Harold Spaeth

Ideological Values and the Votes of U

The Supreme Court Compendium

by Harold Spaeth and J. Segal

The Norm of Consensus on the U. S Supreme Court

Page 1. The Norm of Consensus on the US Supreme Court Lee Epstein Washington University in St. Lo... more

The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

... The Supreme Court and the artitudinal model revisited / Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth. .... more

Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited

The Journal of Politics, 1995

Download

Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

The Journal of Politics, 1998

Download

The outcome-prediction strategy in cases denied certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court

Public Choice, 2007

We investigate whether the substantial use of the outcome-prediction strategy by Supreme Court ju... more We investigate whether the substantial use of the outcome-prediction strategy by Supreme Court justices occurs in the petitions denied certiorari by the Court. We show with a computer simulation that [Caldeira, G.A., Wright, J.R., &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp; Zorn, C.J.W. (1999). Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15, 549–572], who modeled the missing final votes for denied petitions in order to include them

Attitudes about Attitudes

Michigan Law Review, 2003

... They mention the vote was six to three, but they neglect to mention that Justices Sandra Day ... more

Aggressive Grants by Affirm-Minded Justices

American Politics Research, 2002

Given that the Supreme Court usually reverses the decision of the court below, why would justices... more Given that the Supreme Court usually reverses the decision of the court below, why would justices who agree with that decision vote to hear the case? In other words, why would affirmminded justices vote to grant cert? Scholars refer to such behavior as the outcome prediction strategy. We examine its putative presence on the Vinson and Warren courts because valid

The Constraint of Law: A Study of Supreme Court Dissensus

American Politics Research, 2007

To study the behavior of judges, one must first consider whether judges are just like any other p... more To study the behavior of judges, one must first consider whether judges are just like any other political actor (e.g., legislators) or whether, because of their affiliation with the judiciary, law constrains their behavior to some extent. Research aimed at considering the extent to which judges are constrained by the law is sparse, and conclusions resulting from such research are

Norms, Dragons, and Stare Decisis: A Response

American Journal of Political Science, 1996

Participants in this forum have raised a number of questions about our study examining the influe... more

The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

American Journal of Political Science, 2001

Page 1. The Norm of Consensus on the US Supreme Court Lee Epstein Washington University in St. Lo... more

Supreme Court Decision Making

by David Rohde and Harold Spaeth

... Supreme Court decision making. Post a Comment. CONTRIBUTORS: Author: Rohde, David W. Author: ... more

Uploads

Papers by Harold Spaeth

Log In