Encypher’s cover photo
Encypher

Encypher

Computer and Network Security

Your Content Carries Its Own Proof of Ownership. We authored the C2PA text standard and built the infrastructure for it.

About us

Invisible cryptographic signatures embedded directly into your content. Text, images, audio, video, documents, and live streams. Survives copy-paste, scraping, syndication, and AI training. When someone uses your content, you can prove it's yours. When they ignore your rights, you can prove that too. Built on the C2PA standard we co-authored (Section A.7, published January 8, 2026). Signing is free. Verification is free. Paste this into encypher.com/tools/verify or download our free Chrome extension to verify this text󠇟󠇠󠇡󠇢󠄧󠆼󠄤󠅜󠄏󠇮︉󠄆󠇭󠄉󠄶󠇆󠆥󠄸󠅪󠄤󠆴󠄫󠄝󠆢󠄿󠆚󠅻️󠇄󠇨󠇆󠄐󠄋󠆂󠆟󠅏󠄟󠇘󠄲︃󠆴󠄸󠄽󠅯.

Website
https://encypher.com
Industry
Computer and Network Security
Company size
2-10 employees
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2025
Specialties
AI Content Authentication, Cryptographic Metadata Embedding, Invisible Digital Watermarking, HMAC-Based Verification, Provenance Tracking, Data Integrity Assurance, Open Source Development, AGPL Licensing, API Integration, Real-Time Streaming Verification, Content Verification Automation, Ethical AI Practices, Digital Rights Management, Compliance & Transparency Solutions, Secure Data Auditing, Provenance & Audit Trails, Technical Documentation & Community Building, Product Innovation in AI Security, and Ethical AI Use

Employees at Encypher

Updates

  • Encypher reposted this

    🚨 34 newspaper publishers. Nearly 400 local outlets. One lawsuit. 🚨 A coalition of local and regional newspapers just sued over how their journalism was scraped to build and power AI products. Buried in the complaint is the detail that matters most: the allegation that copyright management information was STRIPPED OUT! >Author credits. >Publication names. >Copyright notices. The exact signals that say who made a story and who owns it. That is the real wound. Not only that the work was copied, but that its origin was ERASED. Here is the uncomfortable part for every publisher watching this case. A robots.txt file is a sign, not a lock. It sits at your front door and does nothing once a story is copied somewhere else. We audited 457 news sites. More than half earned an F. Four out of five let the answer-writing bot walk right in. 🚩 👉 And one of the publishers in this very lawsuit BLOCKS ALL 13 known AI crawlers, CORRECTLY, and still says its work was taken. Provenance is the other path. You put a cryptographic mark on the story itself, not just a rule on your server. It carries proof of who published the work and when, and it travels with the content across the open web. That gives you verifiable evidence of ownership, instead of a request that stops at your own front door. We could have helped these publishers put that evidence in place before the lawyers got involved. We can still help the next 400. Litigation is the failure mode. Provenance is the prevention. Free 60-second check on your own site: https://lnkd.in/eb3jiA4w Encypher is content authenticity infrastructure built on C2PA, the open industry standard for proving where content comes from. We co-chair the C2PA Text Provenance Task Force. Our job is to give publishers verifiable proof of what their newsrooms created, so ownership is something you can demonstrate, not just claim. If you want to learn more, DM's are open.

  • Encypher reposted this

    I keep meeting publishers who are doing everything they were told to do, and still losing ground. They block the AI crawlers. They keep robots.txt current. They feel protected. So my team pulled the robots.txt of 457 major news sites to see whether that feeling matches reality. It does not. The average site blocks just 5 of 13 major AI crawlers. More than 1 in 3 block none at all. And 4 in 5 leave the door wide open for the crawler that costs them most: the answer bot that reads your story and hands the reader a summary, so they never click through. Here is the part that stuck with me. Sites block the bots that learn from their old archives at a 43% rate, but block the bots that take today's audience at only 30%. Ninety-four sites block OpenAI's training bot and wave its answer bot right in. They are guarding the archive and giving away the audience. We graded every site A to F. Only three earned an A: MSNBC, The Seattle Times, and Publishers Weekly. More than half got an F. robots.txt is a sign on your door. Compliant bots obey it. Everyone else renames themselves, reads a syndicated copy, or ignores the sign. And it tells you nothing about how your work is used once it leaves your site. The durable answer lives in the content itself: a cryptographic stamp that shows who published a story and when, carries your machine-readable license terms, and gives you evidence when your work turns up somewhere else. That is the open standard I help write in the C2PA text task force, and it is what we build at Encypher. The full report, free: https://lnkd.in/eNBeyVpk See your own exposure in one minute, no signup: https://lnkd.in/exFfUcjT #AI #Publishing #ContentProvenance #C2PA #DigitalMedia󠇟󠇠󠇡󠇢󠆍󠄉󠄨󠅽󠄢󠆈󠅳󠄊󠆒󠇉󠇢󠇧󠅔󠆱󠆦󠄕︆󠄎󠅅󠅦󠅄︃︊︆󠆽󠄳󠇨󠆾󠆖󠆤󠇈󠅱󠅊󠄙󠇥󠆤󠄾󠅝󠅝󠆕

