Picasso once said at an exhibition of children's drawings that; "When I was the age of these children I could draw like Raphael; it took me many years to draw like these children". McMahon; 2002; This comment captured changing views in...
morePicasso once said at an exhibition of children's drawings that; "When I was the age of these children I could draw like Raphael; it took me many years to draw like these children". McMahon; 2002; This comment captured changing views in Europe during the early 20th century when the usefulness of drawing as a method of accurately rendering the world on a flat surface gave way to an emerging modernist perspective. During this change, drawing as a useful arts based activity, familiar to the 'plastic arts,' the academy style, publicly and academically become less clear and increasingly misunderstood by recent generations concerned with abstract and symbolic meaning. (Hyman, H. 2015) The later emergence of postmodernism and digital has rendered the activity less useful again, particularly in the graphic arts due to the rapid adoption of CAD and the computer mouse. (Zaher, M. 2018) Increasingly we see designers occupying their attention less and less with paper, pencil and pen, potentially rendering the act of drawing as a solitary, niche, pastoral activity that 'only some people can do", or less useful nor necessary for achieving acclaim within changing modernist academic, educational and social trends. Throughout history we have found ways of communicating, thoughts, beliefs, ideas, values using the common materials of the earth. Why we might ask, should our time be wasted drawing, or copying nature, when this has already been accomplished many thousands of times before? What can drawing hope to achieve between the generations outside of stylistic trends in regard to representation vs realism? Does appropriating such techniques mean we have nothing to say by doing so, that illustration is no more than storytelling or more aligned to the commercial arts? (Ross, F, 2014) Is there something significant, missing from the modernist approach? Are we at risk of teaching a confused abstract language which skimps too readily something very useful due to a persistent misunderstanding of drawings potential within the academic arts? Or should we try to reconsider drawing as a form of intellectual play, a method of gathering data or a mode for expressing new ideas that might help children create and understand complex narratives/concepts, particularly within an educational context, a tool for learning across the curriculum; or a new wave of practical and theoretical modal thinking outside of contemporary arts training? New online communities and virtual learning spaces seem to indicate this is happening, challenging concerns of educational and cultural silos, automation and a knowledge economy. While numeracy and literacy are key toward developing our capacity to understand, communicate and participate in the world, policy making continues to frustrate much of the academic discourse as to the usefulness of drawing especially, as an appropriate method for transmitting knowledge, interpreting and seeing the world accurately and the resulting academic confidence and improvement that might occur of such a meaningful 'sense making' activity. Some students, despite being at art school, cannot draw very well and would like to be able to draw well and that in particular, practical problems arose for students who practiced very competently in their particular medium, but could not draw. Simultaneously an emergence of digital art made possible by the ubiquitous advancement of powerful computing and screen based drawing technology has greatly accelerated a shared view within the commercial creative industries as to the usefulness of formal line drawing (disegno) technique and a new creative wave of which the author has become drawn toward and what has become an brought to you by CORE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk