Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Nov 1, 2020
Drawing on Kane's argument-approach to validity and Toulmin's later work on cosmopolitanism and d... more Drawing on Kane's argument-approach to validity and Toulmin's later work on cosmopolitanism and diversity, this paper asks whose validity arguments and evidence are being presented in International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs), where and when. With a case study of the OECD's PISA for Development, we demonstrate that validity arguments are assembled, negotiated and transformed by the network of actors who come together in ILSAs. We claim that the challenge of ILSAs is not to establish a single authoritative argument through the displacement of plural interpretations and uses. We argue that one of the tasks of an argument-based approach to validity is to create a democratic space in which legitimately diverse arguments and intentions can be recognised, considered, assembled and displayed. We therefore suggest that 1) this socio-material practice of assembling validity should be integrated into validity theory and practice, and 2) the task of assembling validity should be informed by democratic principles of diversity and inclusion.
Uploads
Papers by Bruno Zumbo