experiment: implicit-derivation-rep example of type reps failing inference - #6054
Draft
crusso wants to merge 9 commits into
Draft
experiment: implicit-derivation-rep example of type reps failing inference#6054crusso wants to merge 9 commits into
crusso wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
Allow the compiler to derive implicit arguments from functions that themselves have implicit parameters (e.g. `compare` for `[Nat]` from `Array.compare<Nat>` + `Nat.compare`). Works transitively and is depth-limited via `--implicit-derivation-depth`. Structural derivation (`__record`/`__tuple` combiners) will follow in a separate PR. Made-with: Cursor
Contributor
Contributor
|
Answered here #5966 (comment) |
Contributor
|
This draft pull request has had no activity for 60 days and has been marked as stale. It will not be closed automatically. Please close it if you can. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of reviewing #5966.
I thought this example (inferring a derived dictionary of functions( would work, but perhaps it's expected not to.
I guess we only apply inference if the hole has a function type - it can't be a record of methods. But is that restriction necessary?
I updated the review with some comments/questions