
Adbhut P Singh
Research Scholar, Department of Education, University of Lucknow.
Supervisors: Prof. Dinesh Kumar
Phone: 8840405277
Address: Department of Education, University of Lucknow, Lucknow
Supervisors: Prof. Dinesh Kumar
Phone: 8840405277
Address: Department of Education, University of Lucknow, Lucknow
less
Uploads
Papers by Adbhut P Singh
Stats
Citations
References (12)
Share
More
spotlight-branding-logo
Research Spotlight
Want to get 4x more reads of your article?
Showcase your recent work in a Spotlight to get 4x more reads on average. Learn more
Create Spotlight
Abstract
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is a substantial departure from India’s educational environment, reflecting the dynamic demands of the modern day. This study examines NEP 2020’s transformative potential by exploring its possibilities for flexible curricular structures and multiple entry- exit systems. It dives into the notions of educational flexibility and multiple entry-exit systems within the background of educational reform by conducting an exhaustive literature review. Educational flexibility emphasises addressing varying learning requirements and advancing innovative teaching strategies. Flexible curriculum structures provide personalised learning paths by adapting differences in students’ pace, interests, and learning styles. According to research, such strategies boost student involvement, motivation, and academic performance. However, obstacles such as resistance to change and budget limits prevent the effective adoption of flexible educational methods. Similarly, multiple entry-exit systems have drawn notice for their potential to boost access, equity, and efficiency in tertiary education. These systems permit pupils to enter and leave educational programmes at different stages, which promotes lifelong learning and skill enhancement. Nonetheless, issues linger over the acknowledgement of partial qualifications, credit transfer mechanisms, and assurance of quality. This paper uses a critical appraisal of NEP 2020 to assess its alignment with the ideas of educational flexibility and multiple entry-exit systems. This study adds to the conversation around transformative education and curricular reform in India by explaining the implications and issues related to the execution of NEP 2020. Keywords: NEP 2020, educational flexibility, multiple entry-exit systems, lifelong learning.
economic fabric, with ancient institutions like Takshashila and Nalanda serving as global
centres of education (Sen, 1999). The Gurukul system exemplified India’s early commitment
to education, fostering close teacher-student relationships (Frawley, 2014). The colonial period
marked a shift towards a more structured higher education system, and post-independence,
India witnessed a surge in university creation to address the need for a skilled workforce
(Pandey, 2013). Key milestones in post-independent India include the National Policy on
Education (NPE) 1986, the Program of Action (PoA) 1992 and the National Education Policy
(NEP) 2020, emphasizing access, equity, and quality. Contemporary higher education in India
is undergoing transformative changes driven by globalization, technological advancements,
and an increased focus on interdisciplinary studies. Online learning platforms, the integration
of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and a heightened emphasis on research and innovation
characterize the dynamic nature of the educational ecosystem. However, these transitions pose challenges in maintaining and enhancing education quality, requiring a closer examination
of diverse institutions, relevant curricula, and effective quality assurance mechanisms (Mishra,
2019). Initiatives such as the Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) and Skill India
highlight the commitment to improving the quality and relevance of higher education within
this dynamic context (NSDC, 2015), setting the stage for an exploration of quality assurance
aspects in ongoing transitions.