  • Encypher reposted this

    Every week, friends and family send me viral clips. A politician saying something outrageous, a cool ad, or just a funny video. The question is always the same: how do I know this is real and not AI? Who do you trust? That is the entire reason we exist. And today, Encypher is part of the answer. This week, we passed C2PA conformance and were added to the official C2PA Trust List as both a Certificate Authority and a Time Stamp Authority. In plain terms: content signed with an Encypher certificate now verifies as trusted in any C2PA-compliant tool, anywhere it travels. We can issue trusted signing certificates to publishers and enterprises, and trusted timestamps, from our own root. C2PA is the standard behind content authenticity at Adobe, Google, Sony, OpenAI, BBC, Microsoft, The New York Times, and hundred of others. You do not apply for a spot on that trust list and receive it. You earn it through conformance, audits, and cryptographic rigor that leaves no room for "close enough." As Co-Chair of the C2PA Text Provenance Task Force, we helped write the text spec. Now we operate full-stack trusted infrastructure for it. The proof of origin our partners embed today is recognized as trusted everywhere it goes tomorrow, for almost any digital asset. We started Encypher to give content a verifiable origin in a world drowning in synthetic media. Becoming a root of trust for that origin is the most meaningful milestone we have hit. To our team, our advisors, and the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) community: thank you. This was a huge milestone. If you sign or verify content and want to understand what trusted C2PA infrastructure unlocks, let's talk. #C2PA #ContentAuthenticity #ContentProvenance #AITransparency #TrustList󠇟󠇠󠇡󠇢󠅕󠇠󠄏󠇄󠄧󠄔󠄸󠇇󠅃󠄏󠇎󠆨󠄧󠆌󠅂󠄔󠅈󠇢󠅁󠆄󠇅󠅳󠅔︂󠆎󠄶󠅓󠆨󠆩󠇕󠄵󠆩󠆷󠆻󠆷︅󠄵󠆚󠆹󠄡

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Encypher reposted this

    The part of David Evan Harris's post that sticks with me: the tools to mark AI text have existed for a while. The reason students, teachers, and readers couldn't use them was a choice, not a technical limit. We built Encypher to make the better choice the easy one. When text is generated, we embed an invisible, cryptographically signed mark directly in the characters. It carries the signed provenance itself, not just a pointer to it, and anyone can check it with an open verifier. That is both the signed-metadata layer and the publicly readable "signpost" the EU's new Code of Practice describes, working today, in plain text. On 2 August, marking AI-generated text in the EU stops being optional. The technology is ready. The standard is here. What's left is the decision to use it. Grateful to David for seeing this early, and for pushing it where it counts. #ContentProvenance #AITransparency #EUAIAct #C2PA #ResponsibleAI󠇟󠇠󠇡󠇢󠄫󠅪󠆅󠄇󠄬󠅕󠆲󠄮󠅸󠄃󠅵󠇍󠅲󠅠󠇊󠆁󠅸󠆜󠅭󠇝󠆔󠅱󠅇󠆅󠅿󠆞󠇠󠄺󠇒󠅜󠅰󠄍󠅯󠄤󠄗󠅺󠆎󠄀󠅪󠇅

    View profile for David Evan Harris

    Business Insider AI 100 | Architect of California AI Transparency Act of 2025 (AB 853) | Interests: Tech Research & Policy, AI, Disinfo, Elections, Social Media, UX | Chancellor’s Public Scholar @ UC Berkeley

