Spark name overflow fix - #1851
Conversation
|
User peter@shugalev.com does not have a PR Review subscription. Go to Team management and add this email to the PR Review subscription. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis PR adds integer overflow protection to sparkname validity validation. Two validation functions now explicitly check that ChangesSparkname Validity Overflow Protection
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR intention
Fixed a bug that may cause the spark name validity overflow over INT_MAX in some cases
Code changes brief
Additional checks to test if the added number of blocks is within the bounds