Renewal of traditions, unbroken since Antiquity, rather than their “rebirth,” was the theme of Franco Simone’s view of the Renaissance in France (Il Rinascimento francese 1961, Eng. trans. 1969), a work that contributed decisively to the...
moreRenewal of traditions, unbroken since Antiquity, rather than their “rebirth,” was the theme of Franco Simone’s view of the Renaissance in France (Il Rinascimento francese 1961, Eng. trans. 1969), a work that contributed decisively to the redefinition of the French 15th c. not as a period of decline and decadence, nor the end-point of the old (“medieval”) culture and the threshold of the new, but as a period of “creative syntheses” and energetic renewal.
The present study sketches a piece of the picture previously unexplored by Prof. Simone (my mentor in graduate school), the invention in the 15th c. of the political drama in France.
This history is now well established but it was not so in 1970 when Franco Simone, presiding over a colloquium at the Collège de France on L’originalité du 15e siècle, replied to a question from the eminent theater historian Raymond Lebègue regarding the conspicuous absence of the theater from any sessions at the conference: “Yes, the theater,” replied Franco Simone, “We’re not there yet.”
Well, we’re there now. Political theater, which R. Lebègue’s work had touched on, flourished in the 16th c. (and beyond) as a vehicle for the propaganda of the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation, but it began life in the 15th c. amidst the artistic and intellectual ferment characterizing what Franco Simone considered the hallmark of the period: recombinations and modifications of disparate elements from the traditions of antiquity and medieval Christianity in new syntheses appropriate to a new age, a Renaissance marked by intense questioning and turmoil, an age that did not simply renew and modify past tradition, but reinvented its political, religious and esthetic structures of thought and expression. Such was the case in the transformation of the medieval morality play into a vehicle of political persuasion. That reinvention took shape in a play titled Le Concil de Basle after the ecumenical Council of Basel (1431-1437). Le Concil de Basle is the earliest known example in French of the use of the theater for the propagation of partisan political and ecclesiastical doctrines. Written in 1434 by an anonymous French cleric, it combines the form and techniques of the morality play with the subject matter of the political and ecclesiological treatise. This combination, apparently simple, is unknown in medieval French drama prior to the Le Concil de Basle of 1434.
The purpose of the play was to promote partisan doctrines, those of the conciliarist reform movement in the Church and of the pro-French (anti-Angloburgundian) peace-commission of the Council. That commission was instrumental in negotiating the Paix d’Arras (1435) which ended the civil war in France (Armagnacs and Bourguignons, 1417-1435). The Paix d’Arras marked the beginning of the end of the Hundred Years War and the realization of the desire of the author for the restoration of peace. By its successful intervention in civil politics, functioning as a sort of medieval United Nations, and by the success it achieved in its struggle for administrative supremacy in the Catholic church, the Council of Basel is exemplary of the originality of the 15th century in civil and ecclesiastical politics. In implementing its radically expanded formulation of the “conciliar theses” – itself a tour de force of recombined juridical principles and precedents already existing in the traditions of civil and Canon law – the Council of Basel laid the theoretical foundations for, and achieved in practice, the first successful application on a large scale, of representative democratic constitutionalism. That approach to institutional governance effectively challenged and constrained a supreme monarchical authority, the papacy, without recourse to force of arms, for the first time in Western history. The subsequent impact and repercussions of Baslean conciliarism in secular political theory were far-reaching: to 1688, 1776, 1789 and beyond.
The present essay summarizes the major ingredients – literary, political, ecclesiological – entering into the composition of two exemplary 15th-c. “creative syntheses”: (1) the Council of Basel, less important for having deposed Eugene IV than for having negotiated the Paix d’Arras and for having furnished principles and precedents for later theoreticians of secular constitutional parliamentarianism, and (2) Le Concil de Basle, the oldest extant example of a partisan political dramatic work in French, less important for its particular subject matter than for having extended the expressive possibilities of the medieval drama. In the same way, philosophers, theologians and writers in other literary genres manifested the “originality of the 15th century” by renewal of selected aspects of tradition, and creative recombinations of elements from a thousand years of cultural heritage, remodeled in original configurations appropriate to the needs and aspirations of 15th-c. France, most notably a model for modern representative governments, within and outside the Church.