Accurate sorting of commingled human remains comprises a fundamental requirement for all further anthropological analyses. The lower limb bones are particularly important for reconstructing biological profiles. This study introduces a...
moreAccurate sorting of commingled human remains comprises a fundamental requirement for all further anthropological analyses. The lower limb bones are particularly important for reconstructing biological profiles. This study introduces a metric technique for sorting these elements using eight standard anthropological measurements and 222 adult individuals from Greece. The bones utilized were the os coxae, the femora, the tibiae and the tali. Simple regression analyses were used to develop functions for reassociating articulating bones, providing strong correlations (r = 0.74–0.95, p-value <0.05) and high coefficients of determination (r 2 =0.54–0.91). Blind tests demonstrated that combining metric and morphoscopic techniques provides an excellent sorting accuracy for the hip and knee joints (ten of ten individuals), allowing for a reliable reassociation between a sex and age indicator (os coxae) and a body size indicator (femur). Overall, these results indicate the high value of metric methods in sorting commingled human remains. The presence of commingled human skeletal remains is a fundamental issue in anthropological studies, as it is the natural outcome of mass disasters, mass graves, or secondary burials. Regardless of the context, the accurate sorting of commingled remains is the basis for their further anthropological analysis. In a forensic context, it comprises the primary step for reconstructing the identity of unidentified human skeletal remains. In bioarcheological contexts, it can provide crucial demographic knowledge on the ancient population under study (1). Some of the most widely utilized techniques of sorting com-mingled human remains are entirely based on naked-eye observation. Their main criteria involve the morphological compatibility between two adjoining articular surfaces as well as the presence of similar morphological traits between two or more skeletal elements (i.e., texture, coloration, density). This similarity is due to various taphonomic or pathological factors which had a similar effect on multiple bones of the same skeleton (2,3). However, it should be noted that, as far as taphonomic factors are concerned, these often have similar effects on the entire assemblage (involving multiple individuals). Consequently, they may not always comprise an accurate criterion for sorting bones per individual. Moreover, the applicability and accuracy of these methods are influenced by an increased subjectivity in determining the degree of similarity and compatibility between two skeletal elements. These techniques also require the comparison of compatibility across all possible pairs of bones found in a commingled context, which can be an extremely time-consuming task in cases of large-scale commin-gling. Furthermore, this concept entirely relies on the assumption that both bones of each individual are actually preserved and recovered from the field. These limitations can be greatly reduced through the systematic development of original and more objective methods for sorting commingled human remains. If these techniques are proven to be of high precision and accuracy, they could substantially increase the level of certainty in associating a series of bone elements with the same individual. For this purpose, a previous research successfully combined morphoscopic and metric methodology to reassociate the skeletal elements of the subtalar joint (4). The regression equations produced gave a range of possible talus-calcaneus matches, and the morphoscopic evaluation gave the final match. It is crucial for the metric method to be applied first as it considerably reduces the number of possible matches. The method is reported to have rather accurate predictions and to be applicable on mixed-sex samples comprising specimens of both anatomical sides. In up to 95.98% of the cases, the difference between the real and the predicted value ranged between 0 and 2 mm. Finally, a blind test of a sample involving 20 individuals was performed, which presented a very high rate of correct sorting. Particularly in 89.5% for the left and 88.9% for the right skeletal elements, the examined bones were correctly attributed to the corresponding individual.