4 Medical Group COOs Share AI Adoption Challenges and Successes

4 medical group COOs walk into a restaurant... No agenda. No pitch deck. Just operators comparing notes on what's actually working with AI in their front offices, and what isn't. A few hours and one dinner later (including a blurry picture), the same themes kept surfacing: 1) The technology is spreading faster than anyone is governing it. Real results in one pocket, ungoverned chaos in another. 2) The right AI tools are getting blocked by interoperability. An intake tool that works fine, sitting on one side of an EMR that won't let data flow. 3) Trust gets built through involvement, not reassurance. Staff don't trust AI because you tell them it's accurate. They trust it when you give them a role in verifying it. 4) And no one has cracked repeatable upskilling. Everyone at the table admitted it. The pattern underneath all of it: the organizations getting AI right aren't the ones with the best tools. They're the ones treating adoption as an operational discipline, not an implementation task. The gap is never where you think it is. It's almost never the product. If your group is stuck somewhere between the pilot that worked and the program that hasn't, come grab a seat at the next Third Way Health Executive Roundtable. Full write-up in the comments.

  • No alternative text description for this image

The 'pilot to program' gap is exactly where most organizations lose their way. I’ve seen the same thing—we treat AI like an IT implementation instead of an operational shift. You're spot on that trust isn't built through 'reassurance'; it’s built through the verification process. When staff see the AI as a tool that supports them rather than a black box that bypasses them, that’s when you actually start seeing the needle move. Great insights from that dinner table

Frederik Mueller, point 1 hits hardest: technology spreading faster than anyone is governing it. That's not a rollout problem it's a structural gap. The organizations getting AI right aren't waiting for the tools to mature. They're building the governance layer first, so every deployment has accountability baked in before it touches a patient interaction. Operational discipline isn't a soft skill. It's the infrastructure. Tina Butler, LMHC | Founder & CEO, MAD PIT | Clinical AI Governance Infrastructure

AI front office tools break when EMR data stalls. Blocked workflows leave medical group tools messy and confusing. We untangle heavy clinical software layouts for fast-growing startups. We engineered the AirAxis dashboard in twenty-six days.

Like
Reply

Well said. Technology alone isn't enough—successful AI adoption comes from strong workflows, trust, and operational readiness.

Adapt or die I think fits, now as ever.

Fully agree, especially on the interoperability front! Great blog post.

The executives look out of focus (picture) 😜

Like
Reply

Thoughtful insight, Frederik, treating AI adoption as an operational discipline makes the challenge feel much clearer. Your focus on governance, trust, and upskilling is especially practical for medical groups.

Like
Reply

Great real-world lens on AI in healthcare ops! Shows how adoption, interoperability, and trust matter far more than the tools themselves.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories