You don't own a single one of your leads. Sounds harsh, but think about it. The day you stop paying the agency, they stop coming. You were renting them the whole time. That's the problem with buying leads. They're someone else's effort, switched off the second the invoice stops. A system is different. It belongs to you. It keeps running whether or not anyone's billing you for it. Leads might fill your inbox for a few months. A system keeps feeding your growth for years. So what goes into one that works? One. Knowing who's ready to buy before they say so. Two. Outreach that speaks to the person's problem, not your product. Three. A loop that tells you each week what's working, so you do more of it. Most companies just keep renting leads. The ones pulling ahead built the engine instead. Worth asking which one you've got right now. If it's the first, that's the part we'd fix. → ethumgroup.com
Ethum’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
"More leads" is the most oversold solution in the home service world. And it's usually the wrong thing to buy first. Every agency pitches the same line: we'll fill your pipeline, we'll flood you with leads. More, more, more. But I've been inside these businesses. The pipeline isn't empty — it's a graveyard. Old quotes that never got a second call. Customers from a year ago nobody followed up with. Leads that came in, got one text, and were never touched again. Turning on new ads before you fix that is like filling a bucket that's full of holes. You feel busy. You're just losing it slower. And here's the part nobody selling "leads" wants to say out loud: a new lead is the most expensive customer you'll ever get. They don't know you, don't trust you, and you paid a platform to reach them. The people already in your CRM know your name and already wanted what you sell. Reaching them costs a message. So I'm not anti-lead-gen. I'm anti-doing-it-in-the-wrong-order. Plug the leaks first. Work the list you already have. Book the jobs already sitting there. THEN scale new leads — into a business that actually catches them. It's a less exciting thing to sell. It just happens to make owners more money. If you run a service business, be honest: how many old leads and quotes are sitting in your CRM right now with zero follow-up? #homeservices #smallbusiness #servicebusiness
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Content alone does not pay the bills. You need a clear path from your post to receiving payment. A lot of business owners post content and then wonder why sales are slow. The truth is simple: Content is only one part of the job. A basic sales path looks like this: Content → Trust → Conversation → Offer → Payment Here’s what each part does: Content This is what people see first. It helps them notice you. Trust This is where they start to believe you can help. Conversation This is where they ask questions, reply, or send a message. Offer This is where you clearly say what you help with and how. Payment This is the part where the sale happens. If one part is missing, the whole thing can break. For example, a service provider may post helpful tips every day, but if there is no clear next step, people may just like the post and leave. Or a consultant may get good views, but if nobody knows what to ask, what to buy, or how to work with them, the views stay as views. That is why posting alone is not a sales system. You need content that leads somewhere. =================== Which part of this path is missing in your business? Comment on the one part you need to fix first. HAPPY NEW MONTH AND WELCOME TO THE SECOND HALF OF THE YEAR. #ContentStrategy #SalesSystem #BusinessGrowth #OnlineBusiness
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
You're not buying leads. You're renting a stranger's attention — and paying every single time you want to talk to them again. Here's the math most advisors never actually run: That $500K-minimum lead you just bought? Someone else already called them. Maybe two other advisors already called them. They don't know you, don't trust you, and have no idea why you're on the phone. So you talk them into an appointment. It might show. It might not. Either way — next month, you're back to buying again. Same cost. Same cold start. Forever. That's not a lead generation strategy. That's a subscription to strangers. Compare that to an owned system: content that pre-sells the conversation before the call ever happens. By the time someone books, they already understand the problem and are half-convinced of the solution — because most of the "selling" already happened before you said a word. One method gets more expensive every year you run it. The other gets cheaper the longer it compounds. If you're currently spending real money on shared or purchased leads — I'd genuinely like to know: Have you ever actually calculated your true cost per appointment over a full year? Comment "RENTED" if you're paying for shared/purchased leads right now. I'll share what I've seen work for advisors who made the switch.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
