Status
You're currently viewing only Dr Gitlin's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Syonyk inadvertently brings up a good point (and more on purpose): the sociopolitical implications of electrification and transit belong in the Soap Box, not here. There's a general transportation policy thread already underway: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1295963

But we would of course welcome specific threads.

Also, use Leafs are seriously tempting.

I test-drove one, and one word sprang to mind: "uncomfortable". I would rather go full-ebike after driving a Leaf.

The new one or the old one?

By the way, if people have things they'd like us to look at in front page coverage wrt EVs, this thread is a good place to do that.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
By the way, if people have things they'd like us to look at in front page coverage wrt EVs, this thread is a good place to do that.
I would enjoy a review of the Kia Niro Plugin Hybrid. They have a starting MSRP of $27,900. I think it has a large enough battery to qualify for the full $7500 federal tax credit. If California still has a $2500 credit in place, that makes for a very tempting price for a plugin hybrid with some cargo room.

Personally, I'm looking at selling a CR-V and a Leaf (to a good home) and replacing them with something like a Niro or Pacifica and a Model 3.

The Niro PHEV is on the list. I had a regular Niro hybrid in December for a week as it was one of the cars being considered for World Car of the Year (I am one of the current jurors). Expect the review of that one in a week or two.

I'll add the Clarity to the list as well.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
By the way, if people have things they'd like us to look at in front page coverage wrt EVs, this thread is a good place to do that.
I would enjoy a review of the Kia Niro Plugin Hybrid. They have a starting MSRP of $27,900. I think it has a large enough battery to qualify for the full $7500 federal tax credit. If California still has a $2500 credit in place, that makes for a very tempting price for a plugin hybrid with some cargo room.

Looks interesting, though the closest one to me is ~145 miles.

Saw a Bolt in the wild for the first time yesterday here in Austin, and another Model 3.

Surprised you're only just seeing Bolts there now. They are becoming thick on the ground in the DC area.

WRT stop-start, some systems are better than others. In the Alfa Giulia QV, there was enough of a lag that going for gaps in traffic could be difficult. But the system fitted to the Infiniti QX35 and Jaguar F-Pace I tested last year it was very good. Even the McLaren 570S had it. And in a car with only two pedals, even just easing a little pressure off the brake pedal at a stop is usually sufficient to fire the engine up again.

I would think it will become increasingly common as more and more cars move to 48v: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/05/48 ... ns-cheats/
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Smart Mobility? I have no idea what it is but it sounds super hip and cool so clearly I want that!!! :rolleyes:

I still think the sweet spot is the series(ish) hybrid setups, for the next generation of cars.

Come on now, mobility has been the buzzword in the industry for the last two years now. Despite conjuring images of fat people riding rascals in Wal*Mart (or maybe fat people in Wall*E) it's supposed to be a combination of electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, connected cars and infrastructure, and ride hailing.

It's a ridiculous term and that's why you always find me putting it in italics on the front page and referring to it derisively.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Take into account that the modern Leafs are a bit hamstrung, the 2011-2013 Leaf had a (considerably) higher torque motor, especially at low speed, and bit more aggressive pedal tuning.

Huh? If you mean one-pedal driving, I was under the impression from Nissan's behavior at the new Leaf launch that this is very much not the case.

Edit, no you're talking about something else. The pedal remaps depending upon what mode you're in, so there's not just one pedal position/torque map.

BTW when i asked them about a NISMO version the answer I got was that if it did happen here in the US it wouldn't include improvements to the powertrain.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
I would like a small low range electric car, I can charge at home no problem, the vehicle would only get used every so often for 20-30 miles journeys mainly to local nature reserves every so often.

My commute is by bicycle but I cannot lug my camera gear on a bike easily especially in the winter.

I can't see any reasonable options over buying a second hand small petrol car.

Are used BMW i3s as cheap in the UK as they are here in the US?
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Still any doubt that VW Group is committed to BEVs?

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/03/vo ... y-bonanza/

Pretty good, but going by those numbers it seems that even 7 years from now, 75% of their production will still be ICE cars. It was kind of unclear to me whether that 3 million per year figure was for actual EVs or EVs plus hybrids.

