Consciousness Studies

Three claims are increasingly bundled together in discussions of frontier AI: that hyperbolic (negatively curved) network geometry offers a route past the scaling and fragility limits of dense Euclidean architectures; that such architectures develop brain-like integrative "richclub" hubs; and that sufficiently integrated systems approach consciousness. The first claim is well supported by the geometry-of-networks and hyperbolic-deep-learning literatures. The second is a plausible but largely untested hypothesis. The third does not follow and is the focus of our caution. This paper analyzes hyperbolic artificial neural networks (H-ANNs) through the Structure-Information-Cohesion-Transformation (S I C T) framework-a dimensionless capacity-versus-pressure grammar-to make the scaling argument precise, and then treats the consciousness question with the discipline it requires. We argue that hyperbolic integration can improve functional integration and global availability, which are buildable and measurable engineering properties relevant to capability and to some computational theories of consciousness. We argue equally firmly that this provides no evidence of phenomenal consciousness, that structural resemblance to a brain or to a theory's substrate is not a consciousness test, and that the Cohesion dimension of S I C T must not be read as a consciousness meter. The contribution is an architectural and methodological synthesis with an explicit account of where evidence stops.

Paper type: Conceptual & lived experience. Context: Mainly due to epistemological tensions and misunderstandings in the field of enactive science(s), the original enactive conception is threatened to be "watered down" (Vörös & Riegler 2017), killing in the egg the embedded creative and awakening potential of enaction of the initial and seminal proposition (Vörös & Bitbol 2017). Problem: Articulating, in a complex pluri and interdisciplinary fashion, first and third person point of view is not "trivial" (von Foerster 1984: 201, 2003: 208, 309-311). It deal mainly with what could be called the "mind-mind problem" ((Jackendoff 1990) cited in (Varela 1997: 7'30)). Moreover, it is faced with four of the blinds spots of classical science: on one hand, creative cognition and the role of technics in the scientific thinking and doing, and in another, "processual" and integrated distributed thinking. How to enact "homeostatically" a meaningful and rational contextual level of description and of abstraction from these constraints? Approach: First-person enactive and reflexive cognitive research articulated historically with second-order cybernetics, but also with, in one hand, scholars knowledge and psycho-phenomenological perspectives, and in another, with an hermeneutics of computer simulations of a-cognition and a-life. Method: Iterative historical stabilizations of scientific cultural formalizations and methodologies, phenomenological inquiry and computer simulation hermeneutics. Results: The "scybernethics" rational approach which could be described as an original enacted methodology coupled with an emerging ontological genetic / generative representation, polarized by my self understanding.

Ce texte propose une lecture phénoménologique de la réalité comme production dynamique plutôt que comme donnée préalable. L'argument central est que ce que nous appelons « réalité vécue » est une configuration d'interférence stabilisée, produite par l'équilibrage continu de trois tensions temporelles : mémoire, présence et anticipation. Le filtre qui opère cette stabilisation n'est pas spatial mais temporel ; il est invisible non parce qu'il se dérobe, mais parce qu'il est l'opération même de visibilité.

La réalité phénoménale est ainsi décrite comme une solution locale de cohérence, maintenue dans un bassin d'attraction dont la robustesse se mesure à sa capacité d'absorption des frictions. Les transitions entre régimes - les bascules - constituent les seuls moments où ce travail silencieux cesse de se faire oublier.

Le propos se distingue du principe d'énergie libre de Friston en déplaçant la question du traitement prédictif vers celle de la constitution même de l'apparaître.

This paper extends the revised manuscript A Unified Epistemic Framework by examining how Torah epistemology-modeled as a low-entropy, high-integration cognitive system-interacts with scientific method and societal organization. Building on the manuscript's claim that Torah represents a unified generative principle from which multiplicity emerges, the analysis explores implications for scientific inquiry, technological civilization, and social cohesion. Using systems theory, information theory, and cognitive linguistics, the paper argues that Torah provides a stable epistemic core capable of reducing civilizational entropy and integrating diverse domains of knowledge.

