VIDAMOR CABANNAS
Biography of Vidamor Cabannas
Vidamor Cabannas is a contemporary thinker and researcher dedicated to constructing a new scientific and philosophical paradigm, whose central axis is the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Conceived over decades of reflection, logical systematization, and critical analysis of the scientific and philosophical tradition, this theory aims to offer a rigorous ontology, grounded on seven absolute truths, which function as axiomatic principles to explain the genesis of the universe and the fundamental structure of reality.
Cabannas’s work is rooted in the long-standing dialogue between philosophy, mathematics, and science, but it takes an innovative step by proposing a logical, axiomatic, and geometric foundation of reality. Unlike other cosmological or physical approaches that begin with isolated empirical hypotheses, the Theory of Objectivity is built upon self-evident deductive bases, from which the existence of the fundamental forces, the emergence of matter, space, time, and even consciousness can be derived.
Among Cabannas’s writings, particular emphasis is placed on his systematic presentation of the eras of the universe — from the primordial Nothingness to the formation of matter, plasma, and the units of reason. These texts constitute a scientific and ontological narrative that connects mathematics, physics, and philosophy within a single explanatory framework.
The scientific potential of the Theory of Objectivity is vast:
In physics, it opens the way to a reformulation of the fundamental forces of nature, explained not as isolated entities but as necessary expressions of the absolute truths.
In cosmology, it offers a logical model of the genesis and evolution of the universe, distinct from both inflationary cosmology and multiverse theories.
In epistemology, it establishes a new mode of validating knowledge, grounded in logical consistency and in the progressive testability of its empirical consequences.
In the cognitive sciences and philosophy of mind, it interprets consciousness as an emergent phenomenon of fundamental structures of reality, without reducing it to a mere physical epiphenomenon.
With the Theory of Objectivity, Vidamor Cabannas not only inaugurates a new field of inquiry but also positions himself among the thinkers who dared to propose a universal ontology capable of articulating science, philosophy, and mathematics under the same horizon. His work, still in the process of diffusion and validation, carries the potential to become the foundation of a new physics and a new cosmology, placing the very notion of objectivity at the heart of contemporary epistemology.
Address: Feira de Santana - Bahia - Brasil
Vidamor Cabannas is a contemporary thinker and researcher dedicated to constructing a new scientific and philosophical paradigm, whose central axis is the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Conceived over decades of reflection, logical systematization, and critical analysis of the scientific and philosophical tradition, this theory aims to offer a rigorous ontology, grounded on seven absolute truths, which function as axiomatic principles to explain the genesis of the universe and the fundamental structure of reality.
Cabannas’s work is rooted in the long-standing dialogue between philosophy, mathematics, and science, but it takes an innovative step by proposing a logical, axiomatic, and geometric foundation of reality. Unlike other cosmological or physical approaches that begin with isolated empirical hypotheses, the Theory of Objectivity is built upon self-evident deductive bases, from which the existence of the fundamental forces, the emergence of matter, space, time, and even consciousness can be derived.
Among Cabannas’s writings, particular emphasis is placed on his systematic presentation of the eras of the universe — from the primordial Nothingness to the formation of matter, plasma, and the units of reason. These texts constitute a scientific and ontological narrative that connects mathematics, physics, and philosophy within a single explanatory framework.
The scientific potential of the Theory of Objectivity is vast:
In physics, it opens the way to a reformulation of the fundamental forces of nature, explained not as isolated entities but as necessary expressions of the absolute truths.
In cosmology, it offers a logical model of the genesis and evolution of the universe, distinct from both inflationary cosmology and multiverse theories.
In epistemology, it establishes a new mode of validating knowledge, grounded in logical consistency and in the progressive testability of its empirical consequences.
In the cognitive sciences and philosophy of mind, it interprets consciousness as an emergent phenomenon of fundamental structures of reality, without reducing it to a mere physical epiphenomenon.
With the Theory of Objectivity, Vidamor Cabannas not only inaugurates a new field of inquiry but also positions himself among the thinkers who dared to propose a universal ontology capable of articulating science, philosophy, and mathematics under the same horizon. His work, still in the process of diffusion and validation, carries the potential to become the foundation of a new physics and a new cosmology, placing the very notion of objectivity at the heart of contemporary epistemology.
Address: Feira de Santana - Bahia - Brasil
less
InterestsView All (8)
Uploads
Papers by VIDAMOR CABANNAS
The analysis confronts the surveyed applications of geometric algebra with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), especially its modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. It argues that geometric algebra does not constitute a cosmological theory and does not replace the modal-ontological foundation of TO. Nevertheless, it may serve as a powerful auxiliary language for the future formalization of TO, particularly in relation to boundary, recursive composition, logical tracks, triadic observation, convergence zones, and information/radiation structures.
The article also considers the TO interpretation according to which the transcendent element is knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. In this sense, the analyzed work is read as an important methodological bridge between TO and contemporary mathematical physics, information theory, signal processing, artificial intelligence, robotics, and applied geometry.
This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT.
Keywords: Teoria da Objetividade; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Theory of Objectivity; geometric algebra; Clifford algebra; Eckhard Hitzer; Manos Kamarianakis; George Papagiannakis; Petr Vašík; modal ontology; cosmology; boundary; recursive composition; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; atomic radiation; information; mathematical formalization; artificial intelligence; contemporary physics.
The article argues that Smarandache’s proposal offers a strong field of dialogue with TO by treating continuity as a scale-dependent appearance and discretization as a physically meaningful structure. At the same time, it identifies important tensions: FPW/FPS/FPM do not begin from the spherical logical Nothingness, do not modally deduce the necessity of discreteness, and do not provide a complete cosmogony equivalent to that of TO. The analysis therefore situates FPW/FPS/FPM as possible operational models of phenomenized differentiation rather than as substitutes for the modal-cosmogonic foundation of the Theory of Objectivity.
The study also articulates the neutrosophic T-I-F decomposition with the Expansive and Reductive Inducer Effects of TO, proposes a reading of δ as an operational boundary, and examines the informational dimension of FPW in relation to the TO interpretation of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. The analysis concludes that Smarandache’s article has a high degree of dialogue with TO, especially regarding boundary, discretization, triadicity, information, and the transition between continuous and discrete regimes.
This analytical study received analytical support from ChatGPT.
Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Florentin Smarandache; Finitesimally Punctured Waves; FPW; Finitesimally Punctured Surfaces; FPS; Finitesimally Punctured Manifolds; FPM; neutrosophy; modal axioms; phenomenic elements; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; Cosmological Eras; boundary; discretization; information; atomic radiation; quantum foundations; cosmology.
The analysis argues that Rayudu’s article offers a relevant mathematical-philosophical vocabulary for the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding the emergence of space not as an absolute pre-given stage, but as a consequence of relations, boundaries, forms, and logical conditions of objectivation. The article articulates this dialogue with the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, its phenomenic elements, its Inducer Effects, its cosmogonic theorem, and its cosmological Eras.
Special attention is given to the updated interpretation of the seventh absolute truth of the Theory of Objectivity, according to which the transcendent element corresponds to the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and is equivalent to atomic radiations. The study concludes that Rayudu’s article does not provide empirical confirmation of the Theory of Objectivity, but it offers a strong conceptual bridge for refining the TO’s treatment of space, cohesion, quality, objective logic, and informational transcendence.
This analytical text counted on the analytical support of ChatGPT.
Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; P. Venkata Rayudu; space; container; cohesion; quality; category theory; objective logic; boundary; incidence; figure; phenomenic elements; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; transcendent information; atomic radiation; consciousness studies; mathematical ontology; philosophy of physics.
The study examines Wong’s discussion of light sterile neutrino thermalisation, cosmological constraints from CMB, BAO, primordial nucleosynthesis and large-scale structure, neutrino self-interactions, and their possible relation to the Hubble tension. These themes are analysed in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), especially its modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras.
The article argues that Wong’s work does not directly confirm the Theory of Objectivity, since it remains within the framework of contemporary empirical cosmology and the parametrised language of the ΛCDM model and its extensions. Nevertheless, it offers a highly relevant field of dialogue with the TO, particularly because it shows that nearly invisible entities, such as sterile neutrinos, acquire robust cosmological status only when they leave observable relational marks across multiple empirical records.
From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, non-standard neutrinos may be interpreted as phenomenic elements whose objectivity depends on boundary, relation, recursive composition, multiple observation, and informational transcendence. The analysis also proposes that cosmological radiation, especially the CMB, may be read as a form of information produced by primordial physical relations, in accordance with the TO interpretation that the transcendent element corresponds to knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations.
This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT.
Keywords
Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Yvonne Y. Y. Wong; Cosmological Constraints on Non-Standard Neutrino Scenarios; sterile neutrinos; non-standard neutrino scenarios; neutrino self-interaction; Hubble tension; CMB; BAO; cosmological information; informational transcendence; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; modal ontology; cosmology; ΛCDM; Neutrino 2020; ChatGPT-assisted analysis.
The analysis examines the possible compatibilities and tensions between Rao’s speculative cosmological proposal and the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially the axioms concerning the logical Nothing, uniqueness, infinity as non-element, boundary, relational observation, recursive composition, and transcendent substance. It also articulates the discussion with TO’s phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogenic theorem, and cosmological Eras.
Special attention is given to the concepts of cosmic boundary, event horizon, exteriority, dark energy, unseen matter, and informational transcendence. From the perspective of TO, Rao’s hypothesis is recognized as highly dialogical because it challenges the self-sufficiency of the observable universe and emphasizes the role of externality in cosmic expansion. However, the article also argues that Rao’s model remains in tension with TO because it begins from a physically constituted primordial black hole, whereas TO seeks to derive cosmic origin from necessary logical-ontological conditions.
The study concludes that Rao’s article offers a fertile field for dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity, particularly regarding boundary, exteriority, expansion, and the insufficiency of the observable universe as an absolute totality. Nevertheless, TO reformulates the idea of transcendence not merely as external matter, but as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations.
This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT.
Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Lawrence Rao; Universal Eruptions; black holes; primordial black hole; event horizon; dark energy; dark energy;; cosmic acceleration; cosmogenesis; modal ontology; Inducer Effects; cosmological Eras; transcendent substance; informational transcendence; atomic radiation; cosmic boundary; philosophy of cosmology.
The article argues that Martins’s critique of the “black box” view of measuring instruments offers a relevant methodological bridge for the Theory of Objectivity. By showing that physical measurement presupposes prior conditions of comparison, equality, addition, calibration, and mathematical coherence, Martins reinforces the thesis that empirical objectivity cannot be reduced to raw instrumental data. In this respect, his work is analyzed in confrontation with the seven modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, its phenomenic elements, its Inducer Effects, its cosmogonic theorem, and its cosmological Eras.
Although Martins’s article does not directly address cosmology or the origin of the universe, it contributes significantly to the epistemological and methodological development of the Theory of Objectivity by supporting the need for rigorous operational bridges between modal axioms and empirical contact. The analysis also considers the current interpretation of the transcendent element in the Theory of Objectivity as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations.
This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT.
Keywords: TheoryofObjectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Roberto de Andrade Martins; measurement theory; operationalism; Helmholtz; Campbell; philosophy of physics; scientific objectivity; modal ontology; phenomenic elements; Inducer Effects; empirical testability; theory of measurement; atomic information; atomic radiation.
The present study examines this hypothesis in confrontation with the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially the axioms of boundary, infinity, recursive composition, observation, and transcendent informational substance. It also articulates Macdonald’s model with the phenomenic elements of TO, the Expansive and Reductive Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. Particular attention is given to the possibility of reading fractal geometry as a later geometric-operational manifestation of recursive composition and boundary multiplication, rather than as an ultimate ontological foundation of the universe.