Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: Authors' reply, naturalistic outcomes paper
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, May 27, 2021
percentage of patients failed to provide follow-up data for this outcome measure? Patients who dr... more percentage of patients failed to provide follow-up data for this outcome measure? Patients who dropped out seem to be more impaired as they had lower physical functioning, higher Work and Social Adjustment Scale scores, and higher depression scores. At baseline, only 52% of patients met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. It would be interesting to know if these patients were overrepresented in the dropouts, given that dissatisfaction with cognitive behavioural therapy has frequently been reported in the chronic fatigue syndrome patient community. It is unfortunate that this paper only mentions the positive results of cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. This is not an accurate reflection of the literature as there are large-scale randomised trials that found little evidence for the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioural approach for chronic fatigue syndrome. Finally, the self-reported global improvement scale used in this study had only six instead of seven options, as is usually the case. Could the authors explain why the option ‘much worse’ was not available in this questionnaire?
Uploads
Papers by Trudie Chalder