Lisa Reisman
United States
11K followers
500+ connections
View mutual connections with Lisa
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Lisa
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
About
Lisa Reisman has over 25 years of experience in the metals industry and currently serves…
Articles by Lisa
-
2017 Metals Outlook
2017 Metals Outlook
We’ve just made the 2017 Metals Outlook available on MetalMiner and I wanted to share it with you. You can get your…
25
Activity
11K followers
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisThe critical-minerals conversation is no longer just about access. It is now about price differentials. And those differentials are growing. Using data from MetalMiner Market Signal and MetalMiner IndX, we are seeing some critical mineral markets where Western buyers are paying dramatically more than China for comparable material. The biggest current premiums are showing up in: 1️⃣ Yttrium oxide 2️⃣ Gadolinium 3️⃣ Terbium oxide 4️⃣ Gallium 5️⃣ Tungsten APT We also see the most pressure from widening spreads in: 1️⃣ Yttrium oxide 2️⃣ Gadolinium 3️⃣ Tungsten APT 4️⃣ Cobalt 5️⃣ Lithium carbonate That should get the attention of every manufacturer, procurement leader, investor, and policymaker focused on supply-chain resilience. Because when the West pays structurally more than China, that is not just a pricing story. It is a signal of: - tighter non-China availability, - higher replacement costs, - rising geopolitical friction, and increasing pressure on allied supply chains. At the same time, the picture is not one-directional. We also found several markets where Western prices are currently at a discount to China, including: 1️⃣ Fluorspar / Fluorite 2️⃣ Lithium carbonate 3️⃣ Molybdenum oxide 4️⃣ Niobium 5️⃣ Platinum 6️⃣ Tantalum 7️⃣ Tellurium Those discounts matter too. They may point to temporary sourcing opportunity, regional imbalance, or a market where the spread story has not yet broken the same way. The larger point is this: If you are still watching only the benchmark price, you are missing the real signal. The next phase of critical-minerals risk will be defined by regional dislocation, not just outright direction. Buyers need to know: 👇 1️⃣ where Western premiums are already extreme, 2️⃣ which spreads are widening fastest, 3️⃣ and where relative value may still exist. At MetalMiner, we believe this is exactly the kind of intelligence procurement teams need now: not just “where is the price going,” but where is the market breaking apart regionally? 👉 If your organization depends on critical minerals, now is the time to: map your regional price exposure, stress-test your non-China sourcing assumptions, and build spread monitoring into your procurement strategy!!! The companies that act on these signals early will be in a much stronger position than the ones that wait for the disruption to show up in contracts and margins. 💪 #CriticalMinerals #SupplyChain #Procurement #Manufacturing #CommodityMarkets #RareEarths #BatteryMaterials #MarketIntelligence #Pricing #MetalMiner
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisChamath Palihapitiya has the right lens on assessing how to think about the importance of critical minerals by assigning GDP impacts as well as security/national defense impacts. If we looked at the world through that first lens, GDP impact alone, we'd come to some different answers. I'm sure many of you remember some classic case studies from business school. Remember Boeing's 787 delays due in part to a critical fastener shortage? An item worth about 3% of the total value of the plane but caused a 90-day delivery day originally and then added to several more delays. What is the cost of not delivering a plane on time??? In 2018, Trump's sanctions on aluminum producer Rusal shut down that mills' output to the U.S. causing companies to scramble if they didn't have alternative suppliers. More production shut-downs. Or more recently, Ford faced a rare earth minerals shortage that hurt production and forced the temporary shutdown of one of its plants for a week in mid-2025 because the company couldn't get high-power magnets. Anyone want to guess what shutting down an automotive line costs? (Hint: Likely more than $10m/week - probably $15-20m) I'd argue the main reason companies have not been screaming as loudly as they are now for some of these critical minerals is because they look at their spend cube and see that their ______ metal is quite small from both a volume and a dollar perspective. But what they often forget is that those minerals represent the fastener in the Boeing case. They might be small and cheap but they are very strategic and critical to GDP! #criticalminerals #rareearths #procurementLisa Reisman shared thisThere are two ways the US can look at critical minerals that we’re currently not doing: 1. Economic exposure: Which minerals create the largest GDP shock if supply is disrupted? 2. Defense exposure: Which minerals gate national security systems with few qualified substitutes? Currently, we’re looking at: - What’s essential to economic well‐being - What faces a significant risk of supply disruption - What lacks scalable substitutes without major performance or cost penalties And from it, we’ve identified 60 critical mineral commodities. The ranking that USGS came up with is useful, but it is not a complete national-security ranking. This model can underweight minerals that matter less to GDP overall but are critical to weapons systems, munitions, sensors, semiconductors, magnets, or surge production during times of elevated conflict. The USGS’s economic-exposure lens ranked these as the highest minerals on their radar: samarium, rhodium, lutetium, terbium, and dysprosium. But if you put on a defense lens, it shifts the watchlist to antimony, tungsten, gallium, germanium, and rare-earth magnet minerals. These cut across munitions, sensors, semiconductors, motors, magnets, and structural alloys. Certainly, the U.S. critical-mineral risk is hard to reduce to a single top-five ranking. But the better framework is to see which minerals create the largest GDP shock, which create defense bottlenecks, and which sit at the intersection of both. My team did a study on critical minerals. If you want to learn more about them, read it on my Substack: (https://lnkd.in/gmATYiB4)
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisHave you ever looked back at a drastic metal market price shift and thought: "We should have seen that coming" Examples include: • Pandemic • Tariff announcements • Geopolitical supply disruptions e.g. export bans, export license restrictions Most organizations don't actually miss these events because they weren't paying attention. They struggle because their plans assumed only a limited number of outcomes. The uncomfortable truth is that preparedness rarely feels urgent until after it's needed. Procurement, finance and supply chain leaders aren't expected to predict every twist in the market. Rather, they're expected to ask better questions: • Where are we most exposed? • What assumptions are built into our plans? • What happens if we're wrong? 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘆, 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆. Tomorrow's discussion at 11 AM EST, 𝘔𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘝𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘐𝘴𝘯'𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘙𝘪𝘴𝘬, 𝘉𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘜𝘯𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘐𝘴, is designed to help teams pressure-test those assumptions. There are still seats available. Opt in before they are gone: https://lnkd.in/dXBVe8xi #MetalPrices #SupplyChainManagement #metalvolatilityVideo Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen SharingVideo Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisAnother insightful (though slightly self serving but nonetheless - hee hee) article on the future of work in an A2A model...written by none other than the procurement guru Jason Busch (who also doubles as my husband, in the name of full disclosure). What he didn't mention is what keeps us up at night - how to convert your entire subscription business model to a consumption model. Luckily we have our own internal agent, Sage who is helping us. But the challenges come down to a number of issues that many companies who want to make their data available through a MCP need to consider: 👇 1️⃣ What are the use cases for our data? 2️⃣ What is the call frequency? 3️⃣ How do we handle "value" across the multiple layers of data we provide (e.g. price data, historical price data, forecasts, signaling?) 4️⃣ What is the 'MVP sandbox set of data' that you are willing to "give away" for people to "taste" your solution? 5️⃣ How do you price between enterprise use vs. full distribution use? 6️⃣ How do you ensure you don't cannibalize existing revenue? 7️⃣ Who/how do you find the "right" distribution channels to enter into new markets? Never a dull moment! Comment if you have some thoughts. We'd love to hear them. #MetalA2A #criticalminerals #procurement #supplychain #financeSoftware Is Negotiating With Other Software. You're Not Invited.Software Is Negotiating With Other Software. You're Not Invited.Jason Busch
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisSometimes the biggest budget risk isn't what's happening in the market. It's what's happening inside your organization. Procurement may focus on supplier pricing and purchasing decisions, while finance may focus on budgets and margin exposure. Meanwhile supply chain cares about bottleneck and/or hard-to-get materials. Each are trying to solve the same problem, but are they working based on the same assumptions? • When uncertainty increases, alignment matters. • Have all teams discussed what happens if conditions change? • Do they agree on what action comes next? No one gets every forecast right, but organizations can improve how they prepare and respond. Join AEGIS Hedging and MetalMiner to continue this discussion on June 24 during: Metal Price Volatility Isn't the Risk, Being Unprepared Is. Save your seat: https://lnkd.in/dXBVe8xi #MetalPrices #SupplyChainManagement #metalvolatilityVideo Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen SharingVideo Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisFor anybody looking to better understand the economics of critical minerals, Ashley Zumwalt-Forbes wrote a must-read analysis of each node in a critical mineral supply chain. It's a great supplement to Chamath Palihapitiya Deep Dive "Learn with Me" on Critical Minerals. I'll post a link to that in the comments. #CriticalMinerals #coppereconomics #copperforecasts #copperpricesNobody Builds a Copper Smelter for FreeNobody Builds a Copper Smelter for FreeAshley Zumwalt-Forbes
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisProcurement teams don't struggle because prices move. They struggle because they don't know how to respond when they do. Many teams entered 2026 feeling confident. Budgets were approved. Forecasts were built. Sourcing strategies were in place. Then their assumptions about market trends didn’t play out as they had anticipated, especially in the wake of the war in Iran. The instinct is often to focus on predicting what happens next. But perfect prediction was never the goal. Preparedness is. How exposed are we? What happens if our assumptions are wrong? What decisions can we make before we're forced to react? Volatility is inevitable, but being unprepared is optional. That's one of the conversations we'll continue during Metal Price Volatility Isn't the Risk, Being Unprepared Is on June 24. Claim your seat: https://lnkd.in/dXBVe8xi #MetalPrices #SupplyChainManagement #metalvolatility
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisEveryone's pricing the oil. Almost no one is pricing the metal. I recently listened to Pippa Malmgren on a recent MacroVoices episode lay out an extremely contrarian read on the Iran conflict — that this isn't a state negotiation at all, but a superpower "Rubik's Cube" where the Strait of Hormuz stays shut because Washington is a net beneficiary, and the real endgame is a hard pivot from oil and gas to SMRs and modular nuclear. You don't have to buy the whole thesis. As a buyer or a CFO for that matter, you just have to run the math on what happens if even part of this thesis comes to life. Here's what I see: Near term, this is an aluminum story — and it's an availability story. The Gulf is only ~8% of global primary aluminum, but it's a wildly outsized share of the world's seaborne metal. Every ton out of the UAE, Bahrain, Qatar and Oman — and the alumina feedstock going back in — moves through Hormuz. With EGA, Alba and Qatalum running impaired, Wood Mackenzie puts 3–3.5 million tons at risk this year. LME is pushing $4,000, the Midwest premium has posted record highs. Here's the part the oil desk doesn't appreciate: you can re-open a Strait in a weekend. You cannot re-open an aluminum pot line in a weekend. That's why I'd treat this as a tonnage-allocation problem. Longer term, we might see a demand shock hiding inside a supply shock. If the build-out of small modular reactors accelerates the way the optimists claim, the bottleneck doesn't disappear — it relocates. Western HALEU (high assay low enriched uranium) is a fraction of what that future needs. Nuclear-grade zirconium and hafnium are thinly traded and concentrated in a handful of facilities. Add beryllium, nuclear graphite, and the grid build pulling copper, silver and — yes — more aluminum. The same metal that's short today is short again on the other side of the transition. So what do you actually do with a counterfactual? You don't trade it. You hedge it. 1️⃣ Qualify non-Gulf aluminum sources now, while you're choosing, not when you're rationed. (you may already be rationed) 2️⃣ Rebuild your should-cost with premiums embedded, not bolted on. 3️⃣ Lengthen coverage on contracted volume; spot buyers get deprioritized first when mills allocate. 4️⃣ Map your BOM two tiers deep for nuclear and critical-mineral exposure before it's a headline. 5️⃣ And stop forecasting off ingot price alone. Ingot is the part of this story that's lying to you. The scenario doesn't have to be true to cost you money. It only has to be possible. What's your read — are you pricing the strait, or pricing the supply chain behind it? #procurement #supplychain #aluminum #metals #criticalminerals #nuclear #commodities #MetalMiner https://lnkd.in/dcHWmh72MacroVoices #534 Dr. Pippa Malmgren: Superpower War or Superpower Hug?MacroVoices #534 Dr. Pippa Malmgren: Superpower War or Superpower Hug?
-
Lisa Reisman shared thisFord’s $1 billion raw-material cost hit (see below) should force a harder conversation in manufacturing: How much of commodity inflation is truly “unavoidable” — and how much is just unmanaged exposure? Because this was not simply a story of “aluminum got expensive.” It was a story of buyers still treating aluminum like a single number, when in reality North American exposure is at least two markets: 1️⃣ LME aluminum 2️⃣ U.S. Midwest premium And over the last year, those two moved very differently. According to MetalMiner data: 👆 LME aluminum rose about 47% 👆 U.S. Midwest premium rose about 189% That second number is the one that should make procurement teams uncomfortable. Too many organizations still monitor the exchange and assume they understand their aluminum risk. They don’t. Not if the premium side is what’s actually blowing out the budget. That is why the real procurement failure in markets like this is usually not “we didn’t predict the spike.” It is: 1️⃣ we didn’t separate the exposure correctly 2️⃣ we didn’t cover the right piece first 3️⃣ we waited too long and then we called the result “market conditions” 🛑 The market should stop normalizing that. Using MetalMiner’s historical aluminum buying-strategy track record as a benchmark for disciplined timing, buyers could have seen roughly: 2.7% cumulative savings versus market on LME aluminum 5.0% cumulative savings versus market on the U.S. Midwest premium Important caveat: this is historical track record, not a future guarantee. What does this mean? On $1 billion of exposed spend: 2.7% = $27 million 5.0% = $50 million That is not noise. That is not “rounding.” That is the difference between explaining away inflation and actually managing it. And frankly, the bigger opportunity may not even be the percentage savings alone. It is avoiding the procurement pattern that destroys budgets: - leaving premium exposure open - getting forced into the market - locking volume after the move and discovering too late that “hedged aluminum” was never really hedged at all This is the uncomfortable truth for the market: Most companies do not have a commodity problem. They have a buying-process problem. Better market intelligence does not eliminate inflation. It does something more important: it shows which part of the cost stack is dangerous it signals when risk is changing it helps buyers layer decisions instead of reacting and it turns “surprise” into strategy If you are a manufacturer buying aluminum, the lesson is simple: manage the exchange manage the premium do not confuse one with the other and stop calling avoidable exposure “bad luck” Because in a market like this, “the market moved against us” is sometimes just another way of saying: we were looking at the wrong benchmark. #aluminum #procurement #strategicsourcing #hedgealuminum https://lnkd.in/g-8rBgig
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked thisLisa and I spent the last two weeks visiting our nation’s parks. At times, we stood only inches away from thousand-foot drops. It was one of the best trips I have taken in a long time. New to these parks, some trails were smooth and easy to follow. Others were narrow, rocky, and close enough to the edge to make you watch every step. The trails reminded me of building a business. Sometimes the path is clear. There are signs, maps, and people showing the way. Other times, you have to slow down, study the ground, make a choice, and see where it leads. When I started slinging sandwiches in the mid-1990s, everyone talked about “location, location, location.” We challenged that idea. We delivered quickly, and instead of waiting for customers to find us, we went to them and put sandwiches in their mouths. I had great mentors, but no perfect guide. I had to experiment, fail, learn, and start again. Then the internet changed how we found information. Suddenly, there were endless articles, videos, experts, coaches, and opinions. Some of it was helpful. A lot of it was noise. The hard part was no longer finding information. The hard part was deciding which information mattered. Now AI is changing things again. AI can give us more summaries of information than ever before. But information alone does not move us forward. We still have to decide what matters and which step to take next. Sometimes, what we need is not another answer. We need something that helps us take the next step. As I walked those mountain trails, I realized that is exactly what a handrail does. Whenever one was available, I used it. Not because I was weak. Not because I could not walk without it. I used it because it helped me move faster with more confidence. There is an important difference between a handrail and a crutch. A crutch is something we depend on so much that we struggle to function without it. A handrail supports us while we are still moving under our own power. Mentors, peers, books, checklists, plans, and trusted guides can all be handrails. The problem is not using tools. The problem is allowing tools to replace our effort, judgment, and responsibility. A good tool does not do all the walking for you. It helps you see the next step. It helps you avoid a needless fall. It helps you move forward with confidence. There is no prize for refusing to use a handrail just to prove that you can walk alone. Use the tools that help. Learn from people who have already walked the trail. Avoid mistakes that do not need to be repeated. Just make sure you are still the one doing the walking. Use the handrail. Do not turn it into a crutch. And every once in a while, put down the screen, touch some grass, and remember why the journey matters. ps. the picture is straight off an Android phone, no filter necessary
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked thisZimbabwe's lithium producers asked to push their export ban deadline to mid-2027. The government said no, and I think that single decision declares who owns Zimbabwe's mining industry for decades. For context, Zimbabwe banned raw lithium ore exports in December 2022, and processing DID get built by the companies already holding the ground, with no runway for anyone else to establish a presence. Huayou commissioned a $300M concentrator at Arcadia in 2023, built in nine months, exporting by that April. When an additional ban was placed on concentrate exports this February, Huayou answered again, starting production at a new $400 million lithium sulfate plant. Sinomine has flagged ~$500 million, phased, at Bikita. Two bans, two plants, one company... Sadly, this specific beneficiation policy moves value up into exactly the assets Zimbabweans do not own (Arcadia is 100% Huayou. Bikita is 74% Sinomine.) Indonesia ran the same experiment at scale, with similar results: full nickel ore ban in January 2020, ~$30 billion of Chinese downstream investment, smelters from ~3 in 2014 to ~49, export revenue from ~$11.9 billion to over $38 billion by 2024. Indonesia now produces ~60% of the world's nickel. On direct ownership, Chinese shareholders hold ~61% of that refining capacity against ~13% for Indonesian shareholders. Trace beneficial ownership and the Chinese share is >75%. Where no builder is already standing there, it results in extreme value destruction: stranded ore, producers eating the losses, and countries losing jobs, tax revenue, and credibility as investment jurisdictions. Examples: Tanzania gold and copper concentrate ban instated in 2017 and scrapped in 2020, no smelter built; Zimbabwe's first chrome ban (2011 to 2015) went the same way, output down ~65% with Zim Alloys and Zimasco shuttered; Indonesia's 2014 bauxite ban was rescinded in 2017 for the same reason. I absolutely understand the desire for a country to want additional beneficiation done in their country: more investment, more jobs, more tax revenue, more value. However, this cannot be done overnight, particularly where you want to enable local participation. As a framework, I like the phased approach Tony Carroll and Jef Caers set out in last week's Atlantic Council Critical Minerals Task Force report: local-processing requirements raised proportionally over five-year periods. Five years tracks the 3 to 5 a plant actually takes to commission. That gives capital not already in-country time to show up, and gives local ownership a chance to build alongside it rather than behind it. https://lnkd.in/g6EaYv_6 #CriticalMinerals #MiningFinance #Africa #Processing #SupplyChain
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked thisThe U.S. Department of State dropped a $500M announcement for critical minerals in Africa last week and I don't think its getting the fanfare it deserves. The U.S.-Africa Strategic Investment Program will be ~10 awards of $5M to $50M each, structured as grants or cooperative agreements with no cost-share requirement. The initial application is a two-page statement of interest rather than a full proposal, so the cost of raising your hand is close to nothing. The windows roll quarterly, with the first closing August 21, the next November 30, and an optional notice of intent due September 11. As we all know, the bottleneck in critical minerals is not the ore in the ground, it is the enabling environment around it: processing capability, transparent pricing, bankable offtake, and regulatory and logistics groundwork that Western capital wants in place before it will underwrite a project. I believe this program goes straight at that gap with non-dilutive money, aimed at pulling private capital toward financial close instead of crowding it out. If you are building or financing critical minerals in Africa, I think this is worth a look. https://lnkd.in/gdHRpSiV #CriticalMinerals #Africa #SupplyChains #ProjectFinance #LobitoCorridor
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked thisOMNISIGHT | Ascend Elements raised over $1 billion. Then filed for Chapter 11 — after losing a patent fight to a mid-sized German recycler, not a Chinese state champion. That's the clearest proof yet that Western "bankability" frameworks are solving the wrong problem. Capital doesn't buy freedom to operate — and no amount of DoD price floors or #EU grants changes that if the underlying process IP sits behind someone else's patent wall. I wrote up the full picture — the recycling loophole closing under #MOFCOM No. 70, the Chinese equity stakes quietly capturing "independent" European recyclers, and a reframe from Moerenhout/Nadrowski on why matching China's spending won't fix this — in the article below. Read the full breakdown here- 👇 👇 👇 #CriticalMinerals #SupplyChainSecurity #Bankability #RareEarths #BatteryRecycling #IRF #OMNISIGHTThe Bankability Blind Spot: Why Western Critical-Minerals Capital Isn't Buying Supply Chain SecurityThe Bankability Blind Spot: Why Western Critical-Minerals Capital Isn't Buying Supply Chain SecuritySerguei Fenko
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked this📢 It's official!! I am very excited to announce that I have joined Aperam Stainless & Solutions USA as Commercial Manager, National Accounts, with a focus on customers across the Northeastern and Southeastern US. Aperam is a value-added extension of a Top 10 global stainless-steel producer, and I get to bring that strength directly to the service centers and manufacturers who depend on stainless to build. My focus is simple: build real partnerships, grow accounts, and make sure every commitment we make is one we deliver. Reliable supply, in-house processing, and the metallurgical know-how to solve the hard problems, backed by a company with the financial strength to stand behind it. If you work in the stainless world, I would love to be your call when you need material sourced, processed, or problem solved. Grateful for this opportunity and ready to get to work. Let's connect! 📧 julie.treska@aperam.com #StainlessSteel #Aperam #Sales #BusinessDevelopment #Metals
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked thisThe behavior of the head of the Smithsonian's Museum of American History at yesterday's hearing was appalling. She made clear she'll keep smearing the US as racist and genocidal, and denying biological sex. If she and Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch don't resign, Congress must defund it. https://lnkd.in/g6CxH7_b
-
Lisa Reisman liked thisLisa Reisman liked thisFour years ago, we asked a question: How do we help more young people, especially girls, experience the life-changing benefits of rowing? That question became Camp Lucy. What started as a three-day pilot in 2021 has grown into a regional program serving young women across three boathouses. Today, Camp Lucy helps girls, many of whom have been historically underrepresented in rowing, discover confidence, leadership, and community on and off the water. The impact has been incredible. Camp Lucy now fills months in advance, former campers are returning as counselors, and young women who once arrived unsure of themselves are helping lead the next generation. Now we’re inviting women to be part of this mission in a new way. Introducing Camp Lucille, a women’s rowing and wellness retreat at beautiful Suttle Lake in Central Oregon, September 16–18, 2026. Camp Lucille is three days designed for women who love rowing, want to reconnect with the water, or simply want time to recharge with an inspiring community. Participants will experience coached rowing, wellness activities, meaningful conversations, and the beauty of the Pacific Northwest, all while directly supporting opportunities for young women through Camp Lucy. Only 22 spots are available. Join us for the next chapter of this story. Register here: https://lnkd.in/ge-e4GUP #Rowing #WomensSports #GirlsInSports #Leadership #Community
Recommendations received
2 people have recommended Lisa
Join now to viewView Lisa’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact Lisa directly
Other similar profiles
Explore more posts
-
ScrapMonster | Real-Time Scrap Metal Prices, Recycling News, Scrap Yard Finder & Marketplace
2K followers
Here’s the weekly scrap metal scoreboard. Aluminum led gains while copper and brass declined during the Feb 27 – Mar 5 reporting window tracked by the ScrapMonster Price Index. Full report: https://lnkd.in/en2_u9Y4
1 Comment -
Sandeep Daga
Metal Intelligence Centre… • 5K followers
How will metals react to the US tariff ruling? The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling has challenged earlier tariff measures, yet fresh duties and potential new investigations could still sway metals markets. While the immediate impact looks limited, shifting trade policies and geopolitical risks may drive price moves ahead. Click the link here to read the FULL report: https://lnkd.in/geUZRyBK Visit us at mic.regsus.com for more information like this.
12
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content