The best team environment I've seen came from one simple principle. Pete Carroll with the Seattle Seahawks: "Be who you are and do what you do, as long as you're here for the team." Simple. Powerful. Backed by decades of research. Most coaches try to control how players prepare, how they execute, even how they think about the game. Carroll did the opposite. He encouraged self-initiated action. Supported players' individuality. Validated that each person had something unique to offer. The result? Players loved playing for him and were more motivated to perform because their performance reflected them, not just a system. This isn't just good leadership theory. It's grounded in Self-Determination Theory – one of the most well-validated frameworks in psychology. After three decades of research, the science is clear, people perform at their highest level when three needs are met. 1. Autonomy – control over your path and choices 2. Competence – making measurable progress 3. Relatedness – feeling supported by others When these needs are satisfied, you get autonomous motivation. People do the work because they want to, not because they're told to. When they're not satisfied, you get controlled motivation. People go through the motions. The difference in performance outcomes is massive. I saw this at the Raptors. Players who felt autonomy over their development, competence in their skills, and support from coaches consistently outperformed more talented players who felt controlled. Research on autonomy-supportive environments is consistent: People who perceive their environment as supportive of their autonomy experience more intrinsic motivation, better psychological well-being, and higher performance. Here's what this looks like in practice: Instead of: "Here's your goal for Q4" Try: "What do you think is achievable this quarter? What support do you need?" Instead of: "Follow this exact process" Try: "Here's what success looks like. How would you approach this?" Instead of: "I need you to fix this" Try: "What do you think is causing this? What would you try first?" You're not lowering standards. You're giving people ownership. The executives I work with resist this at first. They think giving autonomy means losing control. But the research shows the opposite. When people feel autonomy, competence, and relatedness, they hold themselves to higher standards than you could ever impose on them. They take ownership. They problem-solve. They persist when things get hard. Pete Carroll's teams consistently outperformed more talented rosters. Not because of scheme or strategy. Because people perform better when they feel in control of their development and supported in their choices. That's what the research predicts. And that's what actually happens.
Encouraging Autonomy and Responsibility
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
I often share this analogy with new leaders: "You can’t grab the steering wheel every time things drift slightly off course." Leadership is about more than correcting every mistake—it’s about fostering autonomy. When we step back and allow others to navigate challenges, we give them the opportunity to learn, grow, and develop confidence. Yes, mistakes will happen, but they’re often the best teachers. By owning both their successes and their failures, people gain the pride and resilience that come with accountability. It’s not always easy to let go, especially when you see a potential misstep. But every time we resist the urge to take over, we build trust, encourage ownership, and empower our teams to solve problems independently.
-
Accountability doesn’t start with asking harder questions. It starts with creating safer conversations. As leaders, we often say we want ownership. But ownership grows only when people feel trusted, not watched. When teams know they can speak up early, admit gaps, and ask for help without fear, responsibility follows naturally. We must be clear about outcomes, not control every step. Clarity gives direction. Autonomy builds confidence. Micromanagement only shifts focus from results to approval. Accountability also means we go first. When things don’t work, we acknowledge our role, share what we learned, and course-correct openly. That permission matters more than any policy. Regular check-ins should be about progress, not policing. Asking “What support do you need?” is often more powerful than asking “Why isn’t this done?” Most importantly, we must reward ownership, not just success. When effort, honesty, and learning are recognised, teams take responsibility even when outcomes are uncertain. Accountability is not enforced. It is built - through trust, clarity, and consistency. And when we lead that way, accountability becomes a shared habit, not a forced rule! #accountability #leadership #trust #ownership
-
Autonomy Turns "Not My Job" Into "I've Got This" Quick truth. The best moments in our company did not come from big speeches or long meetings. They came from someone quietly saying, "I'll handle it," even though it wasn't in their job description. I’ve seen what happens when people feel controlled. They do the minimum. They wait for permission. They protect themselves. But when people feel trusted, the energy shifts: • They think instead of just executing. • They care, not just show up. • They act rather than wait for a green light. In our office, autonomy means ownership. It means trusting people to make calls, learn from mistakes, and move fast. No micromanaging. No fear of blame. Just clarity, respect, and room to think. Some of our best improvements came from team members who noticed minor problems and fixed them before anyone asked. That kind of ownership cannot be forced. It is earned through trust. Control creates compliance. Trust creates leaders. When people feel respected, they stop asking, "Is this my job?" and start saying, "I've got this." What could your team achieve if they felt trusted to lead? #leadership #workculture #trust #autonomy #peoplefirst
-
😠 Wishing your team was "more accountable"? Holding people accountable is an act of yielding power. By definition, it disempowers others. You can’t punish your way to accountability. The best you’ll get is compliance—and what happens when you’re not there to enforce it? If you’re frustrated by what looks to you like "lack of accountability," tightening your grip won’t fix it. More rules, more oversight, more consequences—these might force action, resulting in compliance. Don’t mistake compliance for ownership. People don’t take ownership because they’re pressured to—they take ownership when they feel responsible. And that internal feeling doesn’t come from control; it comes from clarity, autonomy, purpose, and capacity. So instead of demanding more accountability, focus on these leadership levers: 🔎 Clarify expectations—Does everyone actually know what’s expected, why it matters, and how they contribute? 🎮 Give real autonomy—Do people have the power to make meaningful decisions, or just tasks to check off? 📢 Foster psychological safety—Do they feel safe to take risks, speak up, and grow from mistakes without fear? 🎯 Connect to purpose—Do they understand how their work matters beyond just ‘getting the job done’? 🤹♀️ Foster capability-Do they have the resources, skills, and support they need to let their strengths shine? Accountability isn't enforced, it's enabled. If you want a team that owns their work, build a workplace where ownership is possible.
