Key research themes
1. How effective are conceptual change instructional strategies in improving learners’ understanding in science education?
This research theme investigates the empirical effectiveness and comparative strengths of diverse conceptual change instructional strategies—such as cognitive conflict, cognitive bridging, and conceptual change texts—in promoting conceptual understanding and addressing students’ misconceptions in science subjects like physics and chemistry. It matters because conceptual understanding is foundational for science learning and overcoming persistent pre-instructional misconceptions is challenging, yet essential for deeper and enduring comprehension.
2. How can conceptual frameworks be expanded or transformed to facilitate conceptual change and overcome cognitive fixation in research and learning?
This research theme explores strategies and processes by which individuals and groups can move beyond entrenched conceptual ruts or fixed cognitive patterns, fostering the generation of new perspectives, ideas, and deeper understanding. It is central for conceptual change because expanding or revising conceptual frameworks is a prerequisite for replacing misconceptions or naïve conceptions with scientifically valid concepts across disciplines.
3. What theoretical and semantic considerations underpin the feasibility and nature of conceptual change and meaning change in concepts across disciplines?
This theme focuses on foundational theoretical frameworks and semantic analyses relevant to understanding the mechanics, feasibility, and limits of conceptual (or semantic) change both in philosophy (conceptual engineering) and in scientific theorizing. It explores how meanings of concepts shift over time, the relationship between language and thought, and implications for conceptual engineering efforts aiming at social or epistemic reform.