Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks, Jan 26, 2023
Purpose: Although social distancing measures enacted during COVID-19 prevented the spread of the ... more Purpose: Although social distancing measures enacted during COVID-19 prevented the spread of the virus and acted as important coping mechanisms during this stressful time, they also contributed to loneliness and anxiety. The pros and cons of social distancing measures were especially relevant among people with disabilities and chronic health conditionsa high-risk group concerned about infection through contact with non-household members and visiting public places like school, healthcare providers, and work. Methods/Approach: Drawing on data from a national online survey (N 5 1,027) and in-depth virtual interviews (N 5 50) with Canadians with disabilities and chronic health conditions, we examine the positive and negative effects of three types of social distancing measuresavoiding public places, transitioning to remote work or school, and avoiding contact with non-household memberson perceptions of increases in anxiety and loneliness during the pandemic. Findings: We find that the relationships between engaging with social distancing measures and anxiety and loneliness could be positive or negative, with measures acting as both adaptive and maladaptive coping mechanisms. Although avoiding public places or non-household members and transitioning to remote work or school often resulted in increased anxiety and loneliness, respondents also described situations where these measures helped them cope with concerns about catching COVID-19. Implications: Our !ndings highlight potential implications for public health policy in allocating different coping resources among marginalized groups during times of crisis and demonstrate the importance of using a social model of stress, coping mechanisms, and mental health.
Uploads
Papers by Andy Holmes