Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Selective DNA amplification from complex genomes using universal double-sided adapters

2004, Nucleic Acids Research

https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GNH019

Abstract

There is a rapidly developing need for new technologies to amplify millions of different targets from genomic DNA for high throughput genotyping and population gene-sequencing from diverse species. Here we describe a novel approach for the speci®c selection and ampli®cation of genomic DNA fragments of interest that eliminates the need for costly and time consuming synthesis and testing of potentially millions of amplicon-speci®c primers. This technique relies upon Type IIs restriction enzyme digestion of genomic DNA and ligation of the fragments to double-sided adapters to form closed-circular DNA molecules. The novel use of double-sided adapters, assembled through the combinatorial use of two small universal sets of oligonucleotide building blocks, provides greater selection capacity by utilizing both sides of the adapter in a sequence-speci®c ligation event. As demonstrated, formation of circular structures results in protection of the desired molecules from nuclease treatment and enables a level of selectivity high enough to isolate single, or multiple, pre-de®ned fragments from the human genome when digested at over ®ve million sites. Priming sites incorporated into the adapter allows the utilization of a common pair of primers for the ampli®cation of any adapter-captured DNA fragment of interest.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The methodology enables selective amplification of genomic DNA fragments using universal double-sided adapters.
  2. Achieves a theoretical 10^9-fold enrichment from human genomic DNA digested to 100 million fragments.
  3. Utilizes Type IIs restriction enzymes to create 4-base, 5' overhangs for fragment selection.
  4. Demonstrates successful amplification of seven specific amplicons from human and E. coli genomes.
  5. Offers cost-effective high-throughput genotyping without the need for multiple specific primers.
Published online January 29, 28, 2004 Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 e21 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnh019 Selective DNA ampli®cation from complex genomes using universal double-sided adapters Matthew J. Callow, Snezana Drmanac and Radoje Drmanac* Callida Genomics Inc., 675 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94085, USA Received October 16, 2003; Revised and Accepted December 11, 2003 ABSTRACT targeted genomic DNA fragments generated by restriction endonucleases that cut outside of their recognition sequence There is a rapidly developing need for new technolo- (Type IIs) (1). Sequence speci®city is achieved by assembling gies to amplify millions of different targets from two oligonucleotides into double-sided adapters for a ligation genomic DNA for high throughput genotyping and mediated selection process. population gene-sequencing from diverse species. The use of Type IIs restriction endonucleases to fragment Here we describe a novel approach for the speci®c DNA, and the capture of those fragments by ligation to Downloaded from http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 16, 2015 selection and ampli®cation of genomic DNA frag- adapters, has been described in the past (2,3). These studies ments of interest that eliminates the need for costly also relied upon the incorporation of primer binding sites in and time consuming synthesis and testing of poten- the adapters to amplify the captured sequences over other tially millions of amplicon-speci®c primers. This sequences by standard PCR methodologies. Type II enzymes technique relies upon Type IIs restriction enzyme have also been applied to this goal (4); however, we are digestion of genomic DNA and ligation of unaware of any studies that have demonstrated the isolation of the fragments to double-sided adapters to form speci®c, pre-de®ned fragments from the human genome when digested into millions of fragments. Sibson et al. (5) also closed-circular DNA molecules. The novel use of recently described an approach for sorting or indexing of Type double-sided adapters, assembled through the IIs restriction fragments using successive rounds of digestion combinatorial use of two small universal sets of and ligation to adapters with two overhanging bases. This was oligonucleotide building blocks, provides greater achieved by incorporating Type IIs restriction sites into the selection capacity by utilizing both sides of the adapter to cut into the adjacent genomic sequence. In all, six adapter in a sequence-speci®c ligation event. As bases were used to achieve a maximal possible enrichment of demonstrated, formation of circular structures 1920-fold. The incorporation of Type IIs recognition results in protection of the desired molecules from sequences into adapters for cutting into adjacent sequences nuclease treatment and enables a level of selectivity (6) has also been applied in the technique of Serial Analysis of high enough to isolate single, or multiple, pre- Gene Expression (SAGE) (7). de®ned fragments from the human genome when There are several methodologies available that can reduce digested at over ®ve million sites. Priming sites in- the complexity of genomes including AFLP (8), Alu-PCR corporated into the adapter allows the utilization of (9,10), DOP-PCR (11±13) and PCR amplicon size selection (14,15). These techniques are limited however, because they a common pair