Sociological theory has many faces. The overview of current books which are classified as theoretical allows us to distinguish two major types of theorizing. Some authors treat theory as the explanation of observed events and phenomena,...
moreSociological theory has many faces. The overview of current books which are classified as theoretical allows us to distinguish two major types of theorizing. Some authors treat theory as the explanation of observed events and phenomena, attained by discovering general and universal mechanisms of social life represented by social laws. They answer 'why questions'. This is a rigid idea of a theory, patterned on the practice of some of the 'hard' natural sciences. But it is not the dominant approach. Today most famous and widely read theoretical contributions are of a different order. They aim at providing orientation in the chaos of social events and phenomena which surround us, by means of generalized diagnoses of social condition. These are not just concrete descriptions in common-sense terms, but generalized descriptions using special, more sophisticated and precise vocabulary,And they do not avoid value judgements, depicting visions of 'the good society', that sometimes border on new utopias. This brand of theorizing becomes particularly relevant in a time of rapid and fundamental social change, when not only ordinary people but sociologists stand baffled in view of the emerging new social world surrounding them and ask: where we are, where have we come from, and where we are going. We undoubtedly live in such a period. The awareness of the novelty and uniqueness of our epoch is rendered by the multiple terms now widely used in sociological discourse: postmodernity, late modernity, high modernity, second modernity, reflexive modernity, risk society, network society, information society, globalized society, and the most recent in this list-Ulrich Beck's cosmopolitan society. For the common people and sociologists alike the question 'What is going on?' becomes more pressing than the question 'Why do these events happen?'. Hence the proliferation of 'diagnostic' rather than 'explanatory' theories, attempting to squeeze reality into some orderly conceptual framework, some manageable model that would give defined meaning to the perceived transformations and also promise a future, better world. The famous social theorists of our time-Jurgen Habermas, Anthony Giddens, Zygmunt Bauman, Manuel Castells, Jean Baudrillard and others-have provided various generalized and axiologically tainted diagnoses of this sort (sometimes as a second track to their universal, explanatory models, e.g. Habermas's communication theory, Giddens's structuration theory etc.). Ulrich Beck joins their ranks with the two volumes under review, originally published in Germany and now available in English. I would suggest that they should be read in the reverse order of publication: Cosmopolitan Vision first, because it explicates the foundations of Beck's theory (generalized diagnosis), and Power in the Global Age after, because it provides more concrete applications of the theory, particularly to the domain of politics, both internal and international. In both books he extends and elaborates some ideas already hinted at in the earlier, well-known works on the 'risk society' and 'second modernity'. The reader who is acquainted with those will have a much easier task understanding the recent volumes. But the scope and ambition of the present project (with the third volume on Cosmopolitan Europe already announced) is incomparably larger. Beck's theoretical program is getting persistently enriched.