The related Bloomberg article (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -car-surge) compares this 25 billion to Tesla’s current 17.5 billion of purchase obligations. It’s a great start to be sure, but I assume there’s more to come if they plan to make 3 million cars a year with decent range. VW Group vehicles tend to be amongst my favourite, so I hope they do well. A long range electric GTI or Audi A5/S5 would be very tempting indeed.

Yes, there is more to come; this announcement was just about supplying batteries for Europe and China. VW says it will tell us about North America in the near future.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Not just that. The crash looks like it was at full speed into the divider.

This could only happen with autopilot. A human driver tends to brake before losing control.

70mph crashes can only happen with autopilot? Have you just never seen the amazing varied ways that humans manage to crash vehicles at speed or are you slagging autopilot in the absence of data for no good reason? How about we wait for actual data before making idiotic proclamations. Speaking of which...

Yeah, but how did this happen in the first place?

It looks like another autopilot error. Remember when that guy was basically beheaded when his Tesla slammed into a tractor trailer sideways? Like that.

You mean the incident where the NHTSA-conducted investigation found that Tesla/Autopilot was not at fault? “A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further examination of this issue does not appear to be warranted.” They further concluded that cars using autopilot crashed 40% less frequently than those without.

So yea, if you’re saying that this recent crash is like that one, you’re saying that autopilot isn’t at fault.

NTSB also investigated the Josh Brown crash, and unlike NHTSA, they absolutely did find problems with Autopilot: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2017/09/nt ... l-s-crash/
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
I don't know what you're on. He's basically paraphrasing the NTSB report.

https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms/search/hitl ... E2E219927F

Exactly. I actually quoted the NTSB report, but Teslaphiles don’t like reading people saying things like the system was allowed to used outside of the operational domain it was designed for. It’s OK, I understand when people become so emotionally invested in a brand that it defines their self-worth. Any negative criticism of the brand becomes a personal attack on their ego. If it didn’t, we wouldn’t have the Battlefront. Hell, I used to be like that about Apple. But we shouldn’t define ourselves by the car we drive, or wish we drove, or the laptop we use, or the games console we play.

In other news, Tesla now says that the Apple engineer who drove head-first into that concrete barrier was using Autopilot: https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/30/1718 ... -statement
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Remote reflashing isn't anything new. GM has been able to do it for a long time with OnStar, they just don't advertise that, and they don't like doing it.
I vaguely recall reading somewhere that the traditional manufacturers' dealership contracts require that software updates be done hands-on in a shop.

You read that from a piece I wrote, I think. And more recently I've been hearing from OEMs that things aren't that bad. (Whether that's because the OEMs are negotiating new contracts, idk). Jaguar is planning to do OTA updates and new features with the I-Pace, GM is planning something similar on some cars soon, and there were a couple of others that told me it's kosher now. Tesla deserves a lot of credit for this, IMO.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
No they were not. I seriously considered hanging on to my Passat TDI until a 3 was available, but the more I learn the less I like it.

Hell I was in a brand new S100D a coworker just bought and I like the interior of my 2012 A4 better. The giant touchscreen was neat but the rest of the car felt pretty meh.

I've been in few new cars with a worse interior than a Model S or Model X. I am honestly surprised the Tesla community hasn't just appropriated the old canard about "you buy an engine from Ferrari and get the car for free" to "you buy a Tesla for the powertrain and get the car for free."
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
W.r.t. the recent OTA discussion, GM's about to start issuing OTA updates for the Bolt.

I'm not that crazy about automotive OTA updates in general, due to the risks, but it looks like it's inevitable that all carmakers will be doing this.

risks from a security standpoint?

i don't like it honestly.
It's the trade offs we make. Tesla's at least hired hackers as employees to find exploits. An they encourage researchers to hack their cars and report it to them, turning around fixes pretty quickly when they're reported (which is the case with the hacks of Tesla's demonstrated so far).

GM works with hackers, it also has an internal red team (I've met them) and a year ago placed cybersecurity on the same level of importance as physical safety testing. It remains to be seen how the GM rollout happens but from personal experience as well as talking to people in the field, cybersecurity is something it (and the industry) are taking a lot more seriously as of the last 18 months.

There are a number of different OTA platforms out there from suppliers; I spoke with both Airbiquity and also Harman about this recently and there are others out there, so that's not a particularly difficult thing to do, and GM has more experience with telematics than anyone else, because of OnStar.

On the other side, I'm also not hearing much concern even from security companies about malicious actors. The attack surface is getting larger, but there are easier targets out there for ransomware—you're more likely to get a hospital to pay ransomware than someone driving a Chevy Bolt.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Why do you do this? Why did you take a discussion about how handling security in an OTA update world and turn it into Tesla vs. GM instead of Tesla and GM?

:confused: no one mentioned Tesla until you held them up as a shining example. "Tesla's at least hired hackers" implies no one else has. I can tell you there's been a sea change in the industry over the last 18 months with regards to this stuff.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Why do you do this? Why did you take a discussion about how handling security in an OTA update world and turn it into Tesla vs. GM instead of Tesla and GM?

:confused: no one mentioned Tesla until you held them up as a shining example. "Tesla's at least hired hackers" implies no one else has. I can tell you there's been a sea change in the industry over the last 18 months with regards to this stuff.

Great. I must have missed the article you wrote on that one, but then again I rarely read the OMG EXPENSIVE ICE CAR ones.

No, you haven't missed it because it's been perpetually on my "need to sit down and actually write this damn thing" list for ages and something always gets in the way. It is coming though.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
trucks live long lives on the road, so a wholesale shift would require an economic incentive for owner/operators to switch. Or at least an economic disincentive to keeping their old trucks on the road. I still see plenty of beat-up old smokers on the road, especially in construction fleets.

Plus there's that whole glider truck loophole...

Like, the traction battery is engineered such that cars reach 200k or more on the original battery. And a replacement on eBay is under $1k.

I mean, if you're looking for high mileage junkyard pull, "better than dead" batteries, sure...

I get an awful lot of people with less than 200k contacting me about battery replacements for various hybrids. It's not a service I offer, though.

Don't expect me to defend commuting in a truck, though. That's quite stupid.

I’m referring more to delivery trucks and buses and why they are not hybrids. Likely it is due to industry inertia and the expense of a new paradigm vs refinements on existing systems.

Btw, here is an example of a hybrid traction battery.

https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre ... 2096644764

There are hybrid heavy duty trucks: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/06/he ... the-trash/
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Model 3 teardown summary. http://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-mo ... tructed-3/

Excellent battery pack, "Tesla doesn't know how to build a car body and wow is this heavy," apparently 165 feet of sealant (which is very high), and (as is entirely unsurprising), very impressive electronics.
While there was praise for the electronics and other innovations in the design it seems the like skeleton - the structure - got a pass with a 'how hard can stamping the structure be?' look. Is it intentionally that heavy and costly? I would imagine not, but I think only further analysis of later builds will be able to prove that out. Maybe there is a method to that design we're not aware of, but it seems puzzling... or they simply made a mistake that they have to live with now.

Yes, they did praise the electronics, but that circuit board that got so much praise is made by Nvidia, not Tesla.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Model 3 teardown summary. http://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-mo ... tructed-3/

Excellent battery pack, "Tesla doesn't know how to build a car body and wow is this heavy," apparently 165 feet of sealant (which is very high), and (as is entirely unsurprising), very impressive electronics.
While there was praise for the electronics and other innovations in the design it seems the like skeleton - the structure - got a pass with a 'how hard can stamping the structure be?' look. Is it intentionally that heavy and costly? I would imagine not, but I think only further analysis of later builds will be able to prove that out. Maybe there is a method to that design we're not aware of, but it seems puzzling... or they simply made a mistake that they have to live with now.

Yes, they did praise the electronics, but that circuit board that got so much praise is made by Nvidia, not Tesla.
Munro said in the video that the chips on the board were Nvidia, but not especially the board.

I am pretty sure it was a Drive PX from Nvidia. Even Electrek acknowledges that Tesla buys them: https://electrek.co/2017/05/22/tesla-nv ... autopilot/
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Ford just gutted their vehicle production of all sedans and compact cars. Pretty incredible.

Either they have big ev plans or they will end up buying more emissions credits from Tesla. Or they’ll lobby a certain GOP administration to do away with those credits.

I’ve written about Ford’s EV plans a few times, most recently last month. It’s not a secret, we know they plan to release six EVs by 2022: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/03/he ... tric-cars/
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Ford just gutted their vehicle production of all sedans and compact cars. Pretty incredible.

Either they have big ev plans or they will end up buying more emissions credits from Tesla. Or they’ll lobby a certain GOP administration to do away with those credits.

I’ve written about Ford’s EV plans a few times, most recently last month. It’s not a secret, we know they plan to release six EVs by 2022: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/03/he ... tric-cars/

the press materials and transcripts say 16, not 6.

No, it said six:

https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedi ... -2020.html

All-in push on hybrid-electrics to bring new capability and features to customers on high-volume, profitable vehicles like F-150, Mustang, Explorer, Escape and Bronco; battery electric vehicle rollout starts in 2020 with performance utility and six BEVs by 2022

Although actually it might be seven.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Ford just gutted their vehicle production of all sedans and compact cars. Pretty incredible.

Either they have big ev plans or they will end up buying more emissions credits from Tesla. Or they’ll lobby a certain GOP administration to do away with those credits.

I’ve written about Ford’s EV plans a few times, most recently last month. It’s not a secret, we know they plan to release six EVs by 2022: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/03/he ... tric-cars/

the press materials and transcripts say 16, not 6.

Attention to detail when it comes to numbers isn’t exactly mister Gitlin's forte.

Link to the press materials: https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedi ... -and-.html

It’s Dr. Gitlin to you.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
And as Eric Bangeman repeatedly beat into me, Ars is a US site so we report on US stuff. Same reason I can't write "whilst" or "colour" or "tyres" or use metric measurements without also including F and hp and ft-lbs and feet and miles. (Although I keep pointing out that the science section doesn't have to use archaic units and no one cares...)
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
And as Eric Bangeman repeatedly beat into me, Ars is a US site so we report on US stuff. Same reason I can't write "whilst" or "colour" or "tyres" or use metric measurements without also including F and hp and ft-lbs and feet and miles. (Although I keep pointing out that the science section doesn't have to use archaic units and no one cares...)

There's a special place in hell for people who use "whilst".

Britain? I guess now Brexit is happening that's true.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
I mean in some way its true, if tomorrow carries on being the same as today then yes they run out of money, but I think Elon might have considered that also.

True, though Musk has committed to using his own cash if need be. Tesla's not going anywhere.

I can't seem to find it now, but I recently read an interesting article comparing Elon Musk to Billy Durant, GM's first CEO. Durant was a whiz as building up the brand, but terrible at building sustainable business. He also always had his hand in many pies at once. The thrust of the article was that Musk needed to find his Alfred P. Sloan to hand the reins of Tesla over to, now that the brand has proved itself, so it can get to the business of mass-producing cars.

I thought it was apt, both in the comparison of Musk to Durant, and the thought that it might be time to really hand over the leadership to a dedicated CEO.

Side note: Durant's boom and bust cycles were so extreme over the course of his career, he bought GM a second time to take over after getting fired by the board, and died managing a bowling alley.

The trouble is, Musk has been borrowing quite a lot against his shares, and with interest rates rising and their share price falling, it could get uncomfortable.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
So, I have a reservation in for the Model 3, but then I received an interesting email from my utilities company - they have a deal with BMW for a discount on an i3 or i3s. A discount to the tune of $10,000. I checked out BMW's configurator and it'd cost just shy of 50K, brought down to 40 with the discount. I would be paying roughly the same for the Model 3 once configured. Federal, state, and trade-in is a wash across both of them, so not factoring them in, but that'd be close to 15K additional.

The biggest catch I can see here is that the battery in the i3 is substantially smaller, with a rough range of 110 miles. My daily commute is around 28 miles round trip. I don't often make long trips either and if I was, I'd be going with people. The i3 has good safety marks and reviews. I also have a local BMW dealer, whereas the nearest Tesla store is around 2 hours away (thanks state gov), so service will be infinitely easier.

What am I missing here? Anyone have experience or info about the i3? I have until the end of July to do this so I'm in no immediate rush, but...

Amazing interior, lots of fun to drive, and would handle your commute easily.

Review of the original one: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2014/12/bm ... he-future/
Review of the bigger battery version: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2017/08/a- ... expensive/

If you can get one with $10k off that solves my remaining problem with the car, which is it’s too expensive.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
After oodles of waiting, I finally picked up my Model 3 today. I don't know if I have much to say that hasn't been covered many times over by this point, but it's pretty damn impressive. The last month or so was an utter mess as basically everything fell apart under the strain of trying to get a rush of cars to us in Canada, so that wasn't particularly pleasant, but the car itself is great. I put on 350 km just bombing around today and already feel spoiled by it.

"Everything fell apart" <-- everything being the car?
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
One day someone will coherently explain to me why it's so very terrible that the Volt can act as a series and a parallel hybrid, and why that means every Volt should be fed into a giant crusher and the resulting cube of scrap dropped into the Challenger Deep.

Until that day, perhaps people can stop letting perfect be the enemy of good.

It's like some fucked up automotive version of the no true scotsman fallacy.


PS: the I-Pace is unbelievably good.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
If it's true, Elon shouldn't tweet or talk about it until it's official. If it's false, it looks really desperate.
I hadn't heard about it until I saw it here, but I don't think he did comment on Twitter based on the CNN article about it. It was a leaked internal communication. Now you can go into conspiracy theory mode and claim it was leaked on purpose or they wanted it leaked, but Elon hasn't spoken publicly about it.

As I wrote last night, Tesla refused to comment on the matter when I spoke to them yesterday.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
How's the I-Pace infotainment? That's quickly becoming one of my biggest demands out of a car, and been one of the biggest step ups from my Volvo.

It's OK but not as good as MMI or the current Volvo Sensus system. Maybe a little behind iDrive, ahead of all but MB's very latest MBUX.

What I don't understand about the i-Pace is that it only gets 240mi rated range. From 90kWh. That is by far the lowest efficiency of any car on the EV market except for the e-NV200, which is a brick on wheels.

I'd expect WLTP range to be in the range of 650-700km (400+ mi) and EPA to be around 350mi at least for such a car.

Because they didn't prioritize aerodynamic efficiency (ie as low-drag as possible) to the extent Tesla has with its cars. 90kWh will still get 240-odd miles of range and with the performance Jaguar wanted. I don't know the CdA for either car, but the Model X has a Cd of 0.24 and the I-Pace is 0.29.
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
I wasn't completely joking, I think this is a good summary of interesting news out of Tesla and certainly worth discussing. I feel like I should be the kind of guy defending Tesla here but... that sabotage story? Really bad look. If it's true, Elon shouldn't tweet or talk about it until it's official. If it's false, it looks really desperate. This is a Trump move: screaming about anything and everything to keep eyes away from what's really going on. Hate to say it.

Huh? It was an internal memo that was leaked to the press. And apparently the guy confessed to the sabotage.

No, he confessed to leaking to Business Insider because he was despondent about the state of Tesla. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... e6c7f02134
 

Dr Gitlin

Ars Legatus Legionis
24,858
Ars Staff
Here at Pikes Peak this weekend to see the VW I.D. R Pikes Peak. Forget real tech transfer, it's a purpose-built prototype racer, but holy shit is it fast. I think there's a decent change Dumas will break Loeb's record (8:13.something), never mind the EV record (8:57.something). Feature should run next week.

Like I said before, just have a secure place for me to mount and power my phone and let that be my GUI, and pass on audio. Done. Better than any system I've seen.

A few years ago I explained at length why that is never going to happen: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2014/06/th ... otainment/
I know, but I also know my preferences. ;)

Tablet with torque, a odb2 plug, a2dp bridge into the audio...

Welp, there's always the aftermarket.

...

Speaking of new vehicles, are you guys going to write up the new Insight soon?

I need to bug the company that manages the Honda fleet in DC and arrange one; realistically even if it's on the fleet already I doubt I'll have time to drive it until August, but consider in the pipeline.
 
Status
You're currently viewing only Dr Gitlin's posts. Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.