of primers for the ampli®cation of typically select from only a portion of the genome or they co- any adapter-captured DNA fragment of interest. isolate many undesired fragments. In the methodology we present here, the entire genome is accessible and single, speci®c DNA fragments can be isolated rapidly. Further INTRODUCTION rounds of isolation with alternative techniques may enable the The quest to isolate speci®c DNA fragments from complex selection of single fragments from complex genomes but this genomes has centered around two major approaches. In the adds considerably to the complexity of the methods and ®rst, genomic fragments are captured during library construc- multiplexing cannot typically be performed without the tion with subsequent clone isolation using sequence-speci®c associated isolation of many unwanted fragments. probes. In the second, sequence-speci®c oligonucleotide Alternatively, the user is limited in some way to utilize only primers are used in a DNA ampli®cation reaction. Existing sequences that fall within regions of the genome that are approaches for selective ampli®cation from genomic DNA speci®cally targeted by the technology such as speci®c have, therefore, often relied upon the custom generation of restriction enzyme fragments or size ranges. DOP-PCR and reagents (primers and/or probes) speci®c for each polymorph- Alu-PCR can amplify random regions of the genome and ism, which can be costly and time consuming. In this study therefore reduce sequence complexity but they have yet to be we describe an approach for isolating single, or multiple, able to isolate speci®c sequences from complex genomes *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 408 746 4525; Fax: +1 408 746 4596; Email: [email protected] Present address: Matthew J. Callow, Perlegen Sciences, 2021 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 2 ã Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved e21 Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 PAGE 2 OF 6 without unwanted fragments and a universal oligonucleotide adapter core with 14 and 17 base 3¢ overhangs. Two shorter, set. The methodology we report here is a rapid alternative to variable oligonucleotides were then ligated to the core with T4 these methods for the reduction of genome complexity and for DNA ligase (20 U/ml) (NEB) at 25°C to produce the 4-base 5¢ the single or multiplexed isolation of speci®c DNA fragments. overhangs. The ®nal concentration of variable oligonucle- Our method, termed Universal Selective Ampli®cation, otides to core adapter was 8 mM each to 4 mM, respectively. utilizes double-sided adapters to induce selective closed-circle The ®nal adapter was then phosphorylated and puri®ed using a formation with target DNA, and exonuclease treatment to Qiaquick spin protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The DNA was enhance selection and speci®city, especially critical for collected in 40 ml of 10 mM Tris/0.1 mM EDTA pH 8 (TE). multiplex ampli®cation. Our approach for Universal Selective Ampli®cation is designed for the combinatorial Adapter formation test use of a relatively small and ®nite number of universal adapter-building oligonucleotides for speci®c fragment selec- Core adapter, adapter after ligation of overhang oligonucle- tion from millions of short genomic fragments. Furthermore, otides and adapter after ®nal phosphorylation was treated with by utilizing common PCR primers, this technique will be more 2.5 U of Lambda Exonuclease (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) in a amenable to applications requiring multiplex ampli®cation of reaction buffer of 67 mM glycine±KOH, pH 9.4, 2.5 mM DNA sequences. MgCl2 and 50 mg/ml BSA in 10 ml. The reaction was incubated There are two broad application areas for this methodology. at 37°C for 10 min and then at 75°C for 10 min. The ®rst area utilizes and allows for the selection of multiple Downloaded from http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 16, 2015 fragments that share a particular fragment overhang-type, such First-round selection as for sequence complexity reduction in which a speci®c Adapter (20 fmol) was ligated to 150 ng of BbvI-digested fragment is enriched. The second area utilizes and requires a genomic DNA in a volume of 10 ml for 30 min at 25°C in the higher level of selection for isolation of single, speci®c presence of 13 T4 DNA ligase buffer (NEB) and 200 U of T4 fragments or multiple speci®c fragments in a multiplexed DNA ligase (NEB). The enzyme was heat inactivated at 65°C selection process. Applications of the methodology include for 10 min. The ligation reaction was then treated with 1 U of detection and isolation of speci®c exons, genotyping of SNPs Bal31 nuclease (NEB) in the presence of 13 Bal31 nuclease in a low sequence-complexity sample, and isolation of speci®c buffer (NEB) for 30 min at 30°C and then heat inactivated at genes or regulatory elements. We present the successful 75°C for 10 min. The sample was diluted 10-fold with TE and ampli®cation of three Escherichia coli and four human 8 ml were digested with 2.5 U of NotI enzyme (NEB) in a 10 ml amplicons demonstrating the feasibility of the method. volume before 1 ml was used in a 30 ml PCR. PCR from Adapter A was carried out at 94°C for 3 min, denaturation at 94°C for 20 min, annealing at 66 to 62°C for ®ve cycles and MATERIALS AND METHODS 62°C for the following 35 cycles for 30 s. Extension was at Oligonucleotides 72°C for 30 s. Reaction conditions were 13 Thermopol buffer (NEB), 200 mM dNTP, 0.2 mM primers (5¢-TGAGACCAC- Oligonucleotides were purchased from Qiagen-Operon AGCCTAGACAGC and 5¢-CTGCAAGGCGATTAAGT- (Alameda, CA) and were HPLC puri®ed for lengths >40 TGG) and 0.6 U/100 ml Vent exo-DNA polymerase (NEB) bases and 2-step HPLC puri®ed for lengths >60 bases. All or 1.8 U/100 ml Taq (Qiagen) in 10 mM Tris±HCl pH 8.3, other oligonucleotides were supplied de-salted. In some cases 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.001% gelatin. If two rounds of oligonucleotides were ordered phosphorylated from the selection were to be performed the NotI digest was omitted manufacturer or were phosphorylated with T4 polynucleotide and the combined volume of the PCRs was 200 ml. kinase (PNK) [New England Biolabs (NEB), Beverly, MA] by incubating at 37°C for 30 min and then 65°C for 20 min. Second-round selection Reaction conditions were 10 U of PNK, 1 mM ATP, 13 PNK buffer (NEB) and 250 pmol of 5¢ termini in a 20 ml reaction. The ®rst round PCR (200 ml) was puri®ed using the Qiaquick protocol (Qiagen) and isolated in 40 ml of TE. Digestion of the Genomic DNA digestion adapter was performed in a 10 ml reaction with 8 ml of puri®ed Escherichia coli genomic DNA was sourced from the PCR, 13 NEB buffer 2 and 4 U of FokI enzyme (NEB). MG1655 strain supplied from the American Type Culture Digestion was for 60 min at 37°C followed by inactivation at Collection (Manassas, VA). DNA was isolated by lysis of 65°C for 20 min. The digest (8 ml) was then combined with bacterial cells in an SDS±proteinase K solution followed by 103 T4 DNA ligase buffer (1 ml) adapter B (20 fmol, 1 ml) and RNAse treatment and multiple phenol/chloroform extractions 200 U of T4 DNA ligase. After incubation for 30 min at 25°C before ethanol precipitation (16). Human genomic DNA was and inactivation at 65°C for 10 min the reaction was digested purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). The DNA (10 mg) with 1 U of Bal31 nuclease in 13 Bal buffer (NEB). The was digested with 8 U of the restriction enzyme BbvI (NEB) sample was diluted 10-fold with TE and 8 ml were digested for 3 h at 37°C before heat inactivation at 65°C for 20 min. with 2.5 U of NotI enzyme (NEB) in a 10 ml volume before 1 ml was used in a 30 ml PCR at 94°C for 3 min, 94°C for 20 s, Adapter preparation 58°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s over 35 cycles. Reaction Adapters were prepared either by annealing two complete conditions were 13 Thermopol buffer (NEB), 200 mM dNTP, single-stranded oligonucleotides to produce 4-base, 5¢ over- 0.2 mM adapter B primers (5¢-GACGGCTGAAATTGGTA- hangs at each end or by annealing two complementary AGG and 5¢-CGGAATCAAAGCAGGATAAGG) and oligonucleotides that, when double stranded, produce an 0.6 U/100 ml Vent exo-DNA polymerase (NEB). PAGE 3 OF 6 Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 e21 RESULTS Universal Selective Ampli®cation process We selected Type IIs restriction enzymes that produce 4-base, 5¢ overhangs of digested genomic DNA to fragment the genome into an estimated 32 768 (non-directional) variants de®ned by the sequence of the overhangs. A double-sided adapter preparation was used to capture speci®c fragments into closed-circular molecules that protect the fragments from subsequent exonuclease digestion (Fig. 1). For isolation of single fragments from complex mammalian genomes, a second round of selection was used by incorporating Type IIs recognition sites into the adapter that cut further into the genomic sequence of the captured fragment. The released fragment was re-captured with a new adapter and ampli®ed by PCR utilizing common primer binding sites in the adapter. This two-step process predicts a theoretical 109-fold enrich- ment of the desired fragment resulting in a speci®c, pre- Downloaded from http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 16, 2015 de®ned fragment being isolated from human genomic DNA digested to 100 million fragments (one cut every 30 bases). Adapter assembly Although adapters could be prepared from as few as two sets Figure 1. Schematic representation of Universal Selective Ampli®cation of 256 oligonucleotides that can form all possible 32 768 from the human genome. (1) Digestion of DNA with Type IIs restriction complementary adapters, for this study adapters were prepared enzyme and ligation to adapter. The desired fragment (red) has overhangs using a common phosphorylated core sequence with two complementary to the adapter. (2) Multiple structures are formed in a ligation reaction, but the desired fragment is captured into a closed circular different (one on each side) 14 to 17 base 3¢ overhangs. Two molecule. (3) Digestion of linear molecules and mismatch structures with shorter, variable, 5¢ overhang-generating oligonucleotides, exonuclease preserves and enriches the circular molecules for PCR each matching to one 14±17 base overhang were then ligated ampli®cation. (4) Digestion with a second Type IIs restriction enzyme to the core DNA and the ®nal product was phosphorylated. To (recognition sites in yellow) releases the genomic insert and presents new 4-base overhangs. (5) A new adapter complementary to the new overhangs con®rm that adapter assembly was occurring ef®ciently at is introduced and the process (ligation, exonuclease digestion and PCR) is each stage, we developed a nuclease-sensitivity based assay repeated. For selective ampli®cation from the E.coli genome only the ®rst by utilizing lambda exonuclease to degrade one strand of a three steps are used. double stranded structure from the 5¢ phosphorylated end. Non-phosphorylated ends are