Threatening Processes

Summary Understanding mechanisms by which agricultural practices affect freshwater ecosystems helps to inform land‐use policies and management strategies aimed at mitigating effects of agriculture on biodiversity. Land‐use activities in the catchment, riparian and local scales likely influence stream fish communities via multiple pathways, for instance, by modifying the instream habitat. We investigated the mechanisms driving local stream fish taxonomic richness and functional diversity in South Brazilian grasslands by testing a theoretical path model in which we specified a priori relationships predicting how land use at multiple scales affects instream habitat and fish communities. Agricultural activities adjacent to streams (i.e. local impact on the streambank) and catchment‐scale cropland area were positively related to macrophyte cover and negatively associated with coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM, i.e. woody debris and leaf litter). Local impact also increased substrat...

Summary Understanding mechanisms by which agricultural practices affect freshwater ecosystems helps to inform land‐use policies and management strategies aimed at mitigating effects of agriculture on biodiversity. Land‐use activities in the catchment, riparian and local scales likely influence stream fish communities via multiple pathways, for instance, by modifying the instream habitat. We investigated the mechanisms driving local stream fish taxonomic richness and functional diversity in South Brazilian grasslands by testing a theoretical path model in which we specified a priori relationships predicting how land use at multiple scales affects instream habitat and fish communities. Agricultural activities adjacent to streams (i.e. local impact on the streambank) and catchment‐scale cropland area were positively related to macrophyte cover and negatively associated with coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM, i.e. woody debris and leaf litter). Local impact also increased substrat...

Running Head: Monitoring checklist for threatened species and communities Highlights Monitoring of threatened species and ecosystems is critical for many reasons Many threatened species and ecosystems are not monitored or are poorly monitored We provide a checklist of factors to guide robust threatened species monitoring We group these factors under four broad themes including design and implementation The themes are interrelated and we develop a conceptual model highlighting linkages *Highlights (for review) Click here to view linked References

A common approach to nature conservation is to identify and protect natural 'assets' such as ecosystems and threatened species. While such actions are essential, protection of assets will not be effective unless the ecological processes that sustain them are maintained. Here, we consider the role of ecological processes and the complementary perspective for conservation arising from an emphasis on process. Many kinds of ecological processes sustain biodiversity: including climatic processes, primary productivity, hydrological processes, formation of biophysical habitats, interactions between species, movements of organisms and natural disturbance regimes. Anthropogenic threats to conservation exert their influence by modifying or disrupting these processes. Such threats extend across tenures, they frequently occur offsite, they commonly induce non-linear responses, changes may be irreversible and the full consequences may not be experienced for lengthy periods. While many managers acknowledge these considerations in principle, there is much scope for greater recognition of ecological processes in nature conservation and greater emphasis on long time-frames and large spatial scales in conservation planning. Practical measures that promote ecological processes include: monitoring to determine the trajectory and rate of processes; incorporating surrogates for processes in conservation and restoration projects; specific interventions to manipulate and restore processes; and planning for the ecological future before options are foreclosed. The long-term conservation of biodiversity and the wellbeing of human society depend upon both the protection of natural assets and maintaining the integrity of the ecological processes that sustain them.

A common approach to nature conservation is to identify and protect natural 'assets' such as ecosystems and threatened species. While such actions are essential, protection of assets will not be effective unless the ecological processes that sustain them are maintained. Here, we consider the role of ecological processes and the complementary perspective for conservation arising from an emphasis on process. Many kinds of ecological processes sustain biodiversity: including climatic processes, primary productivity, hydrological processes, formation of biophysical habitats, interactions between species, movements of organisms and natural disturbance regimes. Anthropogenic threats to conservation exert their influence by modifying or disrupting these processes. Such threats extend across tenures, they frequently occur offsite, they commonly induce non-linear responses, changes may be irreversible and the full consequences may not be experienced for lengthy periods. While many managers acknowledge these considerations in principle, there is much scope for greater recognition of ecological processes in nature conservation and greater emphasis on long time-frames and large spatial scales in conservation planning. Practical measures that promote ecological processes include: monitoring to determine the trajectory and rate of processes; incorporating surrogates for processes in conservation and restoration projects; specific interventions to manipulate and restore processes; and planning for the ecological future before options are foreclosed. The long-term conservation of biodiversity and the wellbeing of human society depend upon both the protection of natural assets and maintaining the integrity of the ecological processes that sustain them.

Developing a standardized approach to measuring the state of biodiversity in landscapes undergoing disturbance is crucial for evaluating and comparing change across different systems, assessing ecosystem vulnerability and the impacts of destructive activities, and helping direct species recovery actions. Existing ecosystem metrics of condition fail to acknowledge that a particular community could be in multiple states, and the distribution of states could worsen or improve when impacted by a disturbance process, depending on how far the current landscape distribution of states diverges from pre-anthropogenic impact baseline conditions. We propose a way of rapidly assessing regional-scale condition in ecosystems where the distribution of age classes representing increasing time since last disturbance is suspected to have diverged from an ideal benchmark reference distribution. We develop two metrics that (1) compare the observed mean time since last disturbance with an expected mean ...

Running Head: Monitoring checklist for threatened species and communities Highlights Monitoring of threatened species and ecosystems is critical for many reasons Many threatened species and ecosystems are not monitored or are poorly monitored We provide a checklist of factors to guide robust threatened species monitoring We group these factors under four broad themes including design and implementation The themes are interrelated and we develop a conceptual model highlighting linkages *Highlights (for review) Click here to view linked References

1. Freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in the River Dee (north-east Scotland) are in decline, and now occur at low densities with poor recruitment levels. The population's deterioration has been attributed to reduced water quality, degraded riverbed habitat and pearl fishing but the specific importance of each of these impacts has not previously been investigated. 2. This study focused on the impacts of artificial structures on the River Dee's freshwater pearl mussel population. Natural hydromorphological features were also included in the analysis. Relationships between the spatial distribution of the freshwater pearl mussel population and 31 explanatory variables were investigated using logistic regression. Three different model selection strategies were compared and contrasted. 3. An absence of freshwater pearl mussels was found to be significantly associated with the following factors: (1) presence of bank protection; (2) proximity of the nearest upstream bridge; (3) presence of a wastewater treatment works; (4) number of upstream tributaries; (5) proximity of the nearest upstream tributary; and (6) presence of sediment deposition. 4. The results strongly suggest that artificial structures on the main stem of the River Dee have contributed to the decline of its freshwater pearl mussel population. Hypotheses are proposed for the causal relationships involved. Requirements for further exploratory analyses, model testing, and experimentation are discussed. 5. This work opens a new line of investigation into the causes of the decline of freshwater pearl mussel populations, providing formal support at a catchment scale for an impact previously identified only on a site-by-site basis.

A common approach to nature conservation is to identify and protect natural 'assets' such as ecosystems and threatened species. While such actions are essential, protection of assets will not be effective unless the ecological processes that sustain them are maintained. Here, we consider the role of ecological processes and the complementary perspective for conservation arising from an emphasis on process. Many kinds of ecological processes sustain biodiversity: including climatic processes, primary productivity, hydrological processes, formation of biophysical habitats, interactions between species, movements of organisms and natural disturbance regimes. Anthropogenic threats to conservation exert their influence by modifying or disrupting these processes. Such threats extend across tenures, they frequently occur offsite, they commonly induce non-linear responses, changes may be irreversible and the full consequences may not be experienced for lengthy periods. While many managers acknowledge these considerations in principle, there is much scope for greater recognition of ecological processes in nature conservation and greater emphasis on long time-frames and large spatial scales in conservation planning. Practical measures that promote ecological processes include: monitoring to determine the trajectory and rate of processes; incorporating surrogates for processes in conservation and restoration projects; specific interventions to manipulate and restore processes; and planning for the ecological future before options are foreclosed. The long-term conservation of biodiversity and the wellbeing of human society depend upon both the protection of natural assets and maintaining the integrity of the ecological processes that sustain them.

The processes that threaten 240 Indonesian threatened plants were identified and categorized based on a comprehensive review of the published literature and elicitation of information from experts. Intrinsic biological factors and habitat loss are the major causes of plant endangerment in Indonesia (affecting 83 and 82% of species respectively), followed by overexploitation (64%) and natural factors (6%). The dominant threats vary between major plant groups, with habitat loss being particularly important for palms and trees, and biological factors important for orchids. For all studied plant species three sets of inter-related threatening processes (threat syndromes) were identified that differed among the major plant groups. By identifying and evaluating the processes that threaten plants in Indonesia we provide knowledge to guide their future conservation.

A common approach to nature conservation is to identify and protect natural 'assets' such as ecosystems and threatened species. While such actions are essential, protection of assets will not be effective unless the ecological processes that sustain them are maintained. Here, we consider the role of ecological processes and the complementary perspective for conservation arising from an emphasis on process. Many kinds of ecological processes sustain biodiversity: including climatic processes, primary productivity, hydrological processes, formation of biophysical habitats, interactions between species, movements of organisms and natural disturbance regimes. Anthropogenic threats to conservation exert their influence by modifying or disrupting these processes. Such threats extend across tenures, they frequently occur offsite, they commonly induce non-linear responses, changes may be irreversible and the full consequences may not be experienced for lengthy periods. While many managers acknowledge these considerations in principle, there is much scope for greater recognition of ecological processes in nature conservation and greater emphasis on long time-frames and large spatial scales in conservation planning. Practical measures that promote ecological processes include: monitoring to determine the trajectory and rate of processes; incorporating surrogates for processes in conservation and restoration projects; specific interventions to manipulate and restore processes; and planning for the ecological future before options are foreclosed. The long-term conservation of biodiversity and the wellbeing of human society depend upon both the protection of natural assets and maintaining the integrity of the ecological processes that sustain them.

1. Australia has a distinct suite of endemic freshwater mussel species, several of which are restricted to southeastern Australia, an intensively modified region supporting much of the nation's population and where pressures on freshwater ecosystems are increasing. 2. Surveys were made of 78 sites in the Hunter River system to determine the distribution and abundance of the six mussel species occurring in the region, to identify threatening processes and to locate populations of high conservation value. 3. Mussel populations were mainly distributed in the hydrologically stable southern Barrington rivers, where those in the Williams River have the highest conservation value. Strongholds for Hyridella drapeta were found in Wollombi Brook. 4. Mussels were not detected at 40% of the sites, some of which supported mussels in the past. These were mainly reaches that have undergone river metamorphosis. 5. Where found, most mussel populations had low densities and were highly fragmented. Major threats to these remnant populations are degradation of riparian and instream condition from agricultural activities, extreme climatic events (flood and drought) and the introduced macrophyte, Salvinia molesta. 6. While threat mitigation can be achieved by habitat protection and strategies to reconnect mussel populations, managers are largely unaware of this invertebrate group. Formal recognition of regionally threatened mussel populations would do much to focus efforts on conservation. 7. The proposed construction of a large dam on the Williams River is a potential threat to the most important mussel populations in the Hunter River system.

Many river restoration projects fail. Inadequate project planning underpins many of the reasons given for failure (such as setting overly ambitious goals; selecting inappropriate sites and techniques; losing stakeholder motivation; and neglecting to monitor, assess, and document projects). Another major problem is the lack of an agreed guiding image to direct the activities aimed at restoring the necessary biophysical and ecological processes within the logistic constraints of on-ground works. Despite a rich literature defining the components of restoration project planning, restoration ecology currently lacks an explicit and logical means of moving from the initial project vision through to on-ground strategies. Yet this process is fundamental because it directly links the ecological goals of the project to the on-ground strategies used to achieve them. We present a planning process that explicitly uses an interdisciplinary mechanistic model of disturbance drivers and system responses to build from the initial project vision to the implementation of on-ground works. A worked example on the Upper Hunter River in southeastern Australia shows how understanding catchment history can reveal disturbance and response mechanisms, thus facilitating process-based restoration.