Planetary Nebulae

description587 papers

group69 followers

lightbulbAbout this topic

Planetary nebulae are astronomical objects formed from the ejected outer layers of a dying star, typically a red giant, during the late stages of stellar evolution. They are characterized by a shell of ionized gas surrounding a central white dwarf, and they play a crucial role in the chemical enrichment of the interstellar medium.

lightbulbAbout this topic

Key research themes

1. How can the spectral classifications and physical characteristics of Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae (CSPNe) inform evolutionary pathways and binary influence in nebular formation?

This research theme focuses on compiling extensive spectroscopic data of CSPNe to analyze their spectral types, physical parameters (such as luminosity, temperature, and surface gravity), and binary fraction. Understanding these characteristics is crucial for interpreting the late stages of stellar evolution, the role of binary interactions in planetary nebula (PN) shaping, and the chemical diversity seen in PN populations. The availability of large, updated catalogues enables statistical validation of evolutionary models and addresses the relative prevalence of hydrogen-rich versus hydrogen-poor central stars, linking multiplicity to nebular morphology and composition.

Catalogue of the central stars of planetary nebulae

by Belén Mari

2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics

Key finding: Compiled a new catalogue of 620 CSPNe with improved spectral classifications and physical data, increasing coverage by 25% over previous efforts. Found a hydrogen-rich to hydrogen-poor CSPNe ratio of approximately 2:1 and... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

Planetary nebulae with Wolf–Rayet-type central stars – II. Dissecting the compact planetary nebula M 2-31 with GTC MEGARA

by Gerardo Ramos-Larios

2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Key finding: Utilized integral field and long-slit spectroscopy to reveal M 2-31's spatio-kinematic structure, identifying bipolar fast outflows aligned perpendicularly to a toroidal waist structure enclosing a [WC]-type... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

Amateur PN discoveries and their spectral confirmation: A significant new addition to the Galactic PN inventory

by Dana Patchick

2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics

Key finding: Presented a decade-long collaborative effort led by amateur astronomers that contributed 209 spectroscopically confirmed Galactic PNe, representing ~5% of the known population. The discoveries, supported by spectral... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

keyboard_arrow_downShow more

2. How do the physical conditions, chemical abundances, and excitation mechanisms within planetary nebulae and their bipolar outflows elucidate nebular shaping and progenitor star characteristics?

This theme investigates the internal structure, spatial kinematics, and chemical composition of PNe, with special focus on bipolar morphologies and fast collimated outflows. Detailed spectroscopic and imaging studies resolve how nebular morphology relates to progenitor mass, chemical enrichment patterns, and dynamic interactions between fast winds and previously ejected material. Analyzing these aspects informs theories of nebular shaping, mass-loss histories, and the interplay between nucleosynthesis and nebular evolution.

Two new evolved bipolar planetary nebulae in the solar neighbourhood

by David Frew and

2015

Key finding: Identified and spectroscopically confirmed RCW 24 and RCW 69 as some of the nearest and largest evolved bipolar PNe, with enhanced nitrogen abundances and kinematics consistent with progenitors exceeding 2.0–2.5 M☉. Distances... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

Hu1-2: a metal-poor bipolar planetary nebula with fast collimated outflows

by Angels Riera

2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Key finding: Through narrow-band optical and near-IR imaging and spectroscopy, demonstrated that Hu1-2 has typical Type I PN helium and nitrogen enrichment but unusually low abundances in oxygen, neon, sulfur, and argon. High-velocity... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

keyboard_arrow_downShow more

3. What role does ionization modeling and nebular emission play in understanding planetary nebulae structure, dust content, and late stellar evolution phenomena such as Late Thermal Pulses (LTP)?

This theme covers theoretical and observational modeling of nebular ionization structures, dust spatial distribution, and transient evolutionary stages (e.g., LTPs) that modify CSPN and nebular properties. It encompasses computational photoionization models, dust extinction mapping via Balmer lines, and evolutionary tracks pertaining to thermal pulses occurring post-AGB. Addressing these aspects advances the understanding of nebular emission diagnostic interpretation, dust effects on morphology and spectra, and evolutionary pathways explaining uncommon or rapidly changing PN central stars.

Ionization Models of Planetary Nebulae

by J Patrick Harrington

2021, Symposium - International Astronomical Union

Key finding: Reviewed foundational and subsequent photoionization models accounting for hydrogen, helium, and heavy element ionization and temperature structures within PNe, emphasizing the importance of treating diffuse radiation... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

Dust distribution in planetary nebulae

by Armando Mudrik

2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Key finding: Implemented a technique combining narrow-band Hα and Hβ imaging to obtain intrinsic dust extinction maps in 29 PNe, circumventing contamination by nebular continuum and temperature dependencies typical in infrared dust... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

A closer look at low mass post-AGB late thermal pulses

by Timothy Lawlor

2023, MNRAS

Key finding: Presented stellar evolution models over a range of metallicities and masses demonstrating Late Thermal Pulse (LTP) phenomena characterized by helium flashes post-AGB departure causing rapid HR diagram looping. Showed that LTP... Read more

articleView Paper downloadDownload

keyboard_arrow_downShow more

All papers in Planetary Nebulae

Strasbourg-ESO Catalogue of Galactic Planetary Nebulae

by Agnes Acker

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

The Hα surface brightness - radius relation: a robust statistical distance indicator for planetary nebulae

by David Frew

Measuring the distances to Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe) has been an intractable problem for many decades. We have now established a robust optical statistical distance indicator, the Hα surface brightness -radius or S-r relation,... more

References: DM97 — De Marco et al. (1997); G91 — Goodrich (1991); KH93 — Kwok et al. (1993); VF15 — Vickers et al. (2015). Table Al. SED distances to pre-PNe and very young PNe. A6_ Bowshock nebulae

Figure 7. Top row (L): The distances from SSV compared with our Sy.—r distances, for PNe in common, with error bars omitted for clarity. (R): A comparisor with data from Meatheringham et al. (1988), Kingsburgh & Barlow (1992), and Kingsburgh & English (1994). Bottom row (L): A comparison with data fron Zhang (1995). (R): A comparison with data from Phillips (2002).

Table A3: Final calibrating nebulae for the S—r relation.

Figure 5. The total calibrating sample, over-plotted with evolutionary tracks from Blécker (1995) and Schénberner (1981) transformed to the Syq—r plane following Jacob et al. (2013). The most evolved PNe are at bottom right. A colour version of this figure is available in the online journal.

References: BO9 — Benedict et al. (2009); HO7 — Harris et al. (2007); H13 — Harrison et al. (2013); T11 — Tafoya et al. (2011). Table 1. Trigonometric distances for planetary nebulae from the literature used as calibrating objects. Note that the Hipparcos parallaxes have been excluded from this table.

Figure 3. S}.—r relation for the calibrating sample (excluding the Bulge objects), with morphology indicated by different symbols (refer to the text for more details). A colour version of this figure is available in the online journal.

Figure 6. Comparison of primary calibrating distances with our statistical distances for two subsets of Galactic calibrating PNe. Individual distance techniques are colour-coded, as shown in the key, and error bars are omit- ted for clarity. Three cluster distances are off-scale, and are not plotted. The top panel plots the primary calibrating distance (abscissa) against the long-trend S}y7q—r distance (ordinate) for optically-thick PNe; the resulting dispersion is 28%. The lower panel plots the primary distance against the short-trend S}z,_—r distance for optically-thin PNe; the resulting dispersion is only 18%. The lines in each panel have a slope of unity. A colour version of this figure is available in the online journal.

Table A4: A catalogue of Sy;,—1 distances to Galactic PNe

Figure 2. Top panel: S}j,-7 relation plotting the Galactic calibrating sam- ple of 206 PNe (crosses), as well as the the 126 extragalactic PNe from the LMC, SMC, and Sgr dwarf spheroidal galaxy (red diamonds), spanning >6.5 dex in surface brightness. The line is a least-squares bisector fit to the entire calibrating sample. The shallower gradient of the relation at small radii is compared with theoretical tracks in Fig. 5. Lower panel: Syo-r relation comparing Galactic Bulge PNe with the remaining PNe.

Table 10. Miscellaneous distance estimates for six PNe. Notes: Assumed uncertainty; ¥ assumed luminosity of 5000.M @ for the central stars of Abell 58 (V605 Aql), DPV 1 (V4334 Sgr) and Hen 1-5 (FG Sge) at maximum brightness. References: E84 —Eggen (1984); MA80— Mayor & Acker (1980); WB06 — Wesson et al. (2006); WOZ06 — Wareing et al. (2006).

Notes: t Assumed uncertainty; t corrected according to the precepts discussed in the text. References: AS12 — Akras & Steffen (2012); BM13 — Boumis & Meaburn (2013); C13 — Clayton et al. (2013); CS98 — Christianto & Seaquist (1998); GD15 — Garcia-Diaz et al. (2015); GG06 — Guzman et al. (2006); GLO9 — Guzman et al. (2009); GR11 — Guzman-Ramirez et al. (2011); H06 — Hajian (2006); HJ14 — Hinkle & Joyce (2014); HT95 — Hajian et al. (1995); HT96 — Hajian & Terzian (1996); KM96 — Kawamura & Masson (1996); LH02 — Li et al. (2002); M04 — Mellema (2004); MB12 — Miranda et al. (2012); MLO8 — Meaburn et al. (2008); OD09 — O’ Dell et al. (2009); OD13 — O'Dell et al. (2013); PBO2 — Palen et al. (2002); RB99 — Reed et al. (1999); RG06 — Ruiz et al. (2006); S04 — Sabbadin et al. (2004); SBO5 — Sabbadin et al. (2005); SJO5 — Schénberner et al. (2005b); Z08 — Zijlstra et al. (2008, and references therein). Table 6. Expansion distances for 29 planetary nebulae. For PNe with more than one determination, the adopted values are weighted means.

Table 7. PN distances from photoionization modelling. Notes: | Estimated uncertainty; ¥ distance given half-weight. References: B08 — Bohigas (2008); C87 — Clegg et al. (1987); D13 — Danehkar et al. (2013); EROS —Emprechtinger, Rauch & Kimeswenger (2005); H06 — Harrington (2006); MOO — Monteiro et al. (2000); M04 — Monteiro et al. (2004); M11 — Monteiro et al. (2011); MGO9 — Morisset & Georgiev (2009); RSM04 — Rice et al. (2004); SM06 — Schwarz & Monteiro (2006); U — unpublished data.

Table 14. Averaged distance ratios and nominal uncertainties of individual techniques using the mean S}jq-r relation. The lo uncertainties are a con- volution of the uncertainties in the individual distances and the uncertainties in the adopted Sy.—r distances (using sub-trends as described in the text).

Table 13. A catalogue of Sy q—r distances for Galactic PNe. The table is published in its entirety as an online supplement, and a portion is shown here fo: guidance regarding its form and content. Notes: C — calibrating object; P — object has vetted primary distance but not used as a calibrator (see text).

Figure 4. S}j.-7r relations for optically-thick and optically thin PNe, plot- ted separately. A colour version of this figure is available in the online jour- nal.

Figure 1. Major and minor axes over-plotted on three PNe, to show how the dimensions are determined; the elliptical isophotes have been omitted for clarity The objects are (from left to right) the double-shell elliptical NGC 2022, the bipolar Hubble 12, and the strongly asymmetric Sh 2-188 (image credits: Hubbl Legacy Archive and INT Photometric Ha Survey of the Northern Galactic Plane).

Table 3. PN distances derived from modelling close binary central stars. Note: ' Assumed uncertainty. References: BP94 — Bell et al. (1994); EB11 — Exter et al. (2011); EP05 — Exter et al. (2005); F99 - Ferguson et al. (1999); JB14 — Jones et al. (2014); PB94 — Pollacco & Bell (1994); RB11 — Ribeiro & Baptista (2011); SM10 — Stasiriska et al. (2010); TY 10 — Tovmassi

Reference: BC99 — Bond & Ciardullo (1999); BC03 — Benetti et al. (2003); BP02 — Bond & Pollacco (2002); BP03 — Bond et al. (2003); CB99 — Ciardullo et al. (1999); D14 — Douchin (2014); FK83 — Feibelman & Kaler (1983); FNC14 — Flagey et al. (2014); G72 — Greenstein (1972); LT80 — Longmore & Tritton (1980); M78 — Méndez (1978); MB13 — Miszalski et al. (2013); PM08 — Pereira et al. (2008); RCO1 — Rodriguez et al. (2001); RC10 — Ressler et al. (2010); SH97 — Strassmeier et al. (1997); SLO4 — Shen et al. (2004); TJ13 — Tyndall et al. (2013); WG11 — Weidmann & Gamen (201 1b); WW93 — Walsh et al. (1993); t.w. — this work. Table 2. Photometric / spectroscopic distances for resolved companions taken from the literature or derived as part of this study. Spectral types in- ferred from colours are given in italics.

Table 4. Adopted PN calibrators from cluster associations, separated into young and intermediate-age clusters (top) and old globular clusters (bot- tom). References: D08 — DallOra et al. (2008); F15 — Frew et al. (2015, in prep.); H96 — Harris (1996); J97 — Jacoby et al. (1997); LC04 — Lee et al. (2004); MB14 — Moni Bidin et al. (2014); MCO1 — Mermilliod et al. (2001); PF11 — Parker et al. (2011); TR11 — Turner et al. (2011); V12 — Vazquez (2012); vB06 — van den Bosch et al. (2006).

Table 15. A selection of statistical distance scales from the literature, nor- malised to the present work. 8 SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK

References: BBO1 — Bianchi et al. (2001); BH95 — Bauer & Husfeld (1995); CA07 — Corsico et al. (2007); D99 — Dreizler (1999); DH98 — Dreizler & Heber (1998); DM15 — De Marco et al. (2015); EB82 — Ebbets & Savage (1982); FH94 — Feibelman et al. (1994); G04 — Good et al. (2004); GB10 — Gianninas et al. (2010); HB95 — Hoare et al. (1995); HB04 — Herald & Bianchi (2004); HB11 — Herald & Bianchi (2011); HD96 — Hoare et al. (1996); HM90 — Herrero et al. (1990); KH97 — Koesterke & Hamann (1997); KW98 — Kruk & Werner (1998); LB94 — Liebert et al. (1994); LBO5 — Liebert et al. (2005); LG13 — Liebert et al. (2013); M88 — Méndez et al. (1988); MK92 — Méndez et al. (1992); MM97 — McCarthy et al. (1997); N99 — Napiwotzki (1999); NS95 — Napiwotzki & Schénberner (1995); QFO7 — Quirion et al. (2007); RF11 — Ringat et al. (2011); RHO2 — Rauch et al. (2002); RK99 — Rauch et al. (1999); RK04 — Rauch et al. (2004); RR14 — Reindl et al. (2014b); RZ07 — Rauch et al. (2007); SW97 — Saurer et al. (1997); THOS — Traulsen et al. (2005); U — unpublished data; W95 — Werner (1995); WD97 — Werner et al. (1997); WDO7 — Werner et al. (2007a); WRO7 — Werner et al. (2007b); ZRO9 — Ziegler et al. (2009); Z12 — Ziegler et al. (2012a). © 2002 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1-?? Table 5. Updated gravity distances using homogenised literature data. For CSPNe with multiple data, the adopted values are weighted means

Notes: * disparate values; object given half weight. References: A78 — Acker (1978); CB94 — Cappellaro et al. (1994); CV97 — Corradi et al. (1997); F08 — Frew (2008); GC11 — Giammanco et al. (2011); GP86 — Gathier et al. (1986); HW88 — Huemer & Weinberger (1988); KL85 — Kaler & Lutz (1985); M06 — Mampaso et al. (2006); NC12 — Navarro et al. (2012); P84 — Pottasch (1984); SBO5 —Sabbadin et al. (2005); SW84 — Solf & Weinberger (1984). Table 9. Extinction distances for planetary nebulae. PNe with |b| > 5° have been excluded from this table. Weighted averages are quoted for PNe with more than one independent distance determination.

Figure Al. PNe and mimics plotted in the Sy7.-r plane. Massive star ejecta (MSE), compact H Il regions, low-mass H II regions in the ISM, and CV-bowshock nebulae have been plotted separately to bona fide PNe (small black points). Several miscellaneous young PNe and PN-like nebulae discussed in the text are plotted as open blue circles with labels.

Method codes: B — eclipsing binary CSPN; C —- cluster membership; E — expansion parallax; G — gravity distance; H — HI absorption distance; K — kinematic method; M — photoionization model distance; P — photometric parallax; T — trigonometric parallax; X — extinction distance; Z - other distance estimate. Table 11. Final calibrating nebulae for the S}z.-r relation. The table is published in its entirety as an online supplement. A portion is shown here for guidance: regarding its form and content.

Note: Includes four Galactic halo PNe; LMC /SMC PNe, and 3 PNe from the Sgr dSph galaxy. Table 12. Summary of revised Sy —r relation best-fit constants for differ- ent PN subsets as defined in the text.

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

Planetary Nebulae: Observational Properties, Mimics and Diagnostics

by David Frew and

2010, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia

The total number of true, likely and possible planetary nebulae (PN) now known in the Milky Way is nearly 3000, double the number known a decade ago. The new discoveries are a legacy of the recent availability of wide field, narrowband... more

Figure 4 (a) A revised version of the SMB or log F(Ha)/F [Nu] versus log F(Ha)/F [Su] diagnostic diagram, where F[Nu] refers to the sum of the two red nitrogen lines at 446548, 6584A and F[Su] refers to the sum of the two red sulfur lines at 146717, 6731 A. The empirical boundaries for the PN field are modified here, based in part on new line fluxes from our unpublished database. Galactic PN are plotted as red dots, HH regions as asterisks, Galactic SNRs as filled blue triangles, Magellanic Cloud SNRs as open blue triangles, Galactic Hi regions as large black squares and extragalactic Hm regions as small black squares. We also plot a new domain, the realm of Type I PN (as defined by Kingsburgh & Barlow 1994). (b) The same plot as (a), showing in addition, symbiotic stars/outflows plotted as crosses, Galactic WR shells as orange squares, Cloud WR shells as open squares and Galactic LBV nebulae as green diamonds.

Figure 6 SHS (Parker et al. 2005) Ha+[Nu] image of He 2-111, a Type I PN surrounded by a huge, point-symmetric bipolar outflow first noted by Webster (1978). Image is 720” on a side with NE at top left.

Figure 5 (a) ‘BPT’ log F(5007)/HB versus log F(6584)/F (Ha) diagnostic diagram. (b) ‘BPT’ log F(5007)/Hf versus log F[Su]/F(Ha) diagnostic diagram. The curved boundaries are the classification curves from Kewley et al. (2006), separating star-forming galaxies (dominated by Hm regions) below and left of the line, from AGN. Symbols as in Figure 4.

Figure 1 Images of various PN mimics, adapted from DSS and SHS images. Top row, from left to right: (1) NGC 6164/65, a bipolar ejecta nebula around the Of star HD 148937 (By image, 10’ wide). (2) The faint shell around the Wolf-Rayet star WR 16 (Ha, 10’). (3) The WR ejecte nebula, PCG 11 (Ha, 5’). (4) Longmore 14, a reflection nebula (By, 5’). Second row: (1) Abell 77 (Sh 2-128), a compact Hu region (Rp, 5’). (2) The low-surface brightness, diffuse Hm region, vBe 1 (Ha, 10’). (3) Sh 2-174, a Hm region ionized by a hot white dwarf (Rp, 20’) (4) Bipolar symbiotic outflow, He 2-104 (Ha, 3’). Bottom row: (1) Faint bipolar nebula around the B[e] star, He 3-1191 (Ha, 4’). (2) The olc nova shell around GK Per (Rp, 5’). (3) Blue compact galaxy He 2-10 (Rp, 5’). (4) The true PN PHR J1424-5138 as a comparison object. Note the unusually bright CS relative to the low nebular surface brightness for this particular PN (Ha, 5’).

Figure 2 Representative PN spectra showing the diversity in line-ratios amongst the class. Top row: (L) NGC 7009, a typical PN of medium-high excitation; (R) RCW 69 (Frew, Parker & Russeil 2006), a reddened, bipolar Type I PN with very strong [Nu] lines; Second row: (L) RPZM 31, a compact VLE PN with no [Om] emission; (R) PFP 1 (Pierce et al. 2004), a highly-evolved, non-Type I PN with quite strong [Nu] lines; Bottom row: (L) K 1-27, a peculiar PN with very high excitation — note the very strong 14686 Hell line and the complete absence of [Nu] and [S11] lines; (R) PHR J1641-5302, a high excitation PN around a [WO4] central star; note the broad emission feature from the CS near 4650A due to Cm and Hen, and the Crv feature at 5806 A. This PN also has a dense unresolved core (Parker & Morgan 2003) with strong 44363 emission. All spectra cover the same wavelength range (4000-7500 A) and were taken with the SAAO 1.9-m reflector, except for RPZM 31 which was observed with 6dF on the 1.2-m UKST; some bright lines have been truncated for clarity.

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

BINARY CENTRAL STARS OF PLANETARY NEBULAE DISCOVERED THROUGH PHOTOMETRIC VARIABILITY. II. MODELING THE CENTRAL STARS OF NGC 6026 AND NGC 6337

by Orsola De Marco

2010, The Astronomical Journal

Close-binary central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) provide an opportunity to explore the evolution of PNe, their shaping, and the evolution of binary systems undergoing a common-envelope phase. Here, we present the results of... more

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

Polytropic dark haloes of elliptical galaxies

by Curtis J Saxton

2010

The kinematics of stars and planetary nebulae in early-type galaxies provide vital clues to the enigmatic physics of their dark matter haloes. We fit published data for 14 such galaxies using a spherical, self-gravitating model with two... more

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

K 1-6: An Asymmetric Planetary Nebula with a Binary Central Star

by David Frew and

2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia

We present new imaging data and archival multiwavelength observations of the little-studied emission nebula K 1-6 and its central star. Narrow-band images in Hα (+[N II]) and [O III] taken with the Faulkes Telescope North reveal a... more

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

Planetary Nebulae Near the Galactic Center I: Method of Discovery and Preliminary Results

by Robert Olling

1989, Planetary Nebulae

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

H2 Infrared Line Emission From the Ionized Region of Planetary Nebulae

by Isabel Aleman

2010, Arxiv preprint arXiv:1012.4477

descriptionView Paper arrow_downwardDownload

Collision strengths for nebular [O III] optical and infrared lines

by Taha Sochi

We present electron collision strengths and their thermally averaged values for the forbidden lines of the astronomically abundant doubly-ionized oxygen ion, O^{2+}, in an intermediate coupling scheme using the Breit-Pauli relativistic... more

Planetary Nebulae

Key research themes

1. How can the spectral classifications and physical characteristics of Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae (CSPNe) inform evolutionary pathways and binary influence in nebular formation?

2. How do the physical conditions, chemical abundances, and excitation mechanisms within planetary nebulae and their bipolar outflows elucidate nebular shaping and progenitor star characteristics?

3. What role does ionization modeling and nebular emission play in understanding planetary nebulae structure, dust content, and late stellar evolution phenomena such as Late Thermal Pulses (LTP)?

Related Topics

All papers in Planetary Nebulae