    Gaping hole in a great article! I love the The New York Times coverage from Dana Goldstein today of student cheating with AI. There's one gaping hole in this article though—she doesn't talk about the already-available solution for this problem that tech companies have been suppressing, but that is about to be required in the EU: AI text watermarking. The EU will also require that signatories to their ~week-old Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content do not create, promote or advertise the "humanizers" that are discussed in the NYT article. Disclosure: I was part of the Working Group that supported the drafting of this Code, and I suggested this effort to reduce access to humanizers and was very pleased to see this in the final draft (pg 11, link in comments). My hope is that other jurisdictions will follow suit, and that educational institutions like mine (ahem University of California, Berkeley) will block these humanizers from being accessed on their university networks. We'll never be able to make them impossible to find, but we can absolutely put the onus on the cheater to more proactively subvert their own education. The backstory: Since 2011, Google has been using text watermarking technology to mark the outputs of Google Translate outputs, so as to exclude them from training data. OpenAI has had this tech since at least 2023, and the The Wall Street Journal's Deepa Seetharaman did a great article about this, "There’s a Tool to Catch Students Cheating With ChatGPT. OpenAI Hasn’t Released It." (link in comments) I tried hard to include a text watermarking requirement in California law in 2024 and 2025, but OpenAI and Microsoft pushed back harder. It's clear from the WSJ that these companies don't want to lose the paying student cheater market. While students are on tight budgets, many still pay for chatbots. Starting on Aug 2, AI companies operating in the EU will be required to use the latest technology available to watermark AI-generated text outputs. The details of how companies can comply with this are spelled out in the Code. The companies will likely need to use multiple layers of marking to comply. Firstly, they'll likely use the imperceptible watermarks of the type Google has been using since 2011 that make tiny statistical "perturbations" in the frequency of words appearing in their outputs that allow detection through purpose-built tools that won't be available to every cheating student, but will be available to educational institutions checking for cheating and researchers studying AI text in various fora. They will also need to use a more easily detectable form of marking that the Code calls a "signpost." One way to place signposts in AI-generated text is through the use of "non-printing characters." Encypher is a startup using this technique. #AI California Initiative for Technology and Democracy | CITRIS and the Banatao Institute | University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Encypher reposted this

    You scroll past AI-generated images and video every day, and most of the time you can't tell. That is starting to change. OpenAI, Google, and Adobe now stamp the images and video their AI creates with C2PA Content Credentials: a cryptographic record of how a piece of content was made. It is the same open standard Google brought to YouTube to show whether a video was AI generated. The catch is that the record is invisible unless something reads it for you. Encypher Verify does, free, on any website you visit: - One click or page load reveals the Content Credentials behind what you are looking at, including whether it was AI-generated - Works across images, video, audio, and text, 40+ formats in all - Built entirely on C2PA, the open standard the AI industry is adopting - No account, no cost, nothing to set up Knowing what is real should not take a forensics lab or a subscription. It should take one click in your browser. Add it to Chrome: https://lnkd.in/eMxQiSvC #C2PA #AITransparency #ContentAuthenticity #ContentProvenance #ResponsibleAI󠇟󠇠󠇡󠇢󠄅󠅺󠄣󠄅󠆤󠅌󠇪󠇛󠄁󠄘󠆔󠄧󠇊󠅘󠇔󠆻󠄓󠄱󠄸󠇧󠆝󠆒󠄹󠄇󠇪󠆵󠇋󠇡󠄀󠇌󠄦󠅁󠇭󠇥󠄓󠄚󠆂󠇮󠄒︊

  • Encypher reposted this

    "What is C2PA?" I'm a visual learner, so here's the simplest explanation I could make. Most content online has no proof of where it came from. The internet just wasn't built for provenance. Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) changes that: it adds a verifiable "ingredient label" to any file — who made it, how, and whether it's been changed since. So you don't have to trust it. You can check it. Still fuzzy on any of it? Drop your questions in the comments and check out these 5 simple steps below👇 #C2PA #ContentProvenance #ContentAuthenticity

  • Encypher reposted this

    𝗪𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝟮𝗣𝗔 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘀. Independently tested and passed under the C2PA Conformance Program. The most of any single signer product to date. Encypher is proud to now provide conformant singing + verification across 11 image, 3 video, 5 audio, and 1 document formats. The generator security review and the implementation review both passed. In addition, our signing core signs 44 total formats to the current C2PA spec, the 20 the program tests, plus 24 more formats it doesn't cover yet. So we're doing two things at once: shipping what an C2PA has verified, and helping the program build conformance tests for the modalities it doesn't cover yet including live video and the text spec I co-authored into the standard. Conformance turns "we sign content" into "an independent body confirmed we do it correctly, and we're interoperable with the ecyosystem." That's the point of provenance infrastructure: the proof has to be checkable by someone other than the vendor making the claim. Text conformance doesn't exist yet. We're building it for Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) and the Content Authenticity Initiative. We're proud partners. P.S. Thank you to Scott Perry and Sherif Hanna for the reviews and the rigor. The program is demanding on purpose, and the ecosystem is stronger for it. #C2PA #ContentProvenance #ContentAuthenticity #TextProvenance󠇟󠇠󠇡󠇢󠇔󠄅󠇇󠇯󠆷󠇢󠇗󠇆󠄽󠅎󠅗󠇙󠅁󠅉󠇂󠇗︌󠅁󠆎󠅺󠄅󠇝󠄢󠅒󠆯󠄑󠄜󠆎󠄱󠄊󠄯󠅴︅󠄘󠆍󠄣󠅑󠅈󠇇󠄭

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Encypher reposted this

    Appreciate the kind words from Trust In Media Cooperative. Their closing question gets at something we encounter every day in the C2PA standards work: the credibility signals that will matter most are the ones that cannot be separated from the content. Labels can be removed. Most metadata gets stripped during distribution. Terms of service go unread. Every intermediary between origin and destination is a point where context disappears. The C2PA text standard published in January takes a different approach. Cryptographic proof of origin embedded directly in the text. It survives copy-paste, redistribution, and scraping. The provenance travels with the content wherever it goes, regardless of who handles it. That is the infrastructure shift. Not better labels. Provenance that persists. #C2PA #ContentProvenance #AI #Provenance

    As AI-generated content becomes more common online, transparency standards and credibility tools are becoming increasingly important infrastructure for the information environment itself. Our friend Erik Svilich at Encypher has been doing important work in this space through the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA), which is developing open technical standards designed to help establish provenance, context, and authenticity for digital content. The goal is not simply labeling content. It is creating stronger systems for understanding where content came from, how it was created, and whether it has been altered. That matters across sectors. Journalists verifying footage. Businesses responding to reputational incidents. Platforms moderating content. Everyday users trying to determine what information they can trust. Trust does not come from labels alone. It depends on transparency, shared standards, and systems that help people evaluate information with greater confidence and context. What credibility signals will matter most as AI-generated content becomes more widespread? #digitalcontent #AI #C2PA #provenance

  • Encypher reposted this

    The IP question in film is the same question we've been working on in publishing and news: when content can be copied, summarized, scraped, and redistributed at machine speed, how does the creator prove it was theirs? And, how does the EU AI act impact film? Carlo and the CinemaO team assembled 28 contributors across legal, production, technology, and investment to work through this. Proud that Encypher is both a supporter of the publication and a featured case study, the piece we contributed is itself a working demonstration of the technology. The content in the white paper carries cryptographic provenance signatures that anyone can verify. Looking forward to the panel on May 18th at 11:30am at the Marche du Film main stage with Angela Dunning, Bastian Bergmann, Elisa Alvares, and Yannick Bossenmeyer. If you're at Cannes, come find me, we'll also be at the Opening Night at Village Innovation tonight and again on May 17th, 10am!

    View profile for Carlo Rizzo

    🌊Heading back to Cannes🌊 After launching The Black Cube last year at the Innovation Village, CinemaO is back at Marché du Film - Festival de Cannes , this time on the main stage, to present Issue02 of our publication dedicated to FilmTech: ◼️The Future of IP in Age of Machines◼️ 28 contributors. 18 interviews. 5 case studies highlighting companies that are transforming the IP value chain with frontier technologies (some you wouldn’t expect). We have gone deep into one of the most consequential debates in the audiovisual industry today, bringing together perspectives from leading lawyers, producers, technologists and ecosystem builders. If you want to know more, please reach out to schedule a meeting. 🔈Launching 18th May at 11:30, Main Stage, MdF. With a stellar panel including Angela Dunning, Bastian Bergmann, Elisa Alvares, Erik Svilich, Yannick Bossenmeyer - all featured in the publication. 🗓️https://lnkd.in/dRSNvQ2A Full content available on our website after 18th May. Produced in collaboration with Tower Peak Partners and supported by Encypher and Cannes Next Marché du Film - Festival de Cannes (Sten Saluveer). Alessandra Donati Andrea Elisa Pisu Charlotte Lund Thomsen Christina Caspers Irina Albita Jack Jones Jordan Bayne Julien Brunet Katrine Loen Luca Guidobaldi Luna Bianchi Maria Tanjala Mathivanan Rajendran Matt Peplow Nick Mahara Phil McKenzie Dr. Philipp Schiffmann Philippe Rixhon Quentin Bitran Rachael Astin Rune Bjerkestrand William Carbone, MS, MBA william kendall

  • View organization page for Encypher

    330 followers

    The EU AI Act comes into force August 2. Most publishers assume it only applies to OpenAI and Google. It doesn't. If your newsroom uses AI for headlines, summarization, translation, or content recommendations, you qualify as a deployer under the Act. Disclosure obligations apply to you too. The Hamburg court ruling in December made the direction clear: robots.txt is not technical infrastructure. Regulators and courts expect machine-readable proof. Three things publishers should do before August 2: 1. Audit AI tool usage across editorial and distribution workflows 2. Implement C2PA content provenance - free to sign, free to verify 3. Serve formal notice to AI companies that your content carries cryptographic signatures The same infrastructure that satisfies EU compliance strengthens your licensing position. California's parallel requirements take effect the same day. Full breakdown on our blog: Link in comments #EUAIAct #C2PA #ContentProvenance #PublishingIndustry #AIRegulation

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages