Papers by David Buchta
Journal of Vaishnava Studies, 2025
The 18th-century Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava Vedānta theologian, Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa, composed a commentar... more The 18th-century Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava Vedānta theologian, Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa, composed a commentary on the Bhāgavata Purāṇa in which the influence of at least three sources can be demonstrated: Madhva’s Dvaita Vedānta, Śrīdhara Svāmin’s commentary on the Bhāgavata, and especially Baladeva’s own Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition. Baladeva’s commentary, however, does not take the form of a sub-commentary on the works of any of his predecessors and he does not consistently follow their wording or glosses. Rather, as a well-read intellectual, he draws from a variety of sources, including other works from these predecessors, to craft an original interpretation of the text. Thus, his commentary provides a helpful model for the rich forms that “tradition” can take in Sanskrit intellectual culture. This paper examines Baladeva’s commentary on the Bhāgavata Purāṇa’s theologically dense opening verse, identifying sources and sifting through the various strands of influence on Baladeva’s exegesis while highlighting his departures from his predecessors. It thus contributes to the creation of a more nuanced intellectual biography of this early modern Vaiṣṇava theologian, countering earlier, oversimplified claims of his indebtedness to Madhva’s tradition. The paper argues that Baladeva held a consistent theology that was distinctively Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava in many ways. Yet, Baladeva maintained a style that was outward-facing and exoteric. The paper suggests that Baladeva, who played a central role in defending the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition in Jai Singh’s court, sought to engage an audience outside of that tradition and thus avoided the often indulgent and esoteric line of interpretation of his predecessors in the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition.
JOAS
Beginning with Rūpa Gosvāmin (late fifteenth century–1564), at least four poets composed poems in... more Beginning with Rūpa Gosvāmin (late fifteenth century–1564), at least four poets composed poems in the Sanskrit virudāvalī genre that included akṣamayī kalikās, rhythmic compositions wherein each successive segment begins with the letters of the Sanskrit varṇakrama, from a to kṣa, in sequence. The fact that a number of the letters of the varṇakrama rarely or never occur in word-initial position, including the nasals ṅa, ña, and ṇa, the retroflex consonants, the aspirated consonants jha and tha, the anusvāra and visarga, and the vowels ṝ, ḷ, and especially ḹ, creates potential obstacles in the composition of such poems. This paper examines the four known works with these “alphabet poems,” and identifies six strategies that the poets employed in coining epithets beginning with such challenging letters: 1) the use of ekākṣarakoṣas, dictionaries of single-letter words, 2) reference to the shapes of the written letter, 3) onomatopoeia, 4) grammatical derivations, 5) fictitious sandhi-based back-derivations, and 6) metalinguistic puns. The paper thus argues that the difficulty these letters present was, for these poets, a desirable feature of this structure, allowing them to display their learning, whether in service of a royal patron or in a context of Vaiṣṇava devotion.
The Building of Vṛndāvana
Journal of Vaishnava Studies
E ven amongst his immediate followers, the 15 th -16 th century Vaiṣṇava religious leader, Caitan... more E ven amongst his immediate followers, the 15 th -16 th century Vaiṣṇava religious leader, Caitanya, came to be regarded not just as a model of devotion, but as an object of devotion himself, ultimately as a manifestation of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa jointly in one embodiment. The substantial scholarship on the theological doctrines regarding Caitanya and the history of their development, especially the contributions of Tony Stewart including The Final Word (2010), will be well-known to the readers of this journal. Understood in this way, Caitanya has frequently been the focus of stotras (praisepoems) from the time of his direct followers to the present. In fact, I have argued (Buchta 2014: 70-75) that a lack of attention to these stotras is one of the few shortcomings in Stewart's work, who claims, wrongly I think, that the stotra literature "has never had much impact because of its form." (2010: 101) The current paper examines a section of a stotra from much later in the tradition, the akṣaramayī kalikā in Raghunandana Gosvāmin's Gaurāṅgavirudāvalī. As its name suggests (akṣaramayī = "consisting of letters"), this text can be loosely called an "alphabet poem" -that is, a poem wherein the lines begin with each letter of the language, in the standard order in which they are arranged. In Sanskrit, of course, this is not strictly speaking an "alphabet," but rather the basic varṇa-krama or sequence of sounds. In what follows, I will introduce the author, Raghunandana Gosvāmin, and the Gaurāṅgavirudāvalī in which this "alphabet poem" appears. I will then briefly situate this poem in relation to the virudāvalī genre of Sanskrit stotra poetry, specifically discussing its relationship to Rūpa Gosvāmin's (16 th
Journal of Dharma Studies, 2022
Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava thinkers adapted rasa theory to a context of devotion to the god Kṛṣṇa. In doing... more Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava thinkers adapted rasa theory to a context of devotion to the god Kṛṣṇa. In doing so, bhayānaka-rasa , the aestheticized experience of horror, presents interesting complexities. This paper examines the conceptualizations of bhayānaka-rasa by four Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava authors: Rūpa Gosvāmin, Jīva Gosvāmin, Kavi Karṇapūra, and Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa. Between them, they discuss three distinct modes of bhayānaka-rasa in a devotional context: a devotee’s fear after committing an offense against Kṛṣṇa, fear of some dreadful being who the devotee thinks might hurt Kṛṣṇa, and fear of Kṛṣṇa’s display of his cosmic form. This paper also briefly examines the Rūpa’s explicit rejection of the fear felt by Kaṃsa as a case of devotional bhayānaka-rasa . A central concern for the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava authors is whether fear, a typically unpleasant emotion, can attain the status of a rasa and how it is subordinated to more direct forms of devotion. This paper argues that these thinkers make an important contribution to reconceptualizing bhayānaka-rasa , particularly highlighting Jīva’s Gosvāmin’s argument that the real object of bhayānaka-rasa is not the person who serves as the source of fear, but is Kṛṣṇa, out of love for whom such fear is felt.
Journal of Vaishnava Studies, 2021
Journal of Vaishnava Studies, 2018
Jīva Gosvāmin
Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets
According to a consensus amongst early Vedānta traditions, elaborated in commentaries on the Brah... more According to a consensus amongst early Vedānta traditions, elaborated in commentaries on the Brahmasūtra 4.1.13-19, accumulated karman is destroyed and no further karman accrues after the attainment of knowledge of Brahman. The only exception is that karman which is already beginning to manifest its results (prārabdha-karman), which can only be exhausted through experiencing those results. The late Vaiṣṇava Vedāntins Viṭṭhalanātha (1516–1586) and Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa (ca. 1700–1793), however, insist that there can be no limitations on the absolute will of the Lord, and argue that some devotees can be freed of even prārabdha-karman without experiencing its results by the Lord’s grace. Through clever exegesis, they read this theory into the Brahmasūtra passage in question. This article examines their exegesis and highlights the influence of Viṭṭhalanātha on Baladeva, noting also the seeds of this theory in a poem of Baladeva’s predecessor, Rūpa Gosvāmin.
This paper examines the Vaiṣṇava Vedānta theologian Madhva's statements on the agency of the indi... more This paper examines the Vaiṣṇava Vedānta theologian Madhva's statements on the agency of the individual self. Going against the grain of much of the Indian philosophical discourse on the topic, Madhva asserts that the self has agency despite being dependent on the will of God. As an aspect of this dependence, Madhva describes a deterministic heirarchy of selves. The eternal inherent nature of each self is determined by God. Finally, the paper considers claims made by earlier scholars that Madhva's system offers a satisfactory theodicy, and considers the influence that Madhva may have had on later Indian thinkers.
The word rasa within the Hindu context, specifically for certain devotional bhakti traditions, ha... more The word rasa within the Hindu context, specifically for certain devotional bhakti traditions, has come to refer to the ultimate experience of a transcendent and perfect love. This love engages pure
Premchand's Rāmacarcā is a retelling of the Rāma story as a Hindi novel. This paper focuses on th... more Premchand's Rāmacarcā is a retelling of the Rāma story as a Hindi novel. This paper focuses on three episodes involving Sītā: the fire ordeal Sītā is asked to undergo to prove her purity, Rāma's abandonment of Sītā, and the second test of Sītā's purity. Premchand's treatment of these episodes is analyzed against the background of his own concerns about social injustices and his leanings toward atheism. Premchand's Rāma is not divine and his abandonment of Sītā in order to set an example for his kingdom is presented as the lesser of two evils. Yet in spite of the almost unqualified valorization of Rāma, a quiet critique is heard through the voice of Sītā, suggesting the need for a change in the societal suspicion of women.
The Journal of Hindu Studies, Jan 1, 2010
This paper offers an intellectual biography of the 18th-century Vaiṣṇava Vedāntin, Baladeva Vidyā... more This paper offers an intellectual biography of the 18th-century Vaiṣṇava Vedāntin, Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa, connecting his travels through different parts of India with demonstrable influences on his thought and writing from a number of distinct intellectual traditions. In particular, the paper challenges the one-sided scholarly portrayal of the influence of Madhva's thought on Baladeva.
While the basic textbook consensus on Hindu literature relegates the Purāṇas to a lower order of ... more While the basic textbook consensus on Hindu literature relegates the Purāṇas to a lower order of Hindu scripture called smṛti, this paper demonstrates that some Hindu thinkers such as Jīva Gosvāmin (16th century) and Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa (18th century) argued that the Purāṇas are to be included within the higher category of śruti, on par with the four Vedas. The paper examines statements from Jīva Gosvāmin's Tattvasandarbha and Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa's Siddhāntadarpaṇa, providing a translation of the second chapter of the latter and the Sanskrit commentary thereupon.
This paper examines the commentary of Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa on Brahmasūtras 3.1.1-3, set against ... more This paper examines the commentary of Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa on Brahmasūtras 3.1.1-3, set against the background of the earlier commentarial traditon. The paper considers why and on what grounds Vedāntins made a point to differentiate their traditions from Yoga traditions.
A summary of the interpretive approach of and influences upon Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa's (18th centu... more A summary of the interpretive approach of and influences upon Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa's (18th century) commentary on the Bhagavadgītā, titled Gītābhūṣaṇa. The paper includes a translation of the verses which open and close each chapter of the commentary.
Dissertation by David Buchta
Pedagogical poetry: Didactics and devotion in Rupa Gosvamin's "Stavamala
Rūpa Gosvāmin (late 15th century–1564) was a foremost founding intellectual of the Gaudīya Vaisna... more Rūpa Gosvāmin (late 15th century–1564) was a foremost founding intellectual of the Gaudīya Vaisnava tradition. Complementing scholarship on his role in developing an aesthetic theology of bhakti-rasa, this dissertation examines Rūpa\u27s praise poems (stotra) collected in the Stavamālā, asking how they contributed to Rūpa\u27s role as a leader of a newly developing religious community. Thus, it helps to paint a richer portrait of Rūpa Gosvāmin and the early history of the Gaudīya Vaisnava community and to highlight the communicative importance of the stotra genre and the continued vitality of Sanskrit composition in the vernacular millennium. The approach taken here recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of Sanskrit learning. Rūpa\u27s deceptively simply stotras are examined against the background of a wide variety of intellectual traditions, including the Bengali hagiographical tradition, Vedānta theology, Purānic mythology, and Sanskrit prosody, poetics, and aesthetic theory. After an introductory chapter providing background on Rūpa Gosvāmin and the stotra genre, the body of this dissertation (Chapters Two through Four) is conceived in three main divisions, following a typology emic to the Gaudīya Vaisnava tradition, which divides discourse into three major areas: sambandha (ontological relationship between God and the self, i.e. theology), prayojana (the nature of the liberation, i.e. participation in Krsna\u27s eternal play), and abhidheya (the enjoined practice of devotion). Chapter Two considers stotras wherein Rūpa addresses the divinity of the saint Caitanya and of Krsna\u27s Name, two of the most controversial theological doctrines of his tradition. Chapter Three examines a set of stotras wherein Rūpa provides an intra-lingual translation of the narratives of Krsna\u27s play from the canonical Bhāgavata Purāna, making these narratives accessible to a broader audience. Chapter Four highlights Rūpa\u27s composition of stotras as a model for how to offer prayer, including his important role in the development of the virudāvalī genre. The stotra genre is shown to have developed as an extremely versatile means of communication, representing not merely a vehicle for personal expression of devotion, but a critical tool for the development of religious communities in medieval South Asia
Uploads
Papers by David Buchta
Dissertation by David Buchta