Algumas contribuições das teorias dos tempos sociais para refletir a temporalidade laborial; Some contributions of the social times theories for a reflection on the …
Rev. psicol, Jan 1, 2005
... 1 / 1, LILACS, seleciona. para imprimir. Fotocópia. experimental, Documentos relacionados. Id... more ... 1 / 1, LILACS, seleciona. para imprimir. Fotocópia. experimental, Documentos relacionados. Id: 489342. Autor: Aquino, Cássio Adrianno Braz de; Vasconcelos Neto, Aécio de Borba; Pimentel, Érica Maria Lima; Lima, Ítalo Emanuel Pinheiro de; Coelho, Raquel Nascimento. ...
Uploads
Papers by Aecio Borba
on two problems: a) the lack of a consensus about the concept’s coherence with the behavior-analytic explanatory system; and b) the functions of the concept. We argue that behavior analysts have used the concept of private events under the control of phenomena of variable complexity, which might explain the lack of
consensus about its coherence with the behavior-analytic explanatory system. When some sort of consensus about its coherence is reached, it lacks about its instrumentality. Thus, the recognition of coherence and instrumentality of the concept is dependent on the emission of the verbal response “private events” under the control of specifi c classes of events
behavior analysts identify emotions and cognitions as ‘‘private events,’’ we argue with Skinner (1945) that cognitions and emotions are relations among events and that their origin is in public events in the contingencies of reinforcement maintained by other people. Guided by Elias (1939/ 1996), we suggest that the shift from feudal economies to market economies involved the
increasing individualization of society’s members. This individualizing process includes the socially maintained contingencies that bring some verbal responses under control of private stimulation and reduce the magnitude of some verbal responses to a covert level. Behavioral relations in which either stimuli or responses (or both) cannot be observed by others set the stage for a concept of ‘‘privacy.’’ Changes in societal contingencies that gave rise to individualization
and the attribution of privacy to cognitions and emotions are suggested to include the following:
(a) increasing frequency of individual consequences that have no apparent or direct relevance to the group; (b) increasing numbers of concurrent contingencies and choice requirements; (c) conflicts between immediate and delayed consequences for the individual; and (d) conflicts between consequences for the individual and for the group.