilot program using iPod Touch mobile devices and a custom application called the “Mobile Nexus” to be used on campus during a six-week executive education program at Harvard Business School. For the first time, participants had real-time access to relevant, time-sensitive information and content from any location within the HBS wireless network (Gorman and others, 2010). Therefore, this paper will focus on methods of mobile learning, the application of mobile learning in higher education and how adult learners will benefit from m learning.
Advances in mobile and distance learning book series, 2012
Today mobile technologies such as cell phones are widespread and multifunctional, mobile broadband coverage has improved considerably in recent years and smartphones are combining more and more capabilities-ranging from telecommunication and video capturing to personal information management (Livingston, 2004);
This paper summarizes a review of literature and a state-of-the-art assessment of instructional design principles, iterative process methodologies, and pedagogical models for mobile learning. The Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Initiative conducted previous research on the effectiveness of mobile course delivery. The implications from that research effort have led ADL to further explore which types of mobile learning require specific pedagogical models and accompanying instructional systems design (ISD) principles. The high level steps of the ISD analysis process may be applicable for specific types of mobile learning such as mobile courses and some types of performance support. Intensive research is needed to consider the ways in which mobile applications and pedagogical approaches can help improve military readiness. Based on the findings from this research study, this paper will provide background learning theory that will ultimately lead to new considerations for supporting mobile learning. Finally, this paper will propose a new framework for supporting mobile learning content within any instructional design (ID) model, but will use the traditional ADDIE model as a starting point.
Since the start of the current millennium, experience and expertise in the development and delivery of mobile learning have blossomed and a community of practice has evolved that is distinct from the established communities of “tethered” e-learning. This community is currently visible mainly through dedicated international conference series, of which MLEARN is the most prestigious, rather than through any dedicated journals. So far, these forms of development and delivery have focused on short-term small-scale pilots and trials in the developed countries of Europe, North America, and the Pacific Rim, and there is a taxonomy emerging from these pilots and trials that suggests tacit and pragmatic conceptualisations of mobile learning. What has, however,developed less confidently within this community is any theoretical conceptualisation of mobile learning and with it any evaluation methodologies specifically aligned to the unique attributes of mobile learning. Some advocates of mobile learning attempt to define and conceptualize it in terms of devices and technologies; other advocates do so in terms of the mobility of learners and the mobility of learning, and in terms of the learners’ experience of learning with mobile devices.
World Conference on Mobile …, 2005
This chapter focuses on an experience of blended learning that is still ongoing for the training of managers of Technological Transfer (TT), who work in an Italian Scientifi c Technological Park (STP). Their main activity is linked to tech- nological transfer. In the STP the technological transfer manager is the key fi gure in the management of the transmission of scientifi c knowledge from the research world to the industrial dimension. The aim of this project is to conduct an experiment in a "Training course for the TT manager" in order to satisfy their training needs. The course is based on a blended learning model, with the use of combined traditional educational methodologies: (1) e-learning methodologies and face to face and (2) m-learning methodologies and face to face. This chapter will focus on the blended m-learning experience.
2014
The use of mobile phones is attracting considerable interest in the fields of professional learning and work-based education. Surprisingly, there is relatively little systematic knowledge about how mobile devices can be used effectively for learning and competence development in work contexts. Many of the current approaches tend to repackage eLearning content in order to make it suitable for the smaller screens of mobile devices-following behavioural and cognitive paradigms. By contrast, we attempt to illustrate in this chapter how mobile devices allow the realisation of rich pedagogical strategies. We use a number of educational parameters to characterise mobile learning (mLearning) as learning across different contexts that bridges and connects: 1) the creation and sharing of content; 2) learning for and learning at work; 3) individual and social forms of learning; 4) education across formal and informal settings, and (5) situated, socio-cognitive, cultural, multimodal and constructivist educational paradigms. We underpin our arguments with empirical studies from different fields and disciplines of work-based education. In so doing, we conclude that, in addition to sporadic, self-contained training, mobile devices can connect and span different situations and forms of learning and, accordingly, support learners across various contexts and phases of their career trajectories. Printed according to environmentally progressive print practices, using chlorine-free, recycled fibres. Electricity used in manufacturing the paper stock has been offset by Green-e renewable energy certificates.
2016
The future of mobile learning (mLearning) in education and training holds much promise, but it also poses many challenges and dangers. In imagining what mLearning may mean to us in the years to come, we should be wary of making predictions. Nevertheless, we can reflect on current and emerging technology and practice and usefully suggest how we might guide their future application and development. In doing so we should be careful not to ignore the lessons of the past, continuing to engage with the deeper questions about teaching and learning that will continue to underlie the application of learning technologies. This chapter is structured primarily as a series of “top fives” under different headings, intended to highlight some of the concerns of mLearning, both now and in the future. These cover mLearning myths and misunderstandings, mLearning innovations, and both the potentials and risks for mLearning in the future. Together these various perspectives on mLearning seek to provide ...
tcrecord.org
Mobile devices and education are not often heard in the same sentence. But that is beginning to change as the ubiquity of the devices presents a strong case for use in transforming the delivery of education and training, as the book's subtitle states. Mobile Learning, edited by Ally, is ...
The growth in mobile devices has brought many opportunities for corporate businesses via mobile learning. However, corporate businesses seem to be slow in capitalising on mobile learning and limited empirical research has been found addressing this. This paper sets out to find the latest on the subject of mobile learning in corporate businesses by reviewing two prominent journal lists relevant to the Business and Information Systems domain; Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) and the Computing Research and Education Association of Australasia (CORE). A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach was used to uncover the current thinking on the subject, including areas of focus and potential gaps. Findings show that highly ranked journals have neither featured mobile learning in the corporate business context nor do they feature any substantial Australian context. This research highlights the gap within literature and brings practical implication for those researching and intending to contribute to this domain.
References (11)
- Kapp, Karl. (2014). 10 Best practices for implementing gamification. https://www.td.org/Publications /Blogs/Learning-Technologies-Blog/2014/02/10-Best-Practices-for-Implementing-Gamification
- Kapp, Kar. (2014).The gamification of mlearning. http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1258/the- gamification-of-mlearning-part-3-of-3
- Freifeld, Lori. (2012) What is experience API? Retreived from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.library .cornell.edu /ehost/detail/detail?vid=7&sid=0b5658d2-03b5-47a2-9974-57670547a6ea%40sessionmgr 110&hid=102&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bth&AN=83755751
- Radwan, Nouran M; Senousy, M Badr; M, Alaa El Din. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e- Management and e-Learning 4.5 (Oct 2014): 361-375
- Najjar, L. J., Thompson, C., & Ockerman, J. J. (1999). Using a wearable computer for continuous learning and support. Mobile Networks and Applications, 4(1), 69-74. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/205074427?accountid=10267
- Bartlett-Bragg, A. (2014). Wearable technologies: Shaping the future of learning. Training & Development, 41(3), 12-14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1548800496?accountid=10267
- Isaias, Pedro; Issa, TomayessView Profile; Pena, NunoView Profile. Journal of Information Systems Education25.1 (Spring 2014): 45-60.
- 9 Casuto, Simon. (2014). How four companies are blending platforms for elearning success. http://elearningmind. com /four-companies-blending-elearning/
- Yokoyama, M. H., & Sekiguchi, T. (2014). The use of social network sites in the workplace: A case study in brazilian companies. Brazilian Business Review, 11(2), 87-114. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1541487881?accountid=10267
- Interview, Brad Bell, Cornell Professor of Training and Development 12 State of the Industry Study: A Pulse on Social Learning. HCM Advisory Group. (2013)
- SkillSoft wins 'best IT content' and 'best social learning tool; named finalist in 5 categories for the best of elearning! awards. (2011, Sep 30). Business Wire Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/894845588?accountid=102
Sebastian Heppner