Remote Work Productivity

All is not well in fully-remote OR fully in-office work. While new Gallup research reveals that fully remote workers are more engaged than even hybrid workers (and fully on-site workers are the least engaged - a slap in the face of RTO), they aren't thriving the most - hybrid workers are. It's perhaps no surprise (to all but some CEO's and managers) that fully on-site workers are thriving the least. Interestingly, hybrid workers experience the most stress (just a hair more than fully remote), and disturbingly, fully remote workers are more likely to experience anger, sadness, and loneliness - by a decent margin. Gallup believes that physical distance can create mental distance and that work becomes "just work" without deeper connections with coworkers that can be more easily formed from spending time together in person. They also think that it's the autonomy that comes with remote work which can create stress and lead to the negative emotions mentioned above. I think these are very interesting findings, and I would like to believe that most companies would take the time to reflect on them and take appropriate action. Here's what I think companies can do: 1. Address the emotional well-being of remote workers with regular check-ins, mental health resources, and virtual social activities to combat isolation. 2. Optimize hybrid work environments by creating create clear boundaries between work and home life, help their workers manage workloads effectively, and ensure hybrid workers aren't overcompensating with longer hours. 3. Explore the advantages of remote work, seek to understand what drives the higher engagement and apply these lessons across all work arrangements. 4. Given that each work arrangement faces different challenges, develop tailored well-being strategies for each work type. A one-size-fits-all approach isn't the way to go. 5. Ensure that remote workers have career development opportunities, opportunities to develop meaningful social connections, and achieve work-life balance to close the thriving gap. 6. For companies that are (or are considering moving to) fully in-office work, reconsider hybrid and/or remote work for the clear benefits. I know - wishful thinking, especially for #6. Here's the full Gallup report: https://lnkd.in/ezQB4K5q #WellBeing #EmployeeEngagement #WorkLifeBalance #FutureOfWork #RTO

I've spoken to 4,000+ companies about remote work since March 2020 Here are the most common things I've heard 👇 1. 🏢 HQ Obliteration: Return to office has stopped, companies have cut back the real estate they could, and will cut a lot more as leases expire. The majority of workers will work remotely at least part-time and the amount will grow 2. ⭐️ Access talent: The first reason they are going remote-first is simple – it lets them hire more talented people. Rather than hiring the best person in a 30-mile radius of the office, they can hire the best person in the world for every role 3. 💰 Cut costs: The second reason is because it makes them more cost-efficient. Rather than spending $10K-$20K per worker a year on office space they can provide a worldclass remote setup for less than $1,000 a year 4. 🌐 Universal problems: doesn’t matter the size of the organization, every company is dealing with the same thing. How do we operate as a global business? Equipping teams and managing assets is a huge pain point 5. 🏭 ESG Considerations: many companies care massively about the environmental impact eradicating the office – and the commute – has. 108 million tons of Co2 less every year. Boards are looking here as well 6. ❤️ Quality of life: companies also know they don’t need workers to waste 2 hours a day commuting to sit in an office chair for 8 hour. Companies have seen reducing commute frequency leads to happier more productive workers 7. 🚀 Outcomes vs. Time: the measure of performance in the office is how much time you spend sat in your seat. The measure of performance while working remotely has to be output. Companies are moving slowly here 8. 🎡 Hybrid Conflict: what companies and workers think hybrid means are two different things. Workers think it is being able to work remotely whenever they want. Companies think it is telling workers when they must attend. Big problem 9. 🛑 Bad Software: companies continue to use software and tooling designed for in-office teams causing issues for distributed workers. New tools developed by remote-native startups are emerging but not being adopted fast enough 10. 🔐 Tech & Security: in the old world the edge from a security perspective was the office, now it's every device. This creates big security risk and vulnerabilities as devices are lost. Companies lack good solutions

Remote teams don’t work? Here’s the truth: If your team needs constant watching... You’ve hired the wrong people. I've managed a remote team for 3+ years. Here’s what I’ve learned: 1/ The best people don’t need babysitting → They deliver results, not excuses. → Micromanagement kills trust. → Ownership drives real performance. → Accountability beats oversight. 2/ No commute means more growth → Extra hours for learning, not traffic. → Time spent on skills, not sitting still. → Work-life balance fuels productivity. → Efficiency replaces exhaustion. 3/ No office means no politics → Results matter more than appearances. → Ideas win, not egos. → Collaboration over competition. → Culture thrives without drama. Here’s how you can make it work: → Set clear KPIs that actually matter. → Monitor outcomes, not hours. → Document your process with Tango. → Give freedom to work where, when, and how. → Focus on impact—not desk time. Remote success isn’t about location—it’s about results. I started using Tango myself to streamline our workflows, keeping everyone aligned. For our remote team, it’s a game-changer. Why? Less explaining, more doing. ♻️ Repost and follow Justin Bateh, PhD for more.

4 ways in which we were thinking about remote work all wrong – insights from Running Remote 2024: Once a year, top thinkers on remote work come together for the Running Remote conference founded by Liam Martin (who I interviewed here.) But while the conference moniker may point to a remote-only world, the insights from this year's sessions were quite the opposite. As I couldn't attend, I asked some of the presenters and attendees, and this is how I found out that we're thinking about remote work all wrong: 1. It’s Not About Remote – It’s About Flexibility: The emphasis shifts from remote work being the primary goal to the need for flexibility in how work is done. The concept of being "distributed" rather than just "remote" is highlighted as critical, particularly for companies that operate at any significant scale. Flexibility in work arrangements is portrayed as essential for aligning, collaborating, and driving performance across diverse geographical and temporal boundaries. 2. Flexible Models Aren’t an Option – They Are a Necessity: The narrative around work models has evolved from viewing remote or hybrid models as optional to seeing them as essential. Hybrid models are particularly emphasized as a strategic necessity rather than a choice, underscoring the need for organizations to adapt to this model to retain talent and remain competitive. 3. We Can’t Forget to Solve the When and How: Beyond where people work, the discussion points to when and how they work as equally important. This includes considerations like the structuring of work hours and the design of work processes to optimize productivity and accommodate employees' personal needs, thus enhancing overall job satisfaction and output. 4. The Struggle is Real: Despite advancements in remote work strategies, the article acknowledges organizations' ongoing challenges in managing remote teams. These challenges are universal and not confined to any specific type of business or sector, indicating a need for ongoing adaptation and learning in remote work practices. For this and more, dive into edition 82 of Future Work below:

 Is there a trend the number of open jobs in the market indicate about WFH? Could we say that enterprises have had 5 significant shifts in thinking and approach towards flexibility and the need for it since 2020? 1)REMOTE IS POSSIBLE: The first shift in thinking was triggered by the novelty of large-scale remote working and the early-stage gains in efficiency and productivity. The profitability boost from lowered operating expenses saw enterprises giving up office real estate and declaring remote working as the future of the workplace. 2)FLEXIBLE BY FORCE: The second shift in thinking occurred when the hyper-hiring in 2021 triggered an unprecedented war for talent. While remote-working efficiencies and productivity had already normalized, enterprises kept remote working as a necessity to access talent for hiring. 3)BIRTH OF HYBRID: The third shift occurred when productivity & profitability dropped, high attrition rates and depleted employee engagement challenged full-time remote working. However, back-to-office mandates saw resistance from the workforce. Full-time hybrid roles gained popularity as a midway point between WFH and WFO and as a way to retain employees while they transition back to cubicles. 4)BACK TO OFFICE: The sustained headwinds in 2022 and 2023 forced enterprises to shed load through layoffs and correct the expensive talent buying done during the buoyancy. Full-time remote working options were dropped as an inefficient model, while hybrid stayed in play through 2023 and early 2024. 5)HYBRID OF REMOTE & WFO?: The period since the 2nd half of 2024 has been an inconsistent mix of responses to the flexible working formats. Enterprises and industries are altering their mix of full-time remote, hybrid and work-from-office openings. Continuing revenue and margin pressures in specific cohorts like IT products and IT services are driving thinking towards bringing back a more prominent presence of flexible working models. Meanwhile, other cohorts like startups, consulting services and traditional sectors continue their preference for WFO. Early indicators point towards the WFO and Flexible working openings to settle at an overall 80:20 mix for 2025, with a combination of sectors favouring flexible engagements and those who swear by WFO. A topic that refuses to bow down, and we haven't heard the last of it yet!

The classic office use case is slowly dying. The traditional notion of the office as merely a place for routine tasks and clocking in hours is even 'deader'. In its place, a new role is emerging—an experience that redefines the workplace as a dynamic, engaging environment where every visit is purposeful and enriching. Hybrid work models are becoming the norm, blending remote and in-person collaboration. This shift demands a reimagining of workplace experiences to make every office visit meaningful and worth the commute. Employees now seek more than just a desk; they desire spaces that inspire, engage, and foster a sense of community. In response, many companies are attempting to right-size their offices—optimizing space to reflect new work patterns and reducing underutilized areas. This strategic downsizing allows organizations to reinvest in better workplace experiences, creating environments that attract employees back to the office by offering unique benefits not found at home. Corporate real estate is being disrupted by this evolution, moving beyond simply providing physical spaces to crafting vibrant, people-focused environments. The office is transforming into a hub of collaboration, innovation, and culture-building—offering experiences that fully remote work cannot replicate. This flight to experience is about creating workplaces that employees are excited to be a part of...sometimes. To make hybrid work truly work, companies must integrate flexible spaces, unparalleled services, and sustainable practices. Hospitality-led solutions—such as gourmet food options featuring locally sourced ingredients, artisanal coffee experiences, and orgnizational/community engagement events — elevate the workplace. Seamless meeting management ensures that every gathering is impactful, with state-of-the-art audio-visual support, tailored catering, and efficient logistics. By recognizing that the traditional office model is fading and embracing the flight to experience, organizations can enhance employee satisfaction, attract top talent, and drive success in an ever-evolving work landscape. Right-sizing offices and reinvesting in superior workplace experiences are key strategies in this transformation. The future office is not just a place to work; it's a place to connect, collaborate, and create—making hybrid work truly effective and every office visit valuable. #FutureOfWork

I have made and saved a lot of money using remote teams across all of my companies.  Here’s how you do it: Almost every business could use at least some remote talent. It’s a great way to access a broader talent pool than your local area. You can also lower overhead costs — less office space, lower bills, and even hire talent from other countries. So how do you get the most out of a team that you don’t see face to face? Step 1: Define your objectives and needs Nail down your biggest reason for building a remote team. Broaden your hiring pool? More flexibility? Lower costs? Your main goal guides your future decisions. Then, assess which of your positions are suitable for remote or hybrid work. — Step 2: Develop a remote work policy A solid policy sets the tone and expectations for your team. Try to answer all questions ahead of time. Clarify Scope and Purpose: •  Who is eligible to work remotely? • For hybrid, how many days? • Is there a distance requirement? Set Communication Standards: • When should people be online and available? • What communication tools should they use? Security Protocols: Password manager?  VPN? Are you providing work equipment or expecting BYOD? — Step 3: Update your hiring process Build remote-specific job descriptions: Highlight skills like self-discipline and communication. Use diverse recruitment channels: Remote-specific job boards and communities. Tailor interviews for remote readiness: Include video calls and assess their home office setup. — Step 4: Find the right tools & technology Equip your team with tools that support collaboration and productivity. You’ll probably need: • An async communication hub (like Slack) • A video call platform (Google Meet) • A project management tool (Asana or Trello) • Hardware/software support Provide equipment or offer a stipend. — Step 5: Establish clear communication guidelines Effective communication is the backbone of remote work. Do you need people to: • Set online statuses? • Post daily updates? • Follow a response time rule? • When do you need people available for video calls? Make sure to set regular meetings and check-ins. Weekly stand-ups and monthly all-hands help keep everyone aligned. — Step 6: Build a strong team culture Strong remote teams thrive on culture and connection. Start with thorough virtual onboarding. Set up meet and greets and mentoring sessions. Add regular team activities: • Virtual coffee breaks • Game time • Casual Slack channels Celebrate everything: • Individual and team wins • Holidays • Company milestones — Step 7: Keep tabs on performance Address concerns head-on with clear goals and regular feedback. Set SMART goals: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Schedule quarterly reviews. Focus on outcomes — not hours worked. — If you’re interested in remote staff for your teams. Comment below or message me and I’ll get you connected.

Remote work is amazing. Until your living room starts feeling like a boardroom and your workday never really ends. Sound familiar? While remote work offers flexibility, it also comes with unique challenges like blurred boundaries, screen fatigue, and the struggle to truly disconnect. The key? Intentionality. I dive into the 7 biggest challenges of remote work and share strategies to overcome them: 1️⃣ Blurred Boundaries 👉 Challenge: When your home becomes your office, the lines between work and personal life often vanish. 💡 Solution: Set clear working hours and communicate them to your team. Create a dedicated workspace to mentally “leave work” at the end of the day. 2️⃣ Feeling Always ‘On’ 👉 Challenge: The convenience of technology means work can follow you everywhere—into meals, weekends, and even vacations. 💡 Solution: Use “Do Not Disturb” settings on your devices and schedule intentional breaks. Protect evenings and weekends by turning off work notifications outside your set hours. 3️⃣ Isolation 👉 Challenge: Without the energy of a shared office space, many remote workers experience loneliness or disconnection from their teams, affecting morale and mental health. 💡 Solution: Schedule regular virtual coffee chats with colleagues to nurture relationships. Consider joining local co-working spaces or community groups for social interaction. 4️⃣ Overlapping Roles 👉 Challenge: Balancing work responsibilities with household duties—like childcare, cooking, or chores—can create stress and distract from focused work. 💡 Solution: Communicate with family or roommates about your work schedule and boundaries. Use tools like time-blocking to separate work and home duties effectively. 5️⃣ Technology Overload 👉 Challenge: Spending hours on video calls, emails, and digital tools can lead to screen fatigue and overwhelm. 💡 Solution: Build screen-free breaks into your schedule and evaluate which meetings can be replaced with emails or asynchronous updates. 6️⃣ Lack of Routine 👉 Challenge: Without the structure of a commute or office rituals, days can feel unanchored. 💡 Solution: Establish a consistent morning routine that signals the start of the workday. Incorporate rituals like exercise, journaling, or a designated start time to set the tone. 7️⃣ Difficulty Unwinding 👉 Challenge: When your workspace is just a few steps away, it can be tempting to keep working—or hard to stop thinking about unfinished tasks. 💡 Solution: Create an end-of-day ritual to signal the workday is over. This could be going for a walk, tidying your workspace, or planning the next day’s tasks. Balance isn’t about perfection. It’s about making space for what truly matters. How have you tackled these challenges in your remote work journey? Share your thoughts or tips below! 👇

