Groote Eylandt Mining Company (GEMCO) operates a manganese mine on Groote Eylandt in the Gulf of Carpentaria in northern Australia. The land is rehabilitated after mining, the pre-existing eucalypt-dominated woodland being the target...
moreGroote Eylandt Mining Company (GEMCO) operates a manganese mine on Groote Eylandt in the Gulf of Carpentaria in northern Australia. The land is rehabilitated after mining, the pre-existing eucalypt-dominated woodland being the target ecosystem and land use. The success of the rehabilitation has been variable, with many areas failing to develop toward a mature natural woodland ecosystem due to a number of factors. Issues have included varying rehabilitation goals over time; acacias, grasses and weeds out-competing the target eucalypt keystone species, and high grass biomass resulting in frequent intense fire, so that keystone juvenile, fire-susceptible plants are killed or suppressed. Vegetation monitoring was conducted over 2.5 years at 42 sites, including reference sites in natural woodland and rehabilitation ranging from 0.5 to 19 years of age. Univariate analysis of the vegetation data found that rehabilitation was somewhat similar to natural woodland in terms of species composition, but differed markedly in structure and the relative dominance of species. Multivariate classification and ordination analyses, based on a matrix of species composition and structural data, revealed that the 33 rehabilitated sites formed six distinct groups. These groups were ranked in decreasing similarity to woodland sites, based on location in the classification dendrogram as well as distance in ordination space. Three groups of rehabilitation sites were considered appropriate, transient states along the desired vegetation development or successional trajectory. The remaining groups were deemed 'undesirable' and unlikely to develop into the target eucalypt woodland, given the disturbance regime dominated by fire, without management intervention. Ordination revealed the relationships between the vegetation composition and structure of the rehabilitation and natural woodland, on the one hand, and a range of environment and management variables. Six potential environmental or management determinants were significantly related to the variation in vegetation, including site age, litter depth, topsoil utilisation, seed mix, litter cover and fertiliser use. A field trial compared four substrates to achieve best early-rehabilitation germination and establishment. The substrates were fresh topsoil, subsoil, a topsoil-subsoil mix and a 'sandtails' waste product from mining. Subsoil achieved best germination and establishment percentages. Treatments containing topsoil showed less early establishment of keystone eucalypts and higher levels of grass cover compared to other treatments. iv A combination of a vital-attributes approach to the response of key species to time and disturbance by fire, with a state-and-transition (S&T) model of the identified rehabilitation groups, was used to develop a comprehensive S&T model of the observed and predicted rehabilitation at Groote Eylandt. The model included catalogues and diagrams of the observed and hypothetical states and transitions between states, from which a set of interventions was developed for potential application by managers to redirect deviant states. A simplified version of the model was also developed, with quantitative assessment criteria, for immediate field trialling and application. GEMCO can use the assessment criteria in their monitoring program to identify early in the rehabilitation process whether sites are on a desirable or undesirable successional pathway. Sites on undesirable pathways will require appropriate management interventions to return them to the desired successional trajectory. Potential management interventions suggested as a result of this research include enrichment planting, weed management, fire, application of mulch, fresh topsoil islands and thinning of Acacia shrubs. As further monitoring and research is conducted, the model can be refined and updated to improve GEMCO's rehabilitation management. The combination of vital attributes (VA) and state-and-transition (S&T) models in a VAST approach to defining successional development and assessment criteria in the rehabilitation of a natural ecosystem has considerable potential in ecological restoration elsewhere. It is applicable to a wide variety of ecosystems and land uses (e.g. mining, forestry and agriculture); it is practical, and valuable even in relatively simple, naïve form. It also has the virtue of being able to be refined and updated through repeated use and testing. v Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Australian Research Council (SPIRT Program C00002376), GEMCO and the University of New England for providing financial and logistical support for this project. A number of previous and current GEMCO employees have made substantial contributions to this work. Ross Browning, Maged Said, Cameron Chaffey and Leon Staude are acknowledged for their support early in the establishment of the project, and Matt Lord, Rick Peters and Ross MacDonald are thanked for their support throughout the work. I must thank my supervisors, including Nick Reid, John Duggin and Carl Grant, for their encouragement, patience, and scholarly direction. John and Carl initiated the project, along with Ross Browning (then of GEMCO), and provided early direction and support with the work and analysis. Nick provided advice and encouragement, helped with pulling the thesis together, and read each draft chapter painstakingly, for which I am thoroughly indebted. I am also very grateful to Di Davies (mum) and Rowena Smith who assisted with proofreading various parts of the final thesis. Assistance with identification of more than 250 tropical plant species was gratefully received from John Hunter (UNE), Rob Orkney, and Ian Cowie and Bob Harwood from the Darwin Herbarium. Many hours were spent in the UNE laboratory with kind assistance from Marion Costigan and fellow postgraduates. Work in the field was possible only with the support received from GEMCO staff including, Brian Todd, Matt Lord, Cindy Busbridge and the rest of the GEMCO rehabilitation crew. Ngeniyerriya!! Various employers have been generous in their support of my completing this work, in particular Haakon Nielssen and Sinead Kaufman of Rio Tinto Alcan Weipa. But no doubt the most patience and emotional support has come from my family in Armidale and partner, Michael Phillips. I could not have done it without them. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW .