The cabin was colder on Thursday, but the crew has been able to adjust the temperature.
See full article...
See full article...
Ugh mixing units.the crew started off with temperatures in the mid-70s, but after several “shell heaters” were turned off, it got about 10° C colder
I hope so, otherwise there are some rather baked crew members.Ugh mixing units.
Probably the best place for it.with the spacecraft’s big engine firing behind it
Not sure why that was swapped to Celsius. Changed it back. Thanks for the heads up.Ugh mixing units.
To be fair even Goddard needed a few attempts to figure that one out.Probably the best place for it.
Yes, it is a night side long exposure picture. The Moon is currently pretty much full (98.5%) which means the Sun is “behind” the Earth and Orion is between the Earth and the Moon, hence the bright arc from sun lit side.Is that photo the one described, of the Earth's night side? It can't be, but some of the details mentioned match the image... I'm confused
Laughs in desert southwest summers.Mid 70s is too warm, so dropping 10 degrees seems like a win xD It's 64F/17.8C or lower pretty much always at home.
During the press conference yesterday they gave a very neutered explanation. Reading between the lines and adding info passed along by a friend, I think the network connection is very managed to protect the downlink bandwidth. As a result, Outlook requires a specialized configuration to get to the email server. It either didn't get reconfigured correctly before launch or the configuration got corrupted, so they had to reconfigure it and then it worked fine.No mention of the Microsoft Outlook issue? This is the exact audience that would find it hilarious.
Wiseman, the mission’s commander, sent a particularly spectacular image on Friday morning that showed our planet’s night side (with a relatively long exposure).
You switched it the wrong way though, Fahrenheit doesn't exist in space.Not sure why that was swapped to Celsius. Changed it back. Thanks for the heads up.
Lucky dice roll! I'm under the impression that this is quite common, as many as 1 in 2 or 1 in 3 astronauts on a mission typically end up getting it. Something like that.They held medical conferences with physicians back in Houston, although these were apparently routine since none of the crew members were experiencing space adaptation sickness.
Terrestrial HVAC is also not millimeters separated from a 3° K vacuum.Isn’t temperature control a closed loop system that keeps temperature in a narrow band? Why does it need manual adjustment? And why does that adjustment cause a massive 10 degree change? House/car/hotel room HVAC is better than that at 1/millionth(? pick a number) the cost.
Ok, it's a fair question, but maybe it's the hard vacuum, high radiation, and having a scientific laboratory that's a pace flying on machine that sits on top of explosions bit that makes it complicated and costly and less than ideal...?Isn’t temperature control a closed loop system that keeps temperature in a narrow band? Why does it need manual adjustment? And why does that adjustment cause a massive 10 degree change? House/car/hotel room HVAC is better than that at 1/millionth(? pick a number) the cost.
The crew is now inside a part of Earth's magnetosphere that humans have not visited before: the magnetotail--a comet-like extension of the our planet's magnetic field that stretches millions of kilometers
The magnetotail is extremely dynamic. It whips back and forth in response to solar storms, providing some protection while astronauts are inside and no protection outside. During extreme storms, the magnetotail itself becomes dangerous. Magnetic fields within it can tangle and explode--a process called "magnetic reconnection." (Note: The current storm is not extreme. The crew is still safe.)
Elsewhere, it is reported that the Sun is eclipsed by the earth and that the bright dot is Venus.The Sun is visible in the distance, lighting the far side of the Earth.
It is really sad that at the time Artemis II is flying the US Gov decides to cut the budget for NASA's science directorate by 50%. Makes caring about this mission really hard.I miss Carl Sagan!
The budget hasn’t been cut. The White House’s budget request has NASA cuts in it but Congress can ignore that, just like the last budget.It is really sad that at the time Artemis II is flying the US Gov decides to cut the budget for NASA's science directorate by 50%. Makes caring about this mission really hard.
Maybe it's lit by the full moon?Even with a long exposure, I'm surprised the night side of the Earth looks that bright and detailed. Could some false color have been applied? And, if that is an extended exposure, then the small bright dot can't be the Sun, more likely Venus.
All my space weather web sites are showing strong G3 storms, some new CME impacts occurring.
www.spaceweather.com, Dr. Phillips was pondering the impact of the magnetotail on the mission, the crew is the first to travel through an active magnetotail. Details on how this is being monitored by NASA.
Ideally only half the time, as in The Expanse.Probably the best place for it.
That's correct, people of the Northern Hemisphere are completely unused to seeing their planet 'upside down'.That photo has been confusing me, but I think I figured it out. South pole is near the top, tilted slightly to the right. Eastern South America (basically Brazil) is on the right, and northern Africa (mainly the Sahara) is on the left. Or maybe I'm completely off base. Any other guesses?
I think it's cool how you can see the aurora (or something green) at both the north and south polar regions. And the atmosphere seems particularly well defined.
Flat earth confirmed.Reid Wiseman took this image of planet Earth from Orion