Jubilee Homes reposted this
If you think renting will always be smarter than buying, this will annoy you. In the last 30 days, 3.5 million impressions argued about this chart. Nobody mentioned this option. Is it smarter to buy a house or just invest in the S&P 500? The takeaway was simple: if you’d put the same money into the S&P instead of a home, you’d be richer today. Cue the “this is why Millennials are fine renting” narrative. Then came the counter-chatter. Plenty of smart minds from all sides: 👉 S&P 500 - Rent and invest. Homes are bad math. 👉 Homeownership - It’s not just math, it’s stability. Do you know what leverage is? 👉Rational - People should just do what they want. Sam Parr → “Buy because it’s a great emotional investment.” Ramit Sethi → “It’s a lifestyle choice.” Mike Fellman → “Charts ignoring imputed rent are flawed. Owning locks in costs.” Raad Michael Mobrem → “You can’t leverage like you can in housing. Do both.” Richard Wang → “Extremely misleading graph. Ignores too much.” A few sharp folks have dug into this problem before and admitted it’s tough to solve. Why would you not consider using Jubilee? Everyone assumes one outdated rule that you have to lock up 20% down and use a 30yr mortgage And the other issue: people just don’t know about us yet. But that’s exactly what we built Jubilee to fix. We just closed a deal that would’ve required more than $245,000 down. Buyers could afford it, but pulling that cash meant selling investments and paying capital gains. Instead, they put down $25,000. Their monthly payment is about $8,400. 👉 With Jubilee, you buy the home, pay a simple monthly land share, and can purchase the land whenever the timing makes sense. It’s not for everyone. But it’s right for many. And yes. You HAVE TO want to own a home to consider it. Renting will always be cheaper if all you care about is math. Tell me what I’m missing. Why wouldn’t you consider this?