Key research themes
1. How did the 1862 U.S.-Dakota War influence and reflect broader dynamics of U.S. frontier conflicts and governance during the Civil War era?
This research theme explores the 1862 U.S.-Dakota War not merely as a localized “Indian war” but as a conflict with national and geopolitical significance, especially in relation to the American Civil War. It highlights the ways in which settler expansion, treaty violations, and shifting federal priorities intersected to shape the war’s causes, conduct, and aftermath. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to situating the U.S.-Dakota War within frameworks of federal Indian policy expansion, ethnic conflict, and American military strategy during a pivotal historical moment.
2. How did Dakota people experience, resist, and reinterpret state power and identity during and after the 1862 War, particularly in incarceration and memory?
This theme investigates Dakota lived experiences during the war’s aftermath, focusing on incarceration, deportation, identity preservation, and cultural reclamation. It unearthed how Dakota prisoners engaged in ‘transgressive adoption’ of settler culture as a form of resistance, maintained kinship networks, and asserted agency within concentration camps and exile. Examining archaeological and linguistic evidence alongside prisoner correspondence reveals the complexities of Indigenous identity conflict, survival strategies, and contemporary commemorations, which challenge dominant narratives of disorganization and victimhood.
3. What do archaeological methods and landscape analyses reveal about the 1862 War’s battlefield realities and settler colonial spatial practices?
This theme emphasizes the increasing application of archaeological surveys, geospatial analyses, and landscape archaeology to elucidate tactical and symbolic aspects of the war, including material patterns of asymmetric warfare, use of sacred sites for military forts, and settler militarization strategies. These approaches deepen historiographical understanding by integrating Indigenous spatial practices and colonial transformations of sacred landscapes serving settler frontier control.















































































