PGGM’s Post

View organization page for PGGM

29,396 followers

Do not weaken Europe’s carbon market just when it starts to matter most: PGGM’s Lars Dijkstra and Andres van der Linden set out four priorities that a modernised carbon market must meet. 

  • No alternative text description for this image

Carbon rights aren’t an asset class. They mark an 𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘆. Once you make these boundaries tradable (the right to emit becomes a financial instrument), you invite arbitrage, not progress. At the same time, we see that broad value‑weighted indices systematically overweight carbon‑intensive sectors, creating a structural carbon bias of 70–90%. Together, ETS trading and index design can reinforce carbon‑intensive exposures, exposing long‑term investors like pension funds to transition risks that contradict their sustainability objectives. It’s a clear example of how market design (not investor intent) can hard‑wire carbon‑intensive distortions into portfolios. Source: Netspar (2024) : Carbon Bias in Index Investing https://www.netspar.nl/wp-content/uploads/Netspar-Design-Paper-218-WEB.pdf N.B. Adjusted post, thanks to Sean Mohen's comment

  • No alternative text description for this image
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories