IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/346005.html

Food-Scanners as a Radical Innovation in German Fresh Produce Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Goisser, Simon
  • Mempel, Heike
  • Bitsch, Vera

Abstract

Originally advertised as tools for end-consumers, portable food-scanners have recently reached a high level of awareness and show potential as instruments for quality assessment along fruit and vegetable supply chains. The current study explores preferences and concerns of chain actors regarding the implementation of this technology through semi-structured interviews. Results indicate that food-scanners could facilitate quality control at different levels of the fresh produce supply chain by providing fast, non-destructive and objective measurements. Concerns about the application of food-scanners could be identified with respect to potential additional requirements of fruit wholesaler resulting in more pressure on producers. To further a goal-oriented and user-directed development of this new technology, future research should be directed at its impacts on perception of fruit quality along the chain as well as end-consumers’ readiness to use these devices in everyday life.

Suggested Citation

  • Goisser, Simon & Mempel, Heike & Bitsch, Vera, 2020. "Food-Scanners as a Radical Innovation in German Fresh Produce Supply Chains," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(02), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346005
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346005/files/FOOD-SCANNERS%20AS%20A%20RADICAL%20INNOVATION.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.346005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pantano, Eleonora, 2014. "Innovation drivers in retail industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 344-350.
    2. Yu, Min & Nagurney, Anna, 2013. "Competitive food supply chain networks with application to fresh produce," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 273-282.
    3. Michael Antioco & Mirella Kleijnen, 2010. "Consumer adoption of technological innovations : Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation," Post-Print hal-02312561, HAL.
    4. Rong, Aiying & Akkerman, Renzo & Grunow, Martin, 2011. "An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 421-429, May.
    5. Robert D. Dewar & Jane E. Dutton, 1986. "The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1422-1433, November.
    6. Anetta Barska & Joanna Wyrwa, 2017. "Innovations in the food packaging market - intelligent packaging - a review," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 35(1), pages 1-6.
    7. M. Antioco & M. Kleijnen, 2010. "Consumer adoption of technological innovations Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation," Post-Print hal-00387308, HAL.
    8. Kislev Yoav & Nira Shchori-Bachrach, 1973. "The Process of an Innovation Cycle," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(1), pages 28-37.
    9. Douthwaite, B. & Keatinge, J. D. H. & Park, J. R., 2001. "Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 819-836, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jayaswal, Pragya & Parida, Biswajita, 2023. "The role of augmented reality in redefining e-tailing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Yi-Kuei Lin & Cheng-Fu Huang & Yi-Chieh Liao, 2019. "Reliability of a stochastic intermodal logistics network under spoilage and time considerations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(1), pages 95-118, June.
    3. Mendoza, Mario A. & Rodriguez Alfonso, Mauricio & Lhuillery, Stephane, 2021. "A battle of drones: Utilizing legitimacy strategies for the transfer and diffusion of dual-use technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Ma, Jun & Nault, Barrie R. & Tu, Yiliu (Paul), 2023. "Customer segmentation, pricing, and lead time decisions: A stochastic-user-equilibrium perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Nel, Jacques & Boshoff, Christo, 2021. "“I just don't like digital-only banks, and you should not use them either†: Traditional-bank customers' opposition to using digital-only banks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Godart, Frédéric & Pistilli, Luca, 2024. "The multifaceted concept of disruption: A typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    9. Chawla, Umesh & Verma, Balraj & Mittal, Amit, 2024. "Resistance to O2O technology platform adoption among small retailers: The influence of visibility and discoverability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Liao, Shuling & Chou, Cindy Yunhsin & Lin, Tzu-Han, 2015. "Adverse behavioral and relational consequences of service innovation failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 834-839.
    11. V. R. Ghezavati & S. Hooshyar & R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2017. "A Benders’ decomposition algorithm for optimizing distribution of perishable products considering postharvest biological behavior in agri-food supply chain: a case study of tomato," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(1), pages 29-54, March.
    12. Rieple, Alison & Snijders, Sylvia, 2018. "The role of emotions in the choice to adopt, or resist, innovations by Irish dairy farmers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 23-31.
    13. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Alex Ntsiful, 2025. "Sharing is caring for the environment: But why would managers resist shared mobility?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 612-633, January.
    15. Aman Kumar & Amit Shankar & Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Hae-Jung Hong, 2025. "Understanding dark side of online community engagement: an innovation resistance theory perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 13-39, March.
    16. Lejarza, Fernando & Baldea, Michael, 2022. "An efficient optimization framework for tracking multiple quality attributes in supply chains of perishable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 890-903.
    17. Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Hajiheydari, Nastaran, 2020. "On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 180-194.
    18. Kemi Adeyeye & John Gallagher & Aonghus McNabola & Helena M. Ramos & Paul Coughlan, 2021. "Socio-Technical Viability Framework for Micro Hydropower in Group Water-Energy Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Hameed, Irfan & Hameed, Imran & Akram, Umair & Arain, Ghulam Ali & Eid, Riyad, 2024. "Exploring resistance barriers in travelers' word of mouth for mobile payment systems: Mediating effects of trust and usage intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Friedman, Nicola & Ormiston, Jarrod, 2022. "Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.