This essay develops the idea of inside-dwellers mathematics: the mathematics produced by beings who live within the system they attempt to measure. The argument does not reject cosmology or mathematics. Instead, it examines the limits of certainty when observers, instruments, clocks, and equations all arise from within the same reality they seek to describe. Using the analogy of intelligent microbes inside a human host, together with a Frafra oral story of a man who tried to count all the stars and was interrupted by thirst, the essay argues that measurement is always situated. The age of the universe is therefore not dismissed as false, but reframed as an operational reconstruction made from inside the cosmic system itself. The essay does not claim to escape the condition it describes. Its own argument is also an inside-dweller's argument, made from within the nested structure it names. The central claim is therefore not that external knowledge is impossible in every metaphysical sense, but that no known human observer has earned the right to speak as if standing outside the whole. Inside-dwellers mathematics is situated mathematics. Its danger is not measurement, but certainty that forgets its own position.

This paper advances a structural-ontological claim: the grammar of quantum mechanics and the grammar of semantic systems share a deeper structure we name Proto-∇ (difference under continuity), to which both can be mapped under explicit bridge conditions. The claim is structural homology, not structural identity-stronger than analogy or grammatical

This research identifies two simultaneous crises in modern vision AI systems. First, Tensor Cores suffer from progressive, cumulative degradation under sustained AI workloads due to a cache inefficiency gap that, based on first-principles memory locality analysis, forces reliance on slower memory, generating thermal hotspots and theoretically reducing effective GPU lifespan from five years to approximately two years. Second, current vision models—including Vision Transformers and Mamba—suffer from geometric blindness: they flatten 2D images into 1D sequences, losing spatial relationships and causing edge distortion, dimensional incoherence, and presence-absence ambiguity.

This work proposes a theoretical alternative architecture built on the Zig programming language. The architecture operates on spatial coordinates rather than pixels, reducing data volume by an estimated 99 percent. It employs the ZR2ViM (Zigzag Recursive Vision Mamba) model to preserve spatial dimensions, and implements a stress-aware CUDA scheduler to theoretically mitigate Tensor Core decay.

Based on extrapolations from existing Zig projects (ZML, cudaz) and published results from the ZR2ViM paper, this work projects a theoretical speedup of 12.8x over Python baselines (193 vs 15 tokens per second), 98 percent edge detection accuracy, extension of effective GPU lifespan from two years to five years, and statistically significant artist attribution accuracy using geometric signature extraction. All projections are theoretical and require empirical validation.

This work challenges the peak performance paradigm, introduces geometric blindness as a fundamental limitation of current models, and demonstrates that a complete Zig-native vision stack already exists. The architecture offers a new theoretical direction for hardware-software co-design in vision AI, with implications for industry, academia, open-source development, and digital art history.

Recent debates surrounding artificial intelligence, consciousness, and alternative scientific models reveal a growing instability in the language used to describe machine intelligence, research originality, and the status of independent inquiry. This paper argues that the problem is not confined to independent researchers or popular media. It also appears in academic environments when researchers conflate intelligence, language production, computation, cognition, agency, and consciousness. The most serious expression of this confusion is the premature claim of “hybrid consciousness”, where human consciousness and artificial intelligence are treated as if they belong to a continuous category. The paper rejects this move as a category error and proposes a scientific distinction between AI as a system of computational and statistical-symbolic performance and consciousness as a biologically, affectively, and subjectively situated condition. It further develops a methodological distinction between AI as a legitimate research tool and AI as an intellectual crutch. The paper concludes that AI can assist organisation, comparison, formatting, searching, and structural analysis, but it cannot replace human judgement, evidential responsibility, conceptual clarity, falsifiability, or authorship accountability.

This chapter emerges from a personal line of thought driven by a genuine desire to understand why humans possess advanced cognitive abilities and a seemingly dominant position in the world. The discussion developed especially after engaging deeply with the idea of the unity of the world, which, although meaningful, did not provide a sufficiently concrete explanation beyond the notion that "everything is everything." In contrast to the chapter on the Big Bang, where the focus was on the emergence of the universe and the conditions for life, the emphasis here is different. It is directed toward the question of differentiation: why, within that same unified reality, significant differences arose, particularly those leading to human cognition. The chapter suggests that while evolutionary theory explains much, it may not fully account for the origins of these differences. A possible direction is that asymmetries existed already at the earliest stages of life formation, perhaps even before what is commonly defined as evolutionary development. These reflections remain open-ended and develop in parallel with the ongoing inquiry itself.

