A fast analog front-end processor for digital imaging systems
2001, IEEE Micro
https://doi.org/10.1109/40.918002…
7 pages
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
According to Photo Marketing Association International (http://www.pmai.org), high-end consumer and professional applications in a wide range of digital image acquisition systems, such as digital video camcorders, digital still cameras, PC video teleconferencing, digital copiers, and infrared image digitizers, require ever better image quality (http://www. pmai.org/studies/00cps-us.htm). With higherresolution sensors available, the pressure is on the electronic circuitry to handle a large number of pixels at reasonable scan speeds and power consumption. For example, digital still cameras require a minimum of 1 Mpixel/image, and digital video needs 30 frame/s. Another professional application requires the acquisition of a 4-Mpixel high-quality digital picture at 12 frames/s. The current trends in various applications, shown in , will require processing speeds of about 50 Mpixels/s. The increased sensor resolution leads to a smaller pixel size and a lower available signalto-noise ratio (SNR). As shows, a lowresolution image (300 Kpixels, on the left) looks more pleasant than a high-resolution image (1.3 Mpixels, on the right) if the dynamic range is reduced to less than 50 dB. It is a surprising phenomena, but almost all consumer-grade cameras that are 1 Mpixel or higher have this problem. High image quality requires a global SNR better than 60 dB. This SNR is actually close to the sensor capability, which requires better electronic-circuitry performance. shows that actual image quality differs in the dark area between the NC1250 12-bit, 62-dB SNR analog front end (AFE) and the conventional 10-bit, less-than-55-dB SNR AFE.
Related papers
Digital Photography VI, 2010
We introduce a new metric, the visible signal-to-noise ratio (vSNR), to analyze how pixel-binning and resizing methods influence noise visibility in uniform areas of an image. The vSNR is the inverse of the standard deviation of the S-CIELAB representation of a uniform field; its units are 1/ΔE. The vSNR metric can be used in simulations to predict how imaging system components affect noise visibility. We use simulations to evaluate two image rendering methods: pixel binning and digital resizing. We show that vSNR increases with scene luminance, pixel size and viewing distance and decreases with read noise. Under low illumination conditions and for pixels with relatively high read noise, images generated with the binning method have less noise (high vSNR) than resized images. The binning method has noticeably lower spatial resolution. The binning method reduces demands on the ADC rate and channel throughput. When comparing binning and resizing, there is an image quality tradeoff between noise and blur. Depending on the application users may prefer one error over another.
2005
Electronic imaging technologies are faced with the challenge of power consumption when transmitting large amounts of image data from the acquisition imager to the display or processing devices. This is especially a concern for portable applications, and becomes more prominent in increasingly high-resolution, high-frame rate imagers. Therefore, new sampling techniques are needed to minimize transmitted data, while maximizing the conveyed image information.
VLSI Design 2000. Wireless and Digital Imaging in the Millennium. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on VLSI Design
1999
Pixel level processing promises many significant advantages including high SNR, low power, and the ability to adapt image capture and processing to different environments by processing signals during integration. However, the severe limitation on pixel size has precluded its mainstream use. In this paper we argue that CMOS technology scaling will make pixel level processing increasingly popular. Since pixel size is limited primarily by optical and light collection considerations, as CMOS technology scales, an increasing number of transistors can be integrated at the pixel. We first demonstrate that our argument is supported by the evolution of CMOS image sensors from PPS to APS. We then briefly survey existing work on analog pixel level processing and pixel level ADC. We classify analog processing into intrapixel and interpixel. Intrapixel processing is mainly used to improve sensor performance, while interpixel processing is used to perform early vision processing. We briefly describe the operation and architecture of our recently developed pixel level MCBS ADC. Finally we discuss future directions in pixel level processing. We argue that interpixel analog processing is not likely to become mainstream even for computational sensors due to the poor scaling of analog compared to digital circuits. We argue that pixel level A/D conversion will become increasingly popular since it minimizes analog processing, and requires only simple and imprecise circuits to implement. We then discuss the inclusion of digital memory and interpixel digital processing in future technologies to implement programmable digital pixel sensors.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2015
A concept for a novel CMOS image sensor suited for analog image pre-processing is presented in this paper. As an example, an image restoration algorithm for reducing image noise is applied as image pre-processing in the analog domain. To supply low-latency data input for analog image preprocessing, the proposed concept for a CMOS image sensor offers a new sensor signal acquisition method in 2D. In comparison to image pre-processing in the digital domain, the proposed analog image pre-processing promises an improved image quality. Furthermore, the image noise at the stage of analog sensor signal acquisition can be used to select the most effective restoration algorithm applied to the analog circuit due to image processing prior to the A/D converter.
2006
Imaging with a back-illuminated CMOS imager provides a number of advantages, especially as the pixel size is reduced. These advantages include high (1 00%) fill-factor and increased quantum efficiency, efficient implementation of antireflection coatings, improved angular response, availability of the traditional “frontside” of the pixel to incorporate in-pixel processing circuits, and increased compatibility with the next generation metals (e.g Cu) and low-k dielectrics.
2004
Current display devices can display only a limited range of contrast and colors, which is one of the main reasons that most image acquisition, processing, and display techniques use no more than eight bits per color channel. This course outlines recent advances in high-dynamic-range imaging, from capture to display, that remove this restriction, thereby enabling images to represent the color gamut and dynamic range of the original scene rather than the limited subspace imposed by current monitor technology. ...