-
There’s one book I give to every direct report. It’s called A Message to García — a 32-page essay that’s more than a century old. It tells the embellished (but true) story of US Army Lieutenant Andrew Rowan, who is sent during the Spanish–American War by President McKinley to deliver a message to Cuban leader Calixto García, who was leading an insurgency against Spanish rule. The problem is Garcia is hidden deep in the jungle and no one knows exactly where he is. What follows is a handbook on initiative and accountability in the workplace. Rowan accepts the mission and relies on his own resourcefulness to see it through independently, without needing constant supervision or instruction on how to find the general. That message connects to one of the fundamental leadership principles we learned at West Point: tell people what needs to be done and why it matters — but don’t dictate how to do it. Some lessons I’ve carried with me: - Clear obstacles, not creativity. Leaders should provide resources and remove barriers, not control every step. - Encourage resourcefulness. Real leadership shows up when the path isn’t obvious and people need to think independently. - Trust scales; micromanagement doesn’t. In high-pressure environments — military or business — the teams that thrive are the ones trusted to solve problems on their own. - Hold high standards, but give space. Accountability and autonomy go hand in hand. Would love to know: how do you balance oversight and autonomy on your teams? (BTW: I know the Garcia story is somewhat controversial — the real details of Rowan’s mission are far more complicated and many readers feel the essay oversimplifies obedience versus strategic thinking. But I think the core lessons around leadership, accountability and initiative are still powerful.)
-
In a recent conversation, a new leader and I explored what truly drives people to perform at their best. She had a team member that was just not delivering, was calling in sick a lot and missing deadlines. We talked about what might be contributing to this behaviour. I believe that in many cases it comes down to three fundamental human needs and whether they are being met: 1. The need to feel COMPETENT 2. The need for AUTONOMY 3. The need for a sense of RELATEDNESS According to Self Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan), when people feel capable, have freedom in how they work, and feel genuinely valued, something shifts. They move from just doing the minimum to being truly engaged in their work. This is the transformational stuff that changes everything. As a leader, here are some actions you can take to create an environment that facilitates intrinsic motivation: 🗣️ Start with strengths – Recognising what people do well builds psychological safety and opens the door to honest, constructive conversations. 🗣️ Clarify the WHY – Purpose reduces resistance and increases energy. When explaining tasks, connect them to multiple perspectives: What's in it for them? For the team? For clients? For the broader community? This clarity is fuel for motivation. 🗣️ Mind your language – Words like "you need to," "you must," "you have to" diminish autonomy and kill intrinsic motivation. Less autonomy = less persistence, creativity, and problem-solving. Respecting these "laws of human nature" isn't just good leadership—it's a rational strategy that reduces friction and inefficiency. When we create environments where people feel competent, autonomous, and connected, we don't just manage performance—we unlock potential. #Leadership #Coaching #EmployeeEngagement #SelfDeterminationTheory #PeopleManagement #IntrinsicMotivation
-
Going on vacation with three kids is harder than running a business. Every store, kiosk, or rest stop brought the same question: “Abba, can you buy this for me?” Sometimes I said no, other times I caved, but either way someone got frustrated. On a recent trip to NYC, I tried something new. I gave the two older kids a set amount of spending money, telling them they could buy whatever they wanted—no interference or judgment from me—and keep whatever they didn’t spend. (My clever oldest immediately negotiated for more, but that's a story for another day...) The result was amazing. The nagging stopped. They strategized, planned, and put toys back if they decided they weren’t worth it. Instead of deciding that they can’t have the stuff they wanted, I found myself trying to convince them that they should spend their money! By the time we reached FAO Schwarz, they had most of their money left and were able to choose incredible toys that they valued far more than the junk they might have gotten earlier. They learned budgeting, and I learned the value of empowerment. These lessons apply to CEOs as well. Trying to control every decision frustrates everyone and creates inefficiencies. Empowering people—whether kids or teams—by setting clear boundaries and giving them ownership fosters accountability, creativity, and better decisions. Leadership isn’t about making every choice yourself; it’s about equipping others to make smart choices and celebrating their success. Whether in parenting or business, trust creates more meaningful outcomes for everyone involved. #ParentingHack #Leadershiphack
-
"I can represent whoever I want and leave early for my daughter's soccer games." That's what my friend/mentee told me about starting her own practice. She was right – but she left out the other half of the story. Last month, she also had to: • Fire an underperforming employee (her first time ever) • Decide whether to take a case that could pay the bills but felt morally wrong • Stay up until midnight worrying about cash flow during a slow period • Choose between investing in marketing or saving for the inevitable dry spell The autonomy she dreamed of? She got it. But it came with a price tag she didn't expect: Every decision becomes yours. Should I hire this person or that person? Do I have enough money to pay my staff this month? Can I afford to turn down this client who makes me uncomfortable? At a big firm, these choices were made for you. Now? They all land on your desk. But here's what I've learned after years of running my own firm: The burden of decision-making is still better than the prison of having no choices. Yes, firm ownership means sleepless nights and tough calls. Yes, your income will go up and down like a roller coaster. Yes, you'll question your sanity at least once a month. But you'll also get to: • Represent clients you believe in • Build the culture you want to work in • Make decisions that align with your values • Leave for your kid's game without asking permission Every lawyer I've helped start their own firm tells me the same thing: "I'm happier than I've ever been, even when I'm stressed." The autonomy is worth the responsibility. Follow for more insights on building a practice that serves your life. #LegalCareer #SoloLaw #LawFirmOwnership
-
High-performing teams don’t thrive on accountability — they thrive on responsibility. Here’s why and how leaders can make this shift. ⬇️ As Jim Dethmer insightfully points out (see his article linked in the comments), when leaders talk about “holding people accountable,” they often mean: 1️⃣ People aren’t doing what they’re supposed to do. 2️⃣ No one is paying attention or enforcing consequences. But here’s the problem — accountability is extrinsic motivation. It relies on pressure, fear, or consequences to drive behaviour. This harms workplace culture, research suggests it can also: 🔸 Erode autonomy: When people feel controlled, resentment grows, well-being declines, and burnout risk rises. 🔸 Hurt performance: High-pressure environments increase anxiety, distracting us from peak performance. 🔸 Weaken engagement: External rewards or punishments undermine stronger intrinsic motivations for doing great work. 🔸 Reduce psychological safety: Fear of embarrassment or punishment discourages risk-taking. So, what works better? Responsibility. Unlike accountability, responsibility is intrinsically motivated. It’s driven by genuine care about the work, the people served, and the outcomes. When we take responsibility, we own our agreements — not because someone is watching, but because they matter to us. As Dethmer says, “Taking responsibility is something I do for myself.” Why does responsibility fuel high-performing teams? ✅ It’s energizing: A sense of ownership fuels motivation instead of draining it. ✅ It improves performance: Without external pressure, people focus better, take initiative, and innovate. ✅ It strengthens culture: When teams act from care rather than compliance, trust and meaning grow. ✅ It fosters long-term collaboration: People naturally manage agreements and repair trust when they fall short. How can leaders build a culture of responsibility, not just accountability? 🔹 Empower, don’t micromanage: Give employees real influence over their work. Trust them to make decisions and innovate. 🔹 Focus on purpose, not competition: Reinforce a shared mission where success is a team outcome, not just individual achievement. 🔹 Create a learning culture, not a blame culture: Replace punitive systems with opportunities to learn from mistakes. 🔹 Offer support, not enforcement: Lead as a coach, not an enforcer. Provide resources, guidance, and mentorship. 🔹 Foster interdependence, not box-ticking: Enable meaningful collaboration where contributions truly matter. By making these shifts, leaders create environments where responsibility thrives — not because it’s imposed, but because it’s owned. Where have you seen accountability fail — and responsibility succeed? Let’s discuss below! 👇 ——— I'm Reuben Rusk 💡 I help leaders enable human flourishing. Follow me + 🔔 for posts on leadership, well-being, and team dynamics. Expand the reach of these ideas by commenting or reposting. #management #accountability #workengagement
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development