Remote Work Didn’t Fix Work. It Just Revealed What Was Already Broken. Post pandemic, remote work has been treated as a retention strategy. Offer flexibility, keep talent. The logic seemed airtight — until the data arrived to complicate it. A new study in Management Science, drawing on nearly 165,000 employees across 73,000 U.S. firms between 2020 and 2023, asks a question most organizations have avoided: Is remote work actually driving satisfaction, or are we confusing the signal for the source? The answer is uncomfortable for flexibility advocates. The “Remote Premium” Is Largely an Illusion. Yes, remote employees report higher job satisfaction and lower intent to leave — on the surface. But once researchers controlled for compensation, role type, demographics, and workplace culture factors like pay transparency, development opportunities, and feeling genuinely valued, the remote premium nearly vanished. What remained was a more fundamental truth: how people experience work matters far more than where they do it. What Actually Moves the Needle? — Two findings deserve boardroom attention. First, workplace fundamentals dominate. Feeling appreciated, having growth opportunities, and trusting leadership predict satisfaction at a magnitude remote work simply cannot match. Location is a perk. Culture is the foundation. Second — and more counterintuitively — remote work doesn’t automatically improve retention. When culture is held constant, fully remote employees actually show a higher intention to leave within six months. Flexibility without belonging accelerates exits, not prevent them. When Remote Work Does Help? The effects aren’t uniform. Flexibility delivers the clearest benefit in two specific scenarios: low-coordination roles where autonomy is genuinely productive, and teams with poor managers — where distance reduces friction rather than connection. That last point is worth sitting with. Remote work is most valuable as an escape from bad management. That’s not a ringing endorsement of the model — it’s a diagnostic of where organizations are failing. The Real Lesson Longitudinal data from the Gallup Workforce Panel reinforces the conclusion: strong managers moderate and enhance the value of remote work, while weak management makes flexibility backfire. Remote work is an amplifier, not a foundation. It makes strong cultures stronger and exposes weak ones faster. Organizations chasing hybrid policies while neglecting managerial quality, psychological safety, and genuine recognition are solving the wrong problem — with the wrong lever. The future of work isn’t about location. It’s about whether people feel trusted, developed, and led well enough to stay — regardless of where they’re sitting.

Stanford University says remote work kills productivity. The Bureau of Labor says it boosts productivity. Both are right and here’s why. Between 2019 and 2023, working from home in the US rose five-fold. Today, nearly 40% of employees work remotely at least one day a week (Stanford WFH Research Project). But the real story is not just about how many people work from home. It’s about how productivity changes depending on the model. 📌Fully remote: Research finds a 10% dip in productivity compared to fully in-office. Why? Barriers to mentoring, weaker collaboration, and the challenge of self-motivation all play a role. 📌Hybrid: Surprisingly, hybrid setups show no measurable loss in productivity. At the same time, they help companies attract and retain talent by offering flexibility without the downsides of full isolation. 📌Fully remote upside: Despite the productivity gap, firms embrace this model because of cost savings from reduced office space and the ability to tap into global talent. For some businesses, these advantages outweigh the challenges. Looking ahead, remote work will likely keep expanding since studies indicate that remote workers report a 35–40% increase in productivity, attributed to fewer distractions, more flexible work hours, and better focus. The lesson for leaders is clear: remote work is not simply about flexibility. It is about making intentional choices in how teams are structured, managed, and measured. Do you think hybrid is the long-term answer, or will fully remote eventually prove more valuable?