resistant to lambda exonuclease degradation. Core adapter sequences were degraded by exonuclease treatment, however after ligation of the 5¢ overhang oligonucleotides, most of the adapter was protected from degradation suggesting ef®cient ligation of the overhang oligonucleotides was occurring (Fig. 2). Final phosphorylation of the adapter resulted in degradation of the adapter after lambda exonuclease treatment demonstrating ®nal phos- phorylation of the adapter was also occurring ef®ciently. Figure 2. Gel analysis of the effects of lambda exonuclease treatment on Escherichia coli genomic fragment isolation adapter assembly. Lanes 1 and 6, phosphorylated core adapter without overhang oligonucleotides; lanes 2 and 7, Adapter 1 without phosphoryl- The isolation of speci®c fragments from a complex mixture of ation; lanes 3 and 8, Adapter 1 with phosphorylation; lanes 4 and 9, fragments was ®rst tested on the 4.6 Mb E.coli genome which, Adapter 2 without phosphorylation; lanes 5 and 10, Adapter 2 with phos- when digested with BbvI, produces an estimated 18 000 DNA phorylation; lanes 1±5, without lambda exonuclease treatment; lanes 6±10, with lambda exonuclease treatment; lane 11, 50 bp DNA marker (Promega). fragments with variable 4-base, 5¢ overhangs. Three fragments DNA (1.25 pmol) was loaded onto 3% agarose gels and stained with were selected of 100, 150 and 200 bp in size from three Gelstar stain (Cambrex). random regions of the published genome and adapters were designed and prepared for ligation with the digested genomic DNA (Table 1). During the ligation process undesirable events are also likely to be occurring such as inter- and intra-fragment captured in closed circles. This was performed either directly ligation, ligation of an adapter to just one end of DNA from the circular target or on a target digested with NotI, to fragments and free adapter remaining un-ligated. To eliminate linearize the circular molecule. All three selected fragments these structures the ligation mix was treated with Bal31 were successfully ampli®ed from E.coli genomic DNA when nuclease to destroy all linear molecules but preserve circular single adapters were included in the ligation (Fig. 3). Each molecules. PCR using primer binding sites in the adapter and adapter selects for 1 of 32 768 fragment variants and so with DNA polymerase was then used to amplify all fragments 18 000 fragments generated from the E.coli genome the e21 Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 PAGE 4 OF 6 Table 1. Enzyme recognition and cleavage sites for genomic fragments selected from the E.coli and human genomic sequences Genomic fragment Location Left ¯anking sequence Right ¯anking sequence E.coli 100 bp 4229991±4230091 GACCGGGATATCGCTGC¼ ¼TCAATGCGTTTTGCTGC E.coli 150 bp 1976452±1976602 CAACGGAGGGGGGCTGC¼ ¼GCAGCTCCACCGATTTT E.coli 200 bp 4224653±4224853 GCAGCACGATGATTACA¼ ¼CACCATCTGGGAGCTGC Human 125 bp Chr19: 50040675±50040800 GCAGCACTATCCACAACAGCA¼ ¼GCAGCAAAAGCAAACAT Human 262 bp Chr19: 50152102±50152364 GCAGCCCTGTGGTCACCAGGA¼ ¼GGGGACTCACCACCTTGCTGC Human 318 bp Chr19: 51678472±51678790 GCAGCCACACAGGGCCATTGG¼ ¼GCAGCACACCACCACGC Human 499 bp Chr19: 51876594±51877093 CTATCCCGTGGAGCTGC¼ ¼GCAGCGTGGTGCTGGAT The BbvI recognition site is highlighted in bold and the 4-base 5¢ overhang sequence generated is underlined. The position of the second 4-base 5¢ overhang generated by digestion from the adapter incorporated recognition site is double underlined. The orientation of the cut site relative to the recognition site appears to alternate depending upon which strand contains the recognition sequence GCAGC. Genomic locations are indicated for the position of the cut sites. Escherichia coli genomic sequence was obtained from NC_000913. chance of selecting an additional fragment to the one targeted disadvantage during the PCR phase. The addition of high GC is 0.56. Multiplexing of the adapters in which all three were favorable components such as DMSO in addition to altering combined into the one ligation also demonstrated the primer, magnesium and enzyme concentrations also failed to successful ampli®cation of the three fragments. Further promote the appearance of the band. Downloaded from http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 16, 2015 optimization of adapter concentration and ligation conditions may help to minimize non-speci®c bands. DISCUSSION Human genomic fragment isolation We have described a technique for the speci®c ampli®cation To amplify four speci®c fragments from human genomic of DNA fragments from a complex genome using a small, DNA of 125, 262, 318 and 499 bp in size (Table 1), two rounds universal set of adapter-forming oligonucleotides. In the of selection were used. The ®rst round of capture was simplest construction of adapters, one of 256 variants for one performed on BbvI-digested human genomic DNA using the strand and one of 256 variants for the other strand could be four adapters either separately or in a pool of four adapters annealed, prior to ligation of the adapter to the genomic (Fig. 4A). If it is assumed the genome is fragmented into 6 fragment. Alternatively, a pre-ligation of short overhang million fragments as expected statistically for the BbvI digest, oligonucleotides to a common core adapter could be per- then an adapter that is 1 of 32 768 variants will select about formed to generate the adapter as we have demonstrated here. 188 unique fragments. However, other structures are likely to There are 256 possible combinations of the bases at each end form such as two or more genomic fragments ligated and of each adapter resulting in 65 536 possible adapters (func- captured into the adapter circleÐbut their frequency will be tionally this equates to 32 768 unique adapters because of lower. Figure 4A shows that after ampli®cation, DNA of a directional reversibility of the adapter). In this case a total of range of sizes was produced but on average the distribution is 512 adapter oligonucleotides are all that is required to produce centered around 500 bp. This distribution pattern is a result of all 32 768 possible variations of adapter overhangs. This the frequency of cutting and also the polymerase extension effectively results in an adapter which, when ligated with a time. fragmented genome of 6 million pieces, could capture in the A single round of selection would provide an ~32 000-fold order of 188 unique fragments in a single round of selection. puri®cation of genomic fragments and could provide a means The actual number and average size of genomic fragments for partial or whole genome ampli®cation; however, the may, however, be controlled by performing digests with ampli®cation of speci®c fragments from the human genome multiple enzymes. would require two rounds of selection. After the ®rst round Many of the alternative techniques for sequence complexity PCR with primer set A, the products were digested with FokI reduction currently available have found usefulness with small enzyme which recognizes a 5-base sequence incorporated in bacterial genomes because of their inherent lower complexity. the adapter but cuts into the captured genomic DNA. The For fragment selection on this scale our approach would be as released DNA was re-ligated with an adapter speci®c for the simple, and more rapid than most techniques currently in use. new overhangs generated in the genomic region of the ®rst- In our method, selection of a fragment from a bacterial capture DNA. After ligation, the DNA was again digested with genome would only require a genomic digestion, ligation, a Bal31 nuclease before ampli®cation with alternate PCR short nuclease digestion and one PCR to achieve the isolation primers to those used in the ®rst round. When a single adapter of any fragment from the genome. Achieving single fragment was used in each ligation for both the ®rst round and the isolation with other techniques is typically much more dif®cult second rounds of selection, a single band was produced for the because they are unable to achieve such a degree of selection 125, 262, 318 and 499 bp products (Fig. 4B). When all four in as few steps. adapters were combined for the ®rst step ligation and a second Two major applications of this technology would be for set of four were combined for the second step ligation all high-throughput production of speci®c DNA amplicons fragments were detected on the gel, except for the 499 bp for genotyping and mutation/polymorphism discovery. fragment. We believe the failure to visualize the 499 bp Traditionally, this would require PCR with locus-speci®c fragment in the multiplex reaction may be due to sequence primers and a large investment in the design, synthesis and features of the fragment that are leading to a competitive testing of large number of primers. With Universal Selective PAGE 5 OF 6 Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 e21 Figure 3. Isolation and ampli®cation of three fragments from the E.coli genome. Adapters with common primer binding sites (primer set A) were prepared with 5¢ overhangs speci®c for fragments of 100, 150 and 200 bp in size from the E.coli genome and ligated to BbvI-digested genomic DNA. The ligations were treated with Bal31 exonuclease before NotI digestion and PCR ampli®cation using primer set A and Taq polymerase as described in the Materials and Methods. Lane 1, 100 bp; lane 2, 150 bp; lane 3, 200 bp; lane 4, mix of 100, 150 and 200 bp adapters in the ligation; lane 5, Downloaded from http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 16, 2015 50 bp marker (Promega). PCRs (2 ml) were electrophoresed on 4% Nusieve agarose (FMC) and visualized with Gelstar stain. Expected bands (arrowed) run at higher molecular weights than the genomic fragments due to primer and adapter sequences that are co-ampli®ed. Ampli®cation, as we have described here, even high through- put, single-plex reactions would be more feasible. PCR Figure 4. (A) First-round ampli®cation of four fragments from the human conditions can be standardized through the use of common genome. Adapters with common primer binding sites (primer set A) were prepared with 5¢ overhangs speci®c for fragments of 125, 262, 318 and primers to allow parallel ampli®cation of speci®c loci, without 499 bp in size from the human genome and ligated to BbvI-digested human the need for designing primers and optimizing conditions for genomic DNA. The ligations were treated with Bal31 exonuclease before each locus. Furthermore, greater cost savings could be realized PCR ampli®cation using Vent polymerase and primer set A as described in by assembling all necessary adapters from a universal set of the Materials and Methods. Lane 1, 50 bp marker (Promega); lane 2, 125 bp less than 1000 oligonucleotides. The ability to perform adapter; lane 3, 262 bp adapter; lane 4, 318 bp adapter; lane 5, 499 bp adapter; lane 6, mix of 125, 262, 318 and 499 bp adapters in the ligation; multiplex isolations of fragments, by combining many pre- lane 7, 1 kb marker (NEB). Qiaquick (Qiagen) puri®ed PCRs (3 ml) were annealed adapter oligonucleotides in the one reaction, is also electrophoresed on 3% agarose and visualized with Gelstar stain (Cambrex). possible because a common primer set can be employed to (B) Second-round ampli®cation of four fragments from the human genome. amplify the captured DNA. Double-sided adapters would be Adapters with common primer binding sites (primer set B) were prepared with 5¢ overhangs speci®c for the second overhangs generated from critical for isolating tens of DNA fragments in one reaction fragments of 125, 262, 318 and 499 bp in size from the human genome and because a mixture of all required pairs of earlier proposed ligated to the FokI digested DNA. The ligations were treated with Bal31 single-sided adapters would produce an exponential number of exonuclease before PCR ampli®cation using Vent polymerase and primer undesired adapter combinations that would capture an excess set B as described in the Materials and Methods. Lane 1, 50 bp marker (Promega); lane 2, 125 bp; lane 3, 262 bp; lane 4, 318 bp; lane 5, 499 bp; of unwanted DNA. Due to removal of linear non-targeted lane 6, mix of 125, 262, 318 and 499 bp adapters in the ligation, PCRs (2 ml) DNA our process may also have advantages in producing were electrophoresed on 3% agarose and visualized with Gelstar stain. highly de®ned low complexity genomic fractions comprised Expected bands (arrowed) run at higher molecular weights than the genomic of hundreds or thousands of DNA fragments scattered over the fragments due to primer and adapter sequences that are co-ampli®ed. genome by using one, multiple or degenerate adapters. The use of a single primer pair for the ampli®cation of issues for large multiplexing experiments, alternatives such as multiple fragments in the one reaction, could however, isothermal ampli®cation (17) or the selection of shorter introduce other issues that impact upon PCR-based ampli®- fragments that are less in¯uenced by sequence factors may cation. Since each amplicon has the same primer binding site, prove more effective. Isothermal ampli®cation in particular competition between newly formed product and primers, as in should result in less in¯uence from primer competition for the any PCR, may lead to reduced yields of any one fragment in annealing target as occurs during each cycle of the PCR. later cycles. In addition, if the rate of full-length product Although the 499 bp fragment was not visualized on the gel it formation is dramatically different for some amplicons this may be present below the detection limit of the stain. may give a competitive advantage to more ef®cient amplicons Complete suppression would appear to be unlikely since that out-compete the less ef®cient amplicons over time. These during the ®rst round of selection with a single adapter several factors may underlie our observations for one fragment; a GC- hundred unique sequences were ampli®ed and from these, the rich amplicon of 499 bp that appeared to be suppressed by the 499 bp fragment could be isolated on the second round of ampli®cation of other amplicons with the same primer binding selection, suggesting the ®rst round of selection was ampli- sites in a multiplex reaction. Other possibilities for fying the 499 bp fragment within a multiplex of hundreds of this suppression may include differences in target concentra- fragments. tion (post-ligation) as a result of incomplete digestion or Although we have chosen exonuclease digestion to remove differences in ligation ef®ciencies. To overcome some of these unwanted fragments and adapter sequences in this study, other e21 Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 PAGE 6 OF 6 options are feasible such as a biotinylated, fully degenerated reactions before the intended DNA ampli®cation, is one that is blocking adapter that ligates to unused overhang sequences, cost-effective by utilizing a relatively small set of oligonu- which can then be removed by streptavidin coated beads. Used cleotides and one that can be easily standardized to allow rapid in an effective concentration, the blocking adapter can also and parallel ampli®cation of required genomic DNA reduce formation of undesired circles comprised of multiple fragments for high through-put genomic analysis in various non-targeted DNA fragments with or without an adapter. The species. Universal Selective Ampli®cation procedure could also be further simpli®ed by possibly eliminating PCR after ligating the ®rst adapter. In addition, cutting circular DNA and ligation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS of a second adapter may be performed in the same reaction if This work was funded by The National Institute of Standards two different adapter cores are used. The ®rst adapter would and Technology, Advanced Technology Program Project ID: use a core that has no priming sites but has two Type IIs 200-00-4467A restriction enzyme recognition sequences, and the second adapter would use a core that has priming sites but has no restriction enzyme recognition sequences. REFERENCES There are at least three commercially available Type IIs 1. Roberts,R.J., Vincze,T., Posfai,J. and Macelis,D. (2003) REBASE: enzymes that produce 4-base overhangs, and are not sensitive restriction enzymes and methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, to CpG methylation (BbvI, FokI and BspMI). There are also a 418±420. Downloaded from http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on August 16, 2015 number of alternative Type IIs enzymes available should the 2. Smith,D.R. (1992) Ligation-mediated PCR of restriction fragments from user choose not to use a 4-base overhang. Another alternative large DNA molecules. PCR Methods Appl., 2, 21±27. for increasing the number of enzymes available (by avoiding 3. Unrau,P. and Deugau,K.V. (1994) Non-cloning ampli®cation of speci®c DNA fragments from whole genomic DNA digests using DNA CpG methylation issues) is to treat the genomic DNA with one `indexers'. Gene, 145, 163±169. of a number of whole genome ampli®cation methods available 4. Guilfoyle,R.A., Leeck,C.L., Kroening,K.D., Smith,L.M. and Guo,Z. to generate non-methylated DNA. An additional six enzymes (1997) Ligation-mediated PCR ampli®cation of speci®c fragments from a that produce 4-base overhangs would be available in this case. class-II restriction endonuclease total digest. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 1854±1858. Our adapter assembly process, based on universal complete 5. Sibson,D.R. and Gibbs,F.E. (2001) Molecular indexing of human libraries of oligonucleotide building blocks, allows other genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, e95. advanced features to be engineered into the adapters such as 6. Kim,S.C., Podhajska,A.J. and Szybalski,W. (1988) Cleaving DNA at any internal informative cleavage sites that expose an overhang predetermined site with adapter-primers and class-IIS restriction complementary to an overhang from the genomic sequence enzymes. Science, 240, 504±506. 7. Velculescu,V.E., Zhang,L., Vogelstein,B. and Kinzler,K.W. (1995) after cleavage of the formed circles. Having two additional Serial analysis of gene expression. Science, 270, 484±487. pairs of 256-oligonucleotide libraries allows one to make 8. Vos,P., Hogers,R., Bleeker,M., Reijans,M., van de Lee,T., Hornes,M., adapters with 16 informative bases in one assembly reaction Frijters,A., Pot,J., Peleman,J., Kuiper,M. et al. (1995) AFLP: a new that would replace pairs of standard double-sided adapters technique for DNA ®ngerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 4407±4414. designed for two rounds of selection of a DNA fragment. In 9. Nelson,D.L., Ledbetter,S.A., Corbo,L., Victoria,M.F., Ramirez-Solis,R., Webster,T.D., Ledbetter,D.H. and Caskey,C.T. (1989) Alu polymerase this case two speci®c internal 4mers would be incorporated, in chain reaction: a method for rapid isolation of human-speci®c sequences addition to the two speci®c 4-base overhangs. In other from complex DNA sources. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 6686±6690. envisioned improvements, by designing several adapter 10. Ledbetter,S.A., Nelson,D.L., Warren,S.T. and Ledbetter,D.H. (1990) cores with different assembly overhangs, coupled with Rapid isolation of DNA probes within speci®c chromosome regions by interspersed repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction. Genomics, 6, corresponding libraries of building blocks, multiple double- 475±481. sided adapters could be assembled simultaneously. This could 11. Telenius,H., Carter,N.P., Bebb,C.E., Nordenskjold,M., Ponder,B.A. and occur during adapter ligation to genomic DNA to produce a Tunnacliffe,A. (1992) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general multiplexed DNA ampli®cation without prior pre-assembly of ampli®cation of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics, each individual adapter in its own separate assembly reaction. 13, 718±725. 12. Cheung,V.G. and Nelson,S.F. (1996) Whole genome ampli®cation using In conclusion, we have described a strategy for the a degenerate oligonucleotide primer allows hundreds of genotypes to be ampli®cation of speci®c genomic DNA fragments that utilizes performed on less than one nanogram of genomic DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. a small, but universal set of oligonucleotides. The novel Sci. USA, 93, 14676±14679. features of this approach include the ability to achieve greater 13. Jordan,B., Charest,A., Dowd,J.F., Blumenstiel,J.P., Yeh Rf,R.F., selection speci®city through the use of double-sided adapters Osman,A., Housman,D.E. and Landers,J.E. (2002) Genome complexity reduction for SNP genotyping analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, and DNA circle formation, and to such a degree that 2942±2947. ampli®cation of selected fragments from the human genome 14. Dong,S., Wang,E., Hsie,L., Cao,Y., Chen,X. and Gingeras,T.R. (2001) is possible. Due to high selectivity, any speci®c sequence can Flexible use of high-density oligonucleotide arrays for single-nucleotide be isolated using millions of fragments obtained by mixing polymorphism discovery and validation. Genome Res., 11, 1418±1424. 15. Kennedy,G.C., Matsuzaki,H., Dong,S., Liu,W.M., Huang,J., Liu,G., independent Type IIs restriction enzyme digests prior to Su,X., Cao,M., Chen,W., Zhang,J. et al. (2003) Large-scale genotyping adapter ligation or by performing multiple digests on the same of complex DNA. Nat. Biotechnol., 21, 1233±1237. DNA. The adapter ligation technique is also advantageous in 16. Russell,D.W. and Sambrook,J. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory ef®cient ampli®cation of various DNA sequences because it Manual. 3rd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring uses only universal primers under the same optimized Harbor, NY. 17. Dean,F.B., Nelson,J.R., Giesler,T.L. and Lasken,R.S. (2001) Rapid conditions, as indicated by the successful preparation of all ampli®cation of plasmid and phage DNA using Phi 29 DNA polymerase seven selected amplicons on the ®rst attempt. The procedure and multiply-primed rolling circle ampli®cation. Genome Res., 11, we have described, although requires a few preparatory 1095±1099.

References (18)

  1. Roberts,R.J., Vincze,T., Posfai,J. and Macelis,D. (2003) REBASE: restriction enzymes and methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 418±420.
  2. Smith,D.R. (1992) Ligation-mediated PCR of restriction fragments from large DNA molecules. PCR Methods Appl., 2, 21±27.
  3. Unrau,P. and Deugau,K.V. (1994) Non-cloning ampli®cation of speci®c DNA fragments from whole genomic DNA digests using DNA `indexers'. Gene, 145, 163±169.
  4. Guilfoyle,R.A., Leeck,C.L., Kroening,K.D., Smith,L.M. and Guo,Z. (1997) Ligation-mediated PCR ampli®cation of speci®c fragments from a class-II restriction endonuclease total digest. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 1854±1858.
  5. Sibson,D.R. and Gibbs,F.E. (2001) Molecular indexing of human genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, e95.
  6. Kim,S.C., Podhajska,A.J. and Szybalski,W. (1988) Cleaving DNA at any predetermined site with adapter-primers and class-IIS restriction enzymes. Science, 240, 504±506.
  7. Velculescu,V.E., Zhang,L., Vogelstein,B. and Kinzler,K.W. (1995) Serial analysis of gene expression. Science, 270, 484±487.
  8. Vos,P., Hogers,R., Bleeker,M., Reijans,M., van de Lee,T., Hornes,M., Frijters,A., Pot,J., Peleman,J., Kuiper,M. et al. (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA ®ngerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 4407±4414.
  9. Nelson,D.L., Ledbetter,S.A., Corbo,L., Victoria,M.F., Ramirez-Solis,R., Webster,T.D., Ledbetter,D.H. and Caskey,C.T. (1989) Alu polymerase chain reaction: a method for rapid isolation of human-speci®c sequences from complex DNA sources. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 6686±6690.
  10. Ledbetter,S.A., Nelson,D.L., Warren,S.T. and Ledbetter,D.H. (1990) Rapid isolation of DNA probes within speci®c chromosome regions by interspersed repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction. Genomics, 6, 475±481.
  11. Telenius,H., Carter,N.P., Bebb,C.E., Nordenskjold,M., Ponder,B.A. and Tunnacliffe,A. (1992) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general ampli®cation of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics, 13, 718±725.
  12. Cheung,V.G. and Nelson,S.F. (1996) Whole genome ampli®cation using a degenerate oligonucleotide primer allows hundreds of genotypes to be performed on less than one nanogram of genomic DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 14676±14679.
  13. Jordan,B., Charest,A., Dowd,J.F., Blumenstiel,J.P., Yeh Rf,R.F., Osman,A., Housman,D.E. and Landers,J.E. (2002) Genome complexity reduction for SNP genotyping analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2942±2947.
  14. Dong,S., Wang,E., Hsie,L., Cao,Y., Chen,X. and Gingeras,T.R. (2001) Flexible use of high-density oligonucleotide arrays for single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and validation. Genome Res., 11, 1418±1424.
  15. Kennedy,G.C., Matsuzaki,H., Dong,S., Liu,W.M., Huang,J., Liu,G., Su,X., Cao,M., Chen,W., Zhang,J. et al. (2003) Large-scale genotyping of complex DNA. Nat. Biotechnol., 21, 1233±1237.
  16. Russell,D.W. and Sambrook,J. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  17. Dean,F.B., Nelson,J.R., Giesler,T.L. and Lasken,R.S. (2001) Rapid ampli®cation of plasmid and phage DNA using Phi 29 DNA polymerase and multiply-primed rolling circle ampli®cation. Genome Res., 11, 1095±1099.
  18. Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 PAGE 6 OF 6 by guest on August 16, 2015

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What enhances specificity in the Universal Selective Amplification method?add

The method enhances specificity through exonuclease treatment and closed-circle formation using double-sided adapters, allowing precise capture of targeted DNA fragments.

How do Type IIs restriction enzymes contribute to fragment isolation?add

Type IIs restriction enzymes generate specific 4-base overhangs, enabling the digestion of genomic DNA into approximately 32,768 unique variants for targeted amplification.

What are the practical applications of this selective amplification technique?add

Applications include genotyping SNPs, isolating specific genes, and conducting high-throughput genomic analyses with reduced complexity and enhanced specificity.

How does this method compare to traditional PCR for complex genomes?add

Unlike traditional PCR, this method uses a universal set of oligonucleotides, resulting in significant cost savings and time efficiency during primer design and synthesis.

What factors might impact yield in multiplex PCR amplifications?add

Yield can be affected by competitive inhibition among amplicons with shared primer binding sites, leading to biased amplification of more efficient products.

About the author
BGI, Department Member
Papers
93
Followers
7
View all papers from Snezana Drmanacarrow_forward