most home service businesses are chasing new leads while ignoring the goldmine they already have Your database is full of opportunity. Old leads. Lost estimates. Past customers. Email them. Segment by service. Send a relevant offer. It’s that simple. Revive cold leads. Close lost jobs. Drive repeat revenue. No new ad spend. No gimmicks. Just smart marketing. The leads are there. The systems exist. The results are waiting. By the way, I put together a free playbook: 7 proven ways home service businesses are adding $250K–$1M right now. It’s the exact framework we use with $1M–$10M companies. Connect with me & comment PLAYBOOK and I’ll send it over.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A business I worked with was paying good money for leads every month. Then losing nearly half of them to one thing: silence. Not bad leads. Not a bad product. Just nobody getting back to people fast enough. 1 in 5 leads was never contacted at all. The rest often waited hours, sometimes days, while the same person filled in a form at three competitors down the road. We didn't touch their ad budget. We didn't add staff. We changed one thing: every single lead now gets a response within 60 seconds, day or night. 30 days later: → 87% of leads engaged in a real conversation → Booked consultations went from 13% of leads to 47% → 37% of leads came in after hours, and half of those booked while the office was closed Same spend. Same team. 3.6x more qualified appointments on the calendar. Here's the uncomfortable part for most businesses: a lead contacted within 5 minutes is 21x more likely to qualify than one contacted after 30. And 78% of buyers go with whoever responds first. Speed isn't a nice-to-have. It's the whole game. If you're spending on ads but leads are slipping through after hours or over weekends, that's not a lead problem. It's a follow-up problem, and it's fixable.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
A lot of agents believe growth means spending more — buy more leads, run more ads, feed the portals another few hundred a month. Then they wonder why the business feels rented instead of owned. There's a sturdier way: turn the people who already know and trust you into a pipeline that produces year after year. A bought lead is a stranger at the coldest possible moment. A referral shows up pre-trusted, converts faster, and tends to refer again — and unlike paid leads, it compounds instead of stopping the day you stop paying. In a more balanced Las Vegas market this summer, deals don't close themselves. Trust and follow-through are the difference, and that's exactly what a referral carries into the room. I wrote up the system I coach agents on — an organized database, consistent value-driven contact, and a natural way to ask. If you'd rather own your business than rent it, this one's worth ten minutes. Read it here: https://lnkd.in/gmDkw8Hf #LasVegasRealEstate #RealEstateAgents #RealEstateCoaching #ReferralMarketing #NextHomePeopleFirst
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One client said "yes" the moment we increased our price. The surprising part? It was the exact same service. Nothing changed except the price. That experience completely changed the way I think about trust, pricing, and selling. A few weeks ago, we launched a new service. The goal wasn't to maximise profit. It was to build something genuinely valuable and make it accessible to more businesses. So we intentionally priced it well below the market. We believed a better price would make the decision easier. Instead, many prospects became more cautious. Some asked endless questions. Some wanted more proof. Some simply disappeared. At first, I thought the problem was our product. It wasn't. The real problem was trust. Most business owners don't evaluate your offer in isolation. They compare it with every bad experience they've had before. They've worked with agencies that overpromised. They've hired freelancers who disappeared after receiving payment. They've invested in services that looked impressive during the sales pitch but delivered very little afterwards. After experiencing that a few times, people stop buying features. They start buying confidence. That's why case studies matter. That's why Google Reviews matter. That's why testimonial videos and referrals matter. They reduce risk long before the customer decides to buy. Then came the biggest lesson. Sometimes, pricing too low creates more doubt than confidence. Instead of thinking, "That's a great deal." People start wondering, "Why is it so cheap?" "What's the catch?" "Can they really deliver at this price?" So we tried something different. We presented the exact same service to another prospect at a more realistic market price. The product didn't change. The quality didn't change. The value didn't change. Only the price changed. The conversation changed completely. There were fewer objections. More confidence. And the client was ready to move forward. That experience changed the way I think about pricing forever. Being the cheapest doesn't always build trust. Sometimes, it does the exact opposite. Today, we spend just as much time building credibility as we do building our products. Because customers don't buy the cheapest solution. They don't even buy the best solution. They buy the solution they trust the most. Have you ever increased your price and found it easier to close the sale?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Contractors ask me all the time: "Should I just buy leads?" My answer: almost never. And it's not just because of the price tag. Yes, there's the obvious issue — purchased leads get sold to a handful of other contractors at the same time. You're one of five voicemails on that homeowner's phone. And yes, there's the math — you're often paying more per purchased lead than it would cost to generate your own through ads. But here's the reason that actually matters: Buying leads builds nothing. It's a vending machine. Insert money, get lead. Stop inserting money, get nothing. There's no momentum, no compounding, no asset left behind. Running your own ads works differently. Every dollar does two jobs — it generates leads today AND puts your business name in front of your entire service area. Homeowners who don't need you now will remember you when they do. That's brand awareness quietly turning into future pipeline. One approach is a transaction. The other is an investment. If you want to build a real company — not just survive week to week — invest in your own marketing, generate your own leads, and let your brand compound. #Contractors #Marketing #LeadGeneration #BrandBuilding
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If your convert process lives inside your head, you do not own a business. You own a hostage situation with your name on the door. I ask advisors stuck between $600,000 and $1,000,000 to walk me through how a stranger goes from a first touch to a signed engagement, step by step, no skipping. Most cannot get past step 3 without saying some version of and then I jump in. That is the whole problem. Michael Kitces published a piece a while back from guest contributor Michael LaCourse, co-founder of FP Pathfinder, and it hit me square in the chest. Paraphrasing, as your client base grows, the variability from one client to the next makes it nearly impossible to systematize, because every client wants to be treated as an individual. He is right about the tension, and most advisors handle it exactly wrong. They decide the answer is to keep the process in their head because every client is different, so they personalize the front door, the middle, and the back. 27 personas, 27 flavors of the same conversation, and zero scale. The better move is the opposite. Standardize the architecture and personalize the conversation inside it. The convert process is the architecture, the same 5 or 6 steps for every prospect, the same questions in the same order, the same materials at the same checkpoints, the same handoffs and follow-up. The content inside each step is where you flex, and that is where your expertise lives and where the client feels seen. One advisor I coach used to brag that he did everything himself because it kept quality high, and his revenue had been flat for 3 years. We wrote his convert process onto 8 index cards in one afternoon. 8 steps, each with a name, an owner, a tool, and a checkpoint. 9 months later his team was running steps 1 through 5 before he ever walked into the room, he closed more business in those 9 months than in the previous 2 years, and he stopped working Saturdays. The process did not make him generic. It made him available for the parts only he could do. If the only person who can convert a prospect in your firm is you, the value of that firm is capped at your calendar. The harder question: if you sold your firm tomorrow, would the buyer be paying for the process, or paying for you to stay another 5 years? One of those is an asset. The other is an extended employment contract dressed up as a sale.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most owners have more leads than they realise. They're sitting in an inbox, a spreadsheet, a phone note from last month. Someone who enquired, showed interest, nearly bought. And then nothing happened because life got in the way and nobody followed up. The instinct is to go and find more. Run another ad. Post more content. Generate fresh interest. But acquiring a lead costs money. Losing one costs more — you just don't see the bill. The owners who grow aren't necessarily finding more leads. They're converting more of the ones they already have. Not because they're better salespeople, but because something in their business follows up automatically, consistently, without needing to be reminded. A new lead doesn't automatically become a customer. There's usually a gap — sometimes days, sometimes weeks — between first contact and a decision. What happens in that gap determines the outcome. Most of the time, nothing happens. The competition calls. The moment passes. How much revenue do you think is sitting in your old leads right now?
To view or add a comment, sign in
More from this author
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development