2012 25th Symposium on Integrated Circuits and Systems Design (SBCCI), 2012
The interest in focal-plane processing techniques, by which image processing is carried out at pixel level, has increased since the advent of active pixel sensors in the middle 90's. By sharing processing circuitry by a group of neighboring pixels such techniques enable high-speed imaging operation and massive parallel computation. Focal-plane image compression is particularly interesting, because it allows for further reduction in data rates. The proposed approach also benefits from processing currents rather than voltages, which not only suits current-mode APS imagers, but also enables the circuits to operate at low voltage supply levels and achieve high speed. Moreover, arithmetic computations such as additions and scaling are easily implemented in current mode. Whereas current-mode imaging architectures produce higher fixed pattern noise (FPN) figures than their voltage-mode counterparts, low FPN can be achieved by applying correlated double sampling (CDS) and gain correction techniques. This work presents a 32 × 32 imaging integrated circuit that captures and compresses gray scale images on the focal plane of the image sensors using analog circuits that implement, for every 4 × 4 pixel block, differential pulse-code modulation, linear transform, and vector quantization. Other processing functions implemented in the chip are CDS, analog convolutions and A/D conversion. Theoretical details and circuit designs are described, as well as the test setup of the chip fabricated in a 0.35 µm CMOS process. Experimental results and photographs captured by the chip are shown to validate the technique. The CMOS imager compresses captured images at 0.94 bits/pixel for an overall power consumption below 40 mW (white image), which is equivalent to approximately 36 µW per pixel. Using photographs taken from bar-target pattern inputs, it is shown that details up to 2 cycles/cm are preserved in the decoded images.
Sensors, Cameras, and Applications for Digital Photography, 1999
Techniques for characterizing CCD imagers have been developed over many years. These techniques have been recently modified and extended to CMOS PPS and APS imagers. With the scaling of CMOS technology, an increasing number of transistors can be added to each pixel. A promising direction to utilize these transistors is to perform pixel level ADC. The authors have designed and protoyped two imagers with pixel level Nyquist rate ADC. The ADCs operate in parallel and output data one bit at a time. The data is read out of the imager array one bit plane at a time in a manner similar to a digital memory. Existing characterization techniques could not be directly used for these imagers, however, since there is no facility to read out the analog pixel values before ADC, and the ADC resolution is limited to only 8 bits. Fortunately. the ADCs are fully testable electrically without the need for any light or optics. This makes it possible to obtain the ADC transfer curve, which greatly simplifies characterization. In this paper we describe how we characterize our pixel level ADC imagers. To estimate QE, we measure the imager photon to DN transfer curve and the the ADC transfer curve. We find that both curves are quite linear. Using an estimate of the sense node capacitance we then estimate sensitivity, and QE. To estimate FPN we model it as an outcome of the sum of two uncorrelated random processes, one representing the ADC FPN, and the other representing the photodetector FPN, and develop estimators for the model parameters form imager data under uniform illumination. We report characterization results for a 640×512 imager, which was fabricated in a 0.35µm standard digital CMOS process.
Opto-Electronics Review, 2006
Infrared sensor designers have long maximized S/N ratio by employing pixel-based amplification in conjunction with supplemental noise suppression. Instead, we suppress photodiode noise using novel SoC implementation with simple three transistor pixel; supporting SoC components include a feedback amplifier having elements distributed amongst the pixel and column buffer, a tapered reset clock waveform, and reset timing generator. The tapered reset method does not swell pixel area, compel processing of the correlated reset and signal values, or require additional memory. Integrated in a 2.1 M pixel imager developed for generating high definition television, random noise is ∼8e-at video rates to 225 MHz. Random noise of ∼30e-would otherwise he predicted for the 5 μm 5 μm pixels having 5.5 fF detector capacitance with negligible image lag. Minimum sensor S/N ratio is 52 dB with 1920 by 1080 progressive readout at 60 Hz, 72 Hz and 90 Hz. Fixed pattern noise is <2 DN via on-chip signal ...
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- The AFE achieves over 50 Mpixels/s processing speed while maintaining an SNR exceeding 60 dB.
- High-quality imaging requires careful management of pixel size and noise, especially with higher resolutions.
- Analog processing techniques, such as horizontal decimation, significantly reduce power consumption during data processing.
- The AFE employs an 8-bit programmable gain amplifier to manage signal amplification across multiple colors.
- Calibration techniques improve image quality by addressing offset errors and ensuring accurate signal representation.
References (2)
- I. Opris et al., "A 12-Bit, 50 Mpixel/s Analog Front End Processor for Digital Imaging Systems," Hot Chips 12 Conference Record, Palo Alto, Aug. 2000; http://www.hotchips.org/index12.html.
- I. Opris, L. Lewicki, and B.C. Wong, "A Single-Ended Input 12-Bit 20MS/s A/D Converter," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-33, no. 12, Dec. 1998, pp. 1898-1903.
FAQs
AI
What performance metrics does the AFE achieve in terms of SNR and power?add
The AFE achieves a global SNR over 63.5 dB and power dissipation between 150 mW and 75 mW at varying speeds.
How does horizontal decimation contribute to power savings in imaging systems?add
Horizontal decimation reduces output data rates from the CDS block, enabling lower clock frequencies and subsequently lower power dissipations.
What is the significance of using a 12-bit ADC in the AFE design?add
The ADC maintains 12-bit accuracy throughout the analog processing chain, essential for optimal image quality and dynamic range.
How does analog white balance differ from digital white balance in image processing?add
Analog white balance prevents color noise in gradients, whereas digital white balance can introduce color bands due to independent color quantization errors.
What technologies were utilized for the system architecture of the AFE?add
The AFE employs 0.35 µm CMOS for analog circuits and 0.18 µm technology for digital signal processing to optimize performance and power.
Ion Opris