Ilias Anagnostakis,The Balkan paroinia or paranoia. The intoxication of war and the drinking skull cup of Krum/ La paroinia balkanique : l’ivresse de la guerre et la coupe de Krum, in Τέχνη και τεχνική στα αμπέλια και τους οινεώνες...
moreIlias Anagnostakis,The Balkan paroinia or paranoia. The intoxication of war and the drinking skull cup of Krum/ La paroinia balkanique : l’ivresse de la guerre et la coupe de Krum, in Τέχνη και τεχνική στα αμπέλια και τους οινεώνες της Β. Ελλάδος, 9o Τριήμερο εργασίας, Αδριανή Δράμας, 25-27 Ιουνίου 1999, Athens 2002, p. 138-167, (in Greek with French summary, p. 349-350).
Η παροινία των Βαλκανίων: Η μέθη του πολέμου και το ποτήρι του Κρούμου, in Τέχνη και τεχνική στα αμπέλια και τους οινεώνες της Β. Ελλάδος, 9o Τριήμερο εργασίας, Αδριανή Δράμας, 25-27 Ιουνίου 1999, Athens 2002, p. 138-167, (in Greek with French summary, p. 349-350).
The subject of this study was, to some extent, a choice of emotional charge based on recent events in the Balkans and Yugoslavia at the end of the second millennium, as well as the existing paranoia, intoxication, and irrationality. The desire for power, the intoxication of war, the violent displacements and blood that flowed from the lairs of the god of the modern American and nowdays Trump war machine inevitably recall some similar Byzantine and primarily Balkan events. A Byzantine scholar might describe this warlike Trump irrationality as paroinia, or extreme intoxication, and the supposed humanitarian intervention as a destructive invasion in a productive vineyard.
During the reign of Nikephoros I and Krumus of the Bulgarians, the empire's vineyard attempts to transplant its vines to the Balkans. According to the sources, the Byzantine warlords protect the Byzantine vineyard, plunder, crush their enemies like grapes, destroy the foreign vineyard/state, and enjoy the must of a conflict in which even their horses become intoxicated by the sweet wine of war. Thus, continuing an ancient perception and practice, the Byzantines believe that a war, like the first and model of Troy, always requires wine for strength and animation, while the state requires the power of the vineyard's vast vegetation and the culture of its products.
However, in a way that is unprecedented for mediaeval matters, the issue of vineyard destruction, or the complete uprooting of vines from a Balkan region, is emphasised as a historical event rather than a symbol. And this uprooting is nothing more than a failed attempt to uproot the Greek, Roman, and Christian wine-making cultures, to subjugate a population and convert it to customs unrelated to wine, in accordance with the dictates of a new barbaric anti-Byzantine domination.
Therefore, this paper argues that the legend of the uprooting of vineyards and the annihilation of the Avars due, among other things, to wine drinking, the story of imperial Byzantine skull cup, and Krumus' banquet with the subjugated rulers do not provide us with evidence about the peoples they purport to concern, but rather provide us with more information about the Byzantines themselves, from whom they have been only transmitted down to us.
Although this narrative is seen as an Avar tragedy and a Bulgarian sober mindset, the Byzantines who recorded it had an uncertain attitude towards vineyards and wine usage, as well as a complete disregard for drunkenness. The narrative constitutes an explosive libel against Nikephoros, who is detested by the monks, and an excessively austere, ascetic attitude to wine culture.
Wine is a cosmic weapon, and its acquisition, usage, and administration by unfettered power or individual will is as lethal as a bomb in all directions. The conflict between Nikephoros and Krum, therefore, lends itself to many readings from the perspective of wine semiology, either as a destruction or a claim of the vineyard-state by the wine-making power, or as an adoption of the wine culture in its Christian, but also extremely barbaric version and pathology.
In conclusion, the Balkans exhibit this disease once more. As passed down to us by the patriarch Photius in the ninth century, Apollonius condenses the pathology, the paroinia, and the power in his sardonic words. Domitian, the Roman emperor, forbids the removal of genitalia and the planting of vines, but he also enacts legislation requiring the removal of all existing vines: And Apollonius (presented as being ascetically indifferent, needing neither physical pleasure nor worldly goods)will remark that, in his opinion, it is the same for him, since he does not require wine or genitalia, but his majesty failed to recognise that by sparing men's testicles, he is castrating the earth.