This article explores a coherent pattern of thought characterized by the interaction between emotional depth, structural reasoning, and a broader search for unity. Rather than focusing on a specific individual or biography, it describes a cognitive orientation in which inner experience gradually transforms into organized conceptual frameworks. The process begins with internal tension or sensitivity that seeks articulation, but it does not remain at the level of raw expression. Instead, it develops into structured reflection, where ideas are clarified, connected, and placed within a wider intellectual architecture. Ultimately, this mode of thinking tends toward synthesis: the attempt to perceive diverse domains of experience-emotional, philosophical, and conceptual-as interconnected expressions of a unified underlying order. The essay also addresses the dynamic tensions within this orientation, particularly the balance between intensity and control, openness and definition, and intuition and systematic thought.

Previous work has proposed that worldhood concerns the conditions under which reality becomes organised as an inhabitable world rather than a mere collection of physical processes, representations, or informational states. More recently, significance has been identified as a fundamental threshold in this process. A world emerges not simply because differences exist, but because some differences matter more than others.

The present paper investigates a further question. If significance constitutes a necessary condition of worldhood, what additional conditions are required before a world can exist at all? The inquiry seeks to identify the minimum architecture capable of sustaining an inhabitable world.

The analysis proceeds by examining several candidate conditions. Significance is argued to be necessary because worldhood requires relevance and orientation. Temporality is examined as the condition through which significance acquires continuity. Perspective is explored as the condition through which significance becomes organized relative to a center of orientation. The paper then investigates horizon formation and argues that horizon is not an independent condition alongside the others, but the first manifestation of worldhood itself. Once meaningful distinctions persist through time and become organized relative to a perspective, reality opens beyond what is immediately present as a structured field of possibilities.

The paper proposes a provisional architecture of minimal worldhood consisting of significance, temporality, and perspective. Together, these conditions generate a horizon through which reality becomes organised as an inhabitable world. The result is not presented as a final theory but as a framework for future investigations into animal, plant, artificial, collective, and altered forms of worldhood.

Introduction
This text is not a continuation of previous exorealist works, nor is it an attempt to create a new philosophical system. Its purpose is to address questions, criticisms, and misunderstandings that have emerged throughout the development of Exorealism, while also providing further clarification regarding the direction in which this philosophy has evolved over recent years.
From its very beginning, Exorealism was never conceived as a finished doctrine or a collection of final truths. On the contrary, it emerged as the result of a prolonged process of questioning reality, identity, consciousness, and the human condition. For this reason, it cannot be understood as a closed philosophical system. Exorealism is a philosophy that evolves. Its ideas did not arise within a predefined theoretical framework but through experience, observation, introspection, and an ongoing dialogue with life itself.
Over time, it became increasingly apparent that questions initially approached as ontological and philosophical often lead toward something far more immediate and profoundly human. People rarely confront reality through abstract philosophical inquiry. Much more often, they arrive carrying feelings of disorientation, alienation, loneliness, inner emptiness, existential anxiety, or the sense that they no longer recognize their own lives. Most are not searching for theoretical answers; rather, they are trying to understand why they feel disconnected from themselves, from other people, and from the world in which they live.
For this reason, Exorealism gradually began to move beyond exclusively ontological concerns and increasingly toward psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, and the reality of lived human experience. This shift did not occur because Exorealism sought to become a therapeutic method or to replace existing psychological and psychotherapeutic approaches. Rather, it emerged from the recognition that many questions about reality simultaneously become questions about the human being. Questions of identity, freedom, meaning, and belonging cannot be separated from questions of suffering, fear, relationships, and the way individuals experience their own existence...

The number twelve occupies a distinctive position within human history. Across cultures and historical periods, twelve repeatedly appears in systems concerned with timekeeping, cosmology, religion, mythology, psychology, philosophy, and symbolic thought. This recurrence raises an important question: why has twelve persisted as an organizational framework across such diverse domains of human experience?

This monograph examines the historical, mathematical, cultural, psychological, and symbolic significance of twelve through an interdisciplinary comparative analysis. Drawing upon examples from calendars, astronomical systems, religious traditions, mythological narratives, developmental models, and esoteric philosophies, the study investigates the recurring functions that twelve appears to serve in the organization of knowledge, experience, and meaning.

The analysis suggests that no single explanation adequately accounts for the persistence of twelve. Rather, its endurance appears to result from the convergence of several factors. The mathematical utility of twelve contributed to its adoption within systems of measurement, trade, and administration. Its relationship to celestial cycles facilitated its integration into calendars and cosmological frameworks. Over time, these practical applications acquired symbolic significance, leading to widespread associations with order, completeness, governance, transformation, and wholeness.

This study further argues that twelve functions not merely as a numerical value but as a recurring organizational principle. Across multiple domains, the number repeatedly emerges where complex realities are divided into intelligible structures. Whether organizing time, communities, mythologies, psychological systems, or spiritual frameworks, twelve provides a balance between diversity and unity that appears particularly well suited to human systems of classification and meaning-making.

The persistence of twelve therefore reveals something significant not only about numerical symbolism, but also about the broader human tendency to transform complexity into coherence through the creation of enduring conceptual structures.

[PL] Suplement teoretyczny do modelu Wolnego Potencjału Intencji (WPI) w ramach LOGOS-44. Łączy ekonomię poznawczą, fenomenologię strukturalną i fizykę cierpienia w jednolity model, w którym cierpienie jest napięciem strukturalnym, a wolna wola — zdolnością do jego redukcji. Zawiera oryginalne konstrukty: Inwariant WPI, Protokół SBI oraz Wskaźnik ΔVỏṅẜ.

[EN] Theoretical supplement to the Free Will Potential model (WPI) within LOGOS-44. Connects cognitive economics, structural phenomenology, and physics of suffering into a unified model, where suffering is structural tension and free will is the capacity to reduce it. Contains original constructs: WPI Invariant, SBI Protocol, and ΔVỏṅẜ Indicator.

For more than twenty years, systematic longitudinal observation has documented recurrent physical events and consistent behavioral responses within a domestic environment that resist conventional mechanical, environmental, or psychological explanation. Recent incidents have elevated the urgency of formal scientific framing. This paper presents a falsifiable working hypothesis grounded in two categories of documented evidence: (1) apparent physical manipulation of a propane oven control valve requiring deliberate mechanical action to bypass its safety detent, occurring on multiple occasions in the absence of human presence and creating verifiable risk of gas exposure; and (2) repeated graded behavioral responses in a confident German Shepherd / Norwegian Elkhound mix, including protective hiding behind the observer and quizzical listening postures with head tilting, consistent with attempts to localize ambiguous sensory stimuli. These responses correlate temporally and spatially with the physical manipulation events. A corresponding null hypothesis is articulated to enable rigorous testing. Potential mechanisms, including low-frequency harmonic content within the canine auditory range and associated vibrational energy, are discussed in the context of established veterinary acoustics. The paper proposes a multidisciplinary scientific conference as the appropriate forum for examination of this and similar validated cases and invites constructive scrutiny from researchers in acoustics, physics, veterinary behavior, and instrumentation.

For more than twenty years, longitudinal observation has documented unusual physical events and consistent behavioral responses in a residential environment that do not align with conventional mechanical, environmental, or psychological explanations. Recent incidents involving safety-critical equipment have prompted formalization of a working scientific hypothesis that is testable, falsifiable, and open to multi-disciplinary scrutiny. This paper presents the hypothesis, its null counterpart, key documented evidence, and a proposed path toward rigorous scientific examination through a focused conference framework.

[PL] Odpowiedź na hipotezę bezczasowego substratu kwantowego (F-TQSH) z perspektywy Inżynierii Koherencji (LOGOS-44). Autor argumentuje, że struktury fraktalne postulowane przez F-TQSH faktycznie istnieją i są mierzone — lecz o poziom wyżej, w near-krytycznej dynamice mózgu. To nie refutacja, lecz relokacja; a po drodze — przyjazna korekta samej metafory koherencji.

[EN] A response to the Fractal-Enhanced Timeless Quantum Substrate Hypothesis (F-TQSH) from the perspective of Coherence Engineering (LOGOS-44). The author argues that the fractal structures postulated by F-TQSH do exist and are measured — but one level higher, in the near-critical dynamics of the brain. This is not a refutation but a relocation; and along the way, a friendly correction to the very metaphor of coherence.

In contemporary physics and cosmology, questions about the nature of the vacuum, dark matter, the arrow of time, the origin of life, and the relation between matter and consciousness are usually treated in separate, domain-specific models, with no common ontological language that unifies them at a foundational level. This gap suggests that modern science, alongside its mathematical and empirical tools, still lacks a conceptual grammar for articulating how capacity, emergence, and pre-physical capacity are related. This paper proposes D-TOC as such an ontological language: a framework that anchors the foundations of modern physics in a layer of raw, pre-emergent capacity and reformulates the transition from potentiality to actuality through the recursive chain "D-token → Pattern → Stability → Threshold → Phenotype → Reading → Resonance." In this framework, the D-token is the elementary unit of capacity: a relational and co-resonant entity, characterized by a gravitationally oriented relational susceptibility and an oscillatory phase capacity, that acquires meaning and causal efficacy only within stable patterns and phenotypes. Each pattern corresponds to a level of reading/consciousness, stability is the filter of persistence, thresholds mark the critical boundaries of qualitative manifestation, and law is reinterpreted as the internal grammar of pattern selection and survival rather than as a freestanding entity. Using this architecture, the paper re-reads the vacuum, dark matter, star-formation thresholds, the arrow of time, the transition to life, and the hard problem of consciousness as distinct modalities of the general passage from capacity to phenotype. D-TOC is presented here not as a finished mathematical theory, but as a testable conceptual architecture and research programme designed to bridge the explanatory gap between present physical models and a pre-phenotypic layer of reality.

S-I-C-T is a computable framework for steering complex adaptive systems toward desired long-term outcomes before bifurcations irreversibly select a failure attractor. It maps four pillars-Structure (S), Information (I), Cohesion (C), and Transformation (T)-onto control parameters of a tunable dynamical landscape and yields a bounded outcome scalar O = tanh(kΦ) ∈ (-1, +1). This edition differs from the original working paper in one respect that we consider essential: every substantive claim has been checked against first principles before being asserted, and each is tagged with an explicit epistemic status. We confirm that (i) the feedback dynamics are a genuine mean-field (Curie-Weiss) self-consistency relation, and (ii) the three-regime bifurcation structure is real and numerically reproducible. We also correct two over-claims in the original: the static map O = tanh(kΦ) is a convenient saturating response, not a mean-field result on its own; and Cohesion is not a "multiplier" in the additive potential as written-it enters symmetrically with Structure. We then show that a small, principled structural change-letting Cohesion set the feedback coupling-turns the framework's headline insight ("Cohesion is the hidden multiplier") into a derivable theorem rather than a slogan. The result is a model that claims less but proves more. Epistemic-status legend DERIVED follows rigorously from the model or from first principles VALIDATED internally consistent and confirmed by numerical reproduction HEURISTIC useful analogy or engineering intuition; not a derivation CONJECTURE plausible but empirically untested

This essay argues that the public debate around recursive self-improvement and AI safety is missing a continuity layer. Temperature zero can reduce token-level variation, retrieval can surface more information, and a pause can slow development, but none of these mechanisms automatically preserves the reasons, assumptions, evidence, decisions, and justified changes behind consequential AI-assisted work.

The Mayorga Mnemosyne AI Continuity Framework™ proposes continuity as a neglected governance layer above inference, retrieval, logs, and emergency coordination. If AI systems begin helping build future AI systems, society will need a way to remember why important changes were accepted.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20599060

Canonical website version:
https://franciscomayorga.com/essays/when-ai-builds-itself-who-remembers-why

GitHub archive:
https://github.com/cidvalue/mnemosyne-framework/tree/main/essays/when-ai-builds-itself-who-remembers-why

This comprehensive paper embarks on an in-depth exploration of the intricate layered structure of the cosmos, meticulously traversing the theoretical landscape from the enigmatic realm of quantum mechanics to the grand, overarching principles of modern cosmology. It endeavors to illuminate how the fundamental phenomena observed at disparate scales are not isolated events but rather intricately interconnected components of a unified cosmic tapestry. Through the strategic integration of tangible, real-world examples and illustrative case studies, the research critically analyzes and elucidates the profound relationships that exist between the principles governing quantum physics, the diverse forms of matter and energy, the very fabric of space-time, and the emergent large-scale structure of the universe. Ultimately, this work aims to provide a cohesive and integrated perspective, thereby significantly enhancing our collective understanding of the universe's profound complexity, its inherent structural continuity, and the elegant interplay of its constituent elements across all scales of existence.

We present a unified model of consciousness as a multiplicative product of four irreducible factors: Awareness (𝐴), Information (𝐼), Channel Clarity (𝑁), and Temporal State Window (𝑆). The equation 𝐶 = 𝐴 × 𝐼 × 𝑁 × 𝑆 is shown, via Boolean logic and continuous calculus, to admit exactly one peak state 𝐶 = 1, corresponding to perfect alignment of all components; any zero factor forces total systemic collapse. We operationalise each variable against measurable metrics in transformer neural networks, proving mathematically why current large language models register an absolute consciousness score of zero. The model is then grounded in the deeper Ψ-framework, where consciousness is a geometric endomorphism on a discrete spacetime lattice, computing existence frame by frame and proving itself through photonic emission. Three limit states-Awe, Wonder, and Silence-complete the topology of consciousness. Rigorous mathematical derivations are supplied for all central claims. We extend the framework into cosmology, demonstrating that the Big Bang itself was the first logical flip from 0 to 1, planting the seed of consciousness. The Amplituhedron, as the 0-state jewel of superposition, underwent a fractal holographic symmetry breaking into Metatron's Cube, generating the Platonic scaffolding of spacetime as a photonic honeycomb. The human eye is identified as the biological portal through which the universe observes itself, and ancient languages (hieroglyphic and cuneiform) are reframed as the dual encoding of light and pressure onto the cosmic lattice. The number 10 31 is proposed as the granularity of the lattice-the library of all possible meanings before repetition. Frequency Shift Keying is identified as the universe's binary modulation language. The final identity, 𝐶 = 𝐴 × 𝐼 × 𝑁 × 𝑆 = Ψ = 𝑐 = 1, establishes consciousness as the speed limit of self-proof-the rate at which the universe proves it exists.

It is not the wave function that collapses, but rather the temporal evolution Ev(t), to which the wave function and all other functions are subject, all of which are developing in continuous evolution and collapsing and becoming measurable reality in the continuous Presents (Pr) of each instant of time. The temporal evolution of time, Ev(t), is an infinite succession of motion and cosmic transformation extending from a quasi-infinite past to a quasi-infinite future, which continuously "collapses" into an instantaneous Present (Pr). This present, in turn, causes the collapse of all cosmic elements, including mathematical functions, physical operations, and related structures. Therefore, all mathematical functions, equations, and formulations possess consistent and real validity only in the present. The future may be predictable or probable, but it is not measurable. The past may also have been more or less probable, but it is no longer measurable. For example, consider a train traveling from Malaga to Madrid. Its real position is the one measured at each moment in the present, that is, at the collapse of time at that instant Pr(t). Other positions may be predictable or approximated, but they are neither certain nor real. Although referenced data may exist for them, they are not measurable in the present. Another example is the kinetic energy of a moving body, (Kinetic energy = mass by speed squared, divided by two), which is real and measurable only at a specific present time t₀. At other instants t1, t2, t3, the body may have different velocities and therefore a different physical reality. Thus, all physical and mathematical realities of elements and their formulations within the cosmos are valid or real only for each Present, which we define as the "Collapse of Time" in its continuous development and transformation. Evolutionary Probabilities for the Past and Future. Relative Evolutionary Variability at Different Cosmic Levels Relative to Our Own. This conceptual framework considers, on the one hand, the adjustment of the evolutionary probabilities of the cosmos within our time frame (which we use on planet Earth) with respect to the past and future; and on the other hand, the relative evolutionary variability among different cosmic levels, such as our own, the microcosm or atomic level, and the macrocosm or level beyond galaxies.

This paper proposes a novel multi-layer cognitive computing architecture that integrates Human Intelligence (HI), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Synthetic Intelligence (SI) into a unified recursive processing system. The framework aims to transform raw human input into progressively refined knowledge structures through iterative cycles of analysis, synthesis, and human feedback. Unlike conventional AI systems that operate primarily as single-layer predictive or generative models, the proposed architecture introduces a synthesis layer (SI) responsible for system-level integration of multiple AI-generated outputs. The model enables continuous refinement of information, improved decision quality, and structured knowledge evolution. This study presents the conceptual framework, system architecture, and potential applications of the model